Auditor Competencies in their Sciences and/or Disciplines

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Trusted Information Resource
#1
There is a question for discussion, down a bit.

Under ISO/IEC 17011, which all Accrediting Bodies (ABs) must comply with, they must send competent assessors to customers.

If the customer organization provides ISO9001/ISO 14001, etc. then the assessors must be competent in those sciences and/or disciplines. Typically the assessments are then under ISO/IEC 17021, but IAF also oversees ISO/IEC 17024.

If it is a laboratory or inspection body, then the standards are ISO/IEC 17025/17020, again, the assessors must be competent in those sciences and/or disciplines.

However, if the customer of the AB, such as a Registrar, is providing ISO9001, ISO 14001, ISO 18001, etc., then the organization such as a manufacturer undergoes audits.

How often do such organizations, whether manufacturers, environmental, laboratories, or others, have confidence that the Auditor/Assessor actually has competency in their business areas?

How many would like to know what they can require if they do not have confidence?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Leader
Admin
#2
As per expectations of ANAB and 17011, before being allowed to audit critical functions under 9001, 14001, RC etc. I must have submitted a form that describes my experience in the SIC in sufficient terms to lend confidence that I would understand the ins-and-outs adequate to evaluate that client's system's effectiveness. The form is approved by management and the SIC gets added to a list under my name in the database.

While it's not required to qualify under one of these SICs, ideally the candidate does so and the qualifier can feel satisfied about competency via direct observation.
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Trusted Information Resource
#3
Jennifer, you are correct regarding requirements. Yet we see post after post where the obvious question is the independence and/or competency of the auditor.

To me that suggests that the requirements, or more precisely, the enforcement, may have gaps.

That is what this post is for, to at least allow some blowing off of steam.

Hope this helps.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#4
FDA recently has disclosed a five year plan to radically change their field inspection system. Certain inspectors will be assigned to medical devices only, all inspectors will be managed out of Maryland and the regional offices no longer will have anything to do with medical device inspections, and every inspector will be a specialist in a narrow range of device types and Product Codes. Thus if I make Left Handed Widgets in Boston and you make Left Handed Widgets in San Diego, and we're the only two makers of that specialized device type, we almost certainly will have the same inspector, who will know a lot about that device type in addition to having a general knowledge of the GMPs/QSR.

With this inspector-specialization system, inspectors also will be expected to be subject matter experts for 510(k) / PMA / IDE reviews and management of adverse event situations and public health problems.
 
P

pldey42

#5
Enforcement is undoubtedly weak, as these forums show.

If one is cynical - and of course nobody here is, being all of a constructive mindset :) - the reason, as has been said before, is that clients pay CBs, CBs pay ABs. It's not in the financial interests of any of these businesses to be too critical; if one is, one fears being in turn the victim of critical thinking. It's all in line with the public charters, articles of association and so forth - but not IMHO nearly effective enough. Worse, it's all shrouded in secrecy, hidden disingenuously behind client confidentiality, so there's no real, public accountability.

What to do? Well, if one has no respect for one's auditors, why employ them? Why get certified?

If the answer is, "We're bound by contract to get certified", then either one manages the CB assertively (with inherent risk. Complain about an incompetent auditor and they follow procedure and send another; better the devil you know, etc.); or one forges a constructive relationship of mutual respect (best strategy I think, can be done if CB has a decent pool of competency) ;or one manipulates the audit, e.g. by sending the honest loose cannons on vacation during audits (nobody does that, of course).

Of course, if it all worked, we'd barely need Elsmar Cove and then what would we do?

Pat
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#6
Hershal is on target, slightly off center as well, but that's OK. I still run into many auditors auditing that have nearly no hands on or real world personal experience in the subject matter of audits, especially in safety and environmental. By and large most environmental auditors have never had to manage an environmental program and all the fun things that go with it like Title V's (5's), multiple MACT's, SPCCP's, regulators in their face, NESHAP, SARA reporting, form R's and every other buzz word/phrase...The same holds true for health & safety auditors, they may be able to spell safety and they may have been on a plant safety committee, but they don't have the solid safety background that would allow them to differentiate whether something is an acute or chronic safety/health issue.

I'll go a step further with aerospace....I absolutely and seriously doubt that a majority of AS type auditors have background like someone like me in aviation. Oh sure, they may have been a QC or QA type, maybe worked in a manufacturing facility for whatever, but to have hands on experience from front to back, top to bottom, and in flight verification/validation, no way Jose.

However, what we've got, we've got...Take a fluff crash course, pass an exam and have someone sign you off and Wham-Bam you can audit.

What's the solution? It would be easier to predict earthquakes.
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
#7
In defense of many (definitely not all) auditors, I have encountered auditors from regulatory bodies, registrars and customers who were extremely well versed (book knowledge) and field experienced (practical hands-on knowledge) in the subject matter they were auditing.

Just as one example, my FAA inspector blew my socks off when he was able to converse knowledgeably about metallurgy one day, stress factors, force vectors, and emf interference the next visit and then fly a field test of a multi-engine jet transport the following week. His major problem was having to suck up to less knowledgeable, but more politically savvy superiors in the FAA.

I found that some of these folks were able to "educate" their auditees without crossing the line into consulting, advocating, or dictating. I wish more auditors could fit that pattern.
 
P

pldey42

#8
Thanks for the reminder on balance, Wes.

You remind me that many good auditors rely, not upon their own technical experience, but that of the client's staff - who, after all, know what's really going on. A good auditor can encourage people to identify NCs and evidence, provided the management hasn't driven fear into the organization - and sometimes, even when they have.

With that in mind, I think the most valuable audit competencies are the ability to listen, and an interview technique that's non-threatening.

Pat
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
#9
Thanks for the reminder on balance, Wes.

You remind me that many good auditors rely, not upon their own technical experience, but that of the client's staff - who, after all, know what's really going on. A good auditor can encourage people to identify NCs and evidence, provided the management hasn't driven fear into the organization - and sometimes, even when they have.

With that in mind, I think the most valuable audit competencies are the ability to listen, and an interview technique that's non-threatening.

Pat
Sure, but as a professor of mine once noted over 50 years ago, a big part of assessing someone else's work is the ability to
"separate flyspecks from pepper before ingesting"

which was her "non-vulgar" description of "bulls**t detector." It implies you have to have some knowledge for the separation to be effective.

I, myself, have been guilty on more than one occasion of seasoning my offerings with flyspecks instead of pepper. I find that more flyspecks than pepper never helps anyone's digestion.
 

John Broomfield

Leader
Super Moderator
#10
People who are experts in the products and process of the system they are meant to be auditing may not have also had the time to become excellent management system auditors.

The lead auditor is meant to decide when additional technical expertise is needed to plan the audit or to conduct the audit investigation.

If such expertise is needed to fulfill the audit objective then the lead auditor is obliged to make recommendations to the audit client for the audit to be feasible.

If such expertise is not forthcoming then the lead auditor advises the audit client that the audit objective cannot be fulfilled.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Crusader ASQ AS9100 Lead Auditor Training Career and Occupation Discussions 27
J New QMS Auditor - seeking opportunities to gain audit experience Career and Occupation Discussions 3
A " I, as a 3rd party auditor, retain the obligation to determine whether or not the process is "effective"... Discuss. Registrars and Notified Bodies 5
X Looking for 17025 auditor to perform internal audit on IT software testing laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
B Internal Auditor Competence for Automotive CSR's IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Ed Panek Auditor Comment about MDR vs MDD EU Medical Device Regulations 10
K 3rd party auditor for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K AS9100 - Looking for advice on how to become a CB Auditor AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
Ed Panek Question from 13485 Auditor ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Rude Customer Auditor General Auditing Discussions 18
G Medical Device Auditor (CMDA) certification exam by ASQ - looking for input Career and Occupation Discussions 3
Sidney Vianna IAQG News New IAQG Resources - AS9104-3 Requirements for Aerospace Auditor Competency & Training Courses AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
D Internal auditor competence assessment Internal Auditing 13
Robert Stanley Can You Reject an Auditor? Registrars and Notified Bodies 38
Sidney Vianna Job Opening in the USA - IATF 16949 Lead Auditor Position Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
R Lead auditor scenario (Need help) is this non conforming to ISO13485 Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
P Does FDA require certification for quality system internal audit for auditor? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
P Looking to outsource Internal Audit - MDSAP competent auditor needed Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 9
S Transition training for Internal Auditor from ISO 9001: 2008 to the ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
J IATF CB Auditor questions Internal Auditor Competence IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 19
Sidney Vianna Food & Beverage Safety Lead Auditor Open Position - USA Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
M Best accreditation body for AS9100D Lead facility auditor? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
Ed Panek Auditor MDR (Presub audit) finding EU Medical Device Regulations 2
I Freelance VDA6.3 Auditor at TURKEY VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 1
M VDA 6.3 – Workshop for Certified Process Auditor VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 4
R CB/Auditor Requiring a change in scope ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
W Redacting Info Before Giving to Auditor ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
T Quality auditor legal right to see Board meeting minutes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
V Certified Auditor - Need of additional certification specific to industry ( GMPs) ASQ vs ECA vs others Professional Certifications and Degrees 1
V Internal Auditor Competency KPI IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
R American Petroleum Institute - Becoming an API Auditor Professional Certifications and Degrees 3
B Lowest cost way to pass Lead Auditor exam ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
B Internal Auditor Competency - Product Auditors Internal Auditing 9
U Internal Auditor not trained but done Audit for some process Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
Z Auditor Findings ISO 14001:2015 vs. 45001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
B IATF16949 audit requirement - Auditor request UCL and LCL must be show Xbar-R, IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
A Becoming an ISO27001 3rd Party Auditor Career and Occupation Discussions 4
L ASQ's Biomedical Auditor Course Test ASQ - American Society for Quality 1
M Tips on preparing for IATF 16949 Internal Lead Auditor exam Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
G Same parts but new customer - What will the auditor ask me? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Gun46 ISO 9001 : 2015 Lead Auditor Exam General Auditing Discussions 16
K %GRR was between 10-30% so we have to have a "backup plan" per auditor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
S ISO 13485 Lead Auditor - Debate between our Quality Team and Regulatory Auditor - Internal Auditor Training ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 42
R ISO 45001 Lead Auditor Exam paper Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
B Internal and external auditor competency to CSR's IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
A Our auditor told if we didn't have a patent we would have to do a validation or verification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
W Certification for IATF Lead Auditor will expire in 2020 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D Impartiality of Internal Auditor ISO 9001/13485 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
Ed Panek Auditor driving us nuts - ESD requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 23

Similar threads

Top Bottom