Auditor wants our Gage R&R Procedures to address Linearity, Accuracy and Stability

G

Greg Fote

#1
Linearity, accuracy and stability

We have our R & R procedures and work instructions operating smoothly. Can anyone offer any assistance on what they are currently doing with linearity, accuracy, and stability as defined in the MSA manual?

Are you using specifically-written procedures and/or work instructions for these activities?

Are the auditors looking at these items closely during audits?

Thanks in advance for any advice or assistance and/or samples you can offer.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#2
You might first want to read the following thread from the 'old' board:

Bias, Linearity and Such - from the old forums.

Mr. Adamek and I had a somewhat extended 'conversation' to which I admit I was pretty hard headed... I think he got mad at me...

In addition, you might want to check out:

Some Calibration - MSA related tidbits

The bottom line is auditors are beginning more and more to address MSA issues. They want to see evidence of understanding and utilization of MSA concepts. It would probably be wise about now to consider a procedure explaining how you address linearity and bias and such. It could be very simple and along the precepts of what is in the threads hot-linked in this message reply.

By the way - Did you know Gage R&Rs are not *mandatory*???

Hope this helps!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
B

Bill Smith

#3
The UL auditor that just left our facility looked very closley at MSA and wrote us up for not measuring and trending stability. What he wanted to see was the past calibration results plotted for each instrument. I havent fully checked this out but it seems excessive. We were going the obligatory GR&R studies so we are still looking into the validity of this Action request.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#4
Bill - My opinion is that is a crock of ----. Where does it say you have to trend on paper? If the calibration person has half a bean of intelligence s/he can easily look at the numbers and understand what is happening without putting together a graph. I just went thru this with LRQA in May. They didn't require a graph - but they did want the cal folks to prove that they considered this at each calibration and that the concept is understood.

UL is known to be asinine about MSA - But, other registrars are hitting it more now too. I will admit that many, many companies do not have people who really understand MSA, but the auditors are getting rediculous.
 
C

Christian Lupo

#5
Bias and Linearity should be known before you do a GRR study. My company has a procedure for MSA, that includes GRR. In fact, GRR is one of the last, if not the last step in an MSA study. As far as stability is concerned, the procedure gives the QA Manager the responsibility to decide if a stability study is necessary. The QA manager's job description requires him (her) to have MSA and SPC training. Stability studies may not be necessary for computer controlled equipment or if the cost of the project outweigh the benefit.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#6
I agree with you 100% Christian. You are looking at MSA as a high order system - which it is. R&R is done late in the game. It sounds like you have a well written procedure. I'd love to see it.
 
D

David McGan

#7
Christian, when you're e-mailing a copy of your procedure to Marc, copy me in also. Or just post it here for all of us to read.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#9
Comments, folks?

----snippo----------

Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 10:49:57 -0400
From: Bruno Brazauskas
To: Greg Gogates
Subject: Re: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY RE4

Per the previously recommended AIAG manual:

The data is the result of measurements taken with the gage being evaluated, utilizing the appropriate gaging instructions. The samples, which are measured, may be either production parts or masters. Collect the data in a manner which is similar to, but in terms of repetition not quite the same as a gage R&R study.

For Linearity, the samples should be taken from the expected operating range of the gage. The bias on each of these parts is determined to be the difference between the reference value and the observed average measurement. The reference value for each part is determined through a different means. These means may be plate or other inspection machine layout or through an independent or calibration lab.

For Stability, it is not necessary to have parts from the expected operating range of the gage but it is still a good idea. As the AIAG MSA states, sample size and the frequency of the measurements should be based on your knowledge of the measurement system. So you may use the same parts as you used for the Linearity Evaluation. For this study, the measurements are taken over time (i.e.. the same parts are measured again and again over a predetermined time).

Bruno Brazauskas
Inspection Technologies, Inc.

Greg Gogates wrote:

> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 09:05:37 -0400
> Subject: Re:GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY RE3
>
> Forgive me but I'm still confused on the data collection. Is this data from
> actual production part measurement, calibration data, Gage R&R data or how do I
> obtain the data? I guess I'm a little dumb but I'm not sure what data to use for
> these studies.
>
> ____________________Reply Separator____________________
> Subject: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY RE3
> Author: Greg Gogates
> Date: 6/5/00 11:38 AM
>
> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 08:44:18 -0400
> From: "Bruno J. Brazauskas"
> To: Greg Gogates
> Subject: Re: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY
>
> These types of studies may be simple or more involved. The simple
> versions are as follows and reference GM's Statistical Process Control
> Manual:
>
> Basically, "Gage Stability" is the difference (range) in the average of
> a minimum of two sets of measurements taken with the same gage on the
> same samples at different times. For example, using gage "A" and sample
> "1" take 10 readings today and average them. Repeat this test tomorrow
> under the same conditions. The difference between today's and tomorrow's
> averages is the stability of gage "A" over one day.
>
> "Gage Linearity" is the range of values derived from at least groups of
> data. It is a little more complicated and requires that the actual
> values of samples to be tested are known. A known sample at the low end
> of the specification is measured with the gage and the difference
> between actual and measured readings is recorded. This is repeated with
> a sample from the high end of the specification. The range obtained
> from these deviations is the gage linearity.
>
> A more involved approach may be found within the AIAG's "Measurement
> Systems Analysis (MSA)." It includes more information in the form of
> "Guidelines for Determining Linearity" and "Guidelines for Determining
> Stability."
>
> Bruno Brazauskas
> Inspection Technologies, Inc.
>
> Greg Gogates wrote:
> >
> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:34:59 -0400
> > Subject: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY
> >
> > I have been requested by our QS9000 registrar to begin performing Gage
> > Stablility and Linearity Studies. I have performed Gage R&R studies but never
> > linearity or stability studies. Can anyone give me some detailed information
> on
> > what type of data collection is needed to perform these studies and how to
> > perform these studies? I have software (Gagetrak 4.0) for analyzing the data
> but
> > it doesn't really specify exactly how and what type of data is needed.
> > Thank you.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#10
Evolution of MSA Requirements

Just as an 'Oh My' fact, this thread sorta dates when registrars in QS started looking at stability and linearity - when MSA started reguiring more 'details'. Any comments? :thedeal:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L Quality Manager wants Internal Auditor to softgrade the findings - What shall I do? Internal Auditing 23
E Auditor wants to review our OHSAS 18001 Implementation Programme Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 5
I Control of a Harness Board - Our auditor wants the engineer to Control Manufacturing and Related Processes 18
R Auditor wants me to get rid of 'Satisfaction' from QM - Can't get no... satisfaction ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 53
S New Auditor wants Mould tool repair bill included in Cost of Poor Quality! IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
J Internal Process Auditing - Auditor Unhappy - Wants Layered Process Audits Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 13
A How do you Measure Operator Motivation / Morale? Our Auditor wants Documentation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 39
H Document Revision Service? Auditor wants a service for document revision/renewal ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Auditor wants to know where our calibration procedure came from - TS16949 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14
L % Uncertainty Budgets - Auditor wants to see my uncertainty budget represented as a % Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 5
Jerry Eldred Calibration Methods - Auditor wants federal or international calibration procedures? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 33
B IATF16949 audit requirement - Auditor request UCL and LCL must be show Xbar-R, IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
A Becoming an ISO27001 3rd Party Auditor Career and Occupation Discussions 4
L ASQ's Biomedical Auditor Course Test ASQ - American Society for Quality 1
M Tips on preparing for IATF 16949 Internal Lead Auditor exam Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
G Same parts but new customer - What will the auditor ask me? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Gun46 ISO 9001 : 2015 Lead Auditor Exam General Auditing Discussions 5
K %GRR was between 10-30% so we have to have a "backup plan" per auditor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
S ISO 13485 Lead Auditor - Debate between our Quality Team and Regulatory Auditor - Internal Auditor Training ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
R ISO 45001 Lead Auditor Exam paper Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
B Internal and external auditor competency to CSR's IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
A Our auditor told if we didn't have a patent we would have to do a validation or verification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
W Certification for IATF Lead Auditor will expire in 2020 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D Impartiality of Internal Auditor ISO 9001/13485 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
Ed Panek Auditor driving us nuts - ESD requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 23
A OHSAS 18001 external auditor finding personal interpretation? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 5
S IRCA Lead Auditor training and Exam tips Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
L ASQ CBA biomedical auditor - CBA primer material is enough to study? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
B VDA 6.3 Qualification as Process Auditor training course and exam VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 0
F ISO 21001 Educational Organizations Management - How to become an auditor Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
J Getting training either from ASQ or from SAI Global - ISO 9001 Lead Auditor training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
P ASQ Certified Biomedical Auditor (CBA) Certification Preparation 2019 ASQ - American Society for Quality 3
M Medical Device Design Control Auditor Recommentations General Auditing Discussions 19
G Third party auditor mentions no grace period for calibration Calibration Frequency (Interval) 22
D Where (in US) can I get the VDA Auditor Edition book? VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 3
S AIAG CQI Auditor Qualification and 3rd Party Certification Requirements General Auditing Discussions 2
M IATF 16949 7.2.3 Internal Auditor Competency - Trainer's competency Internal Auditing 7
C Recommendations for UK-based ISO 13485 internal auditor training ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
Sidney Vianna AS9100 News July 2019 AAQG/RMC CB Auditor Workshop - Presentation Materials AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
D Scope of Facility - Our auditor asked us last week for our "Scope of the Facility" AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 12
A ISO 9001 lead auditor as Full time career India Career and Occupation Discussions 2
J Manufacturing Process Auditor Requirements - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
GreatNate ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Course? (who to take with) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
A External Auditor issue with Internal Audits Internal Auditing 7
QAQT Internal Auditor competence for ISO 14001 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 11
S IATF 16949: Is "Certified" Internal Auditor mandatory? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
S Internal Auditing for API Spec Q1 - auditor qualification requirements Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
J Your opinion on the better training org for IATF16949 Internal auditor and Lead Auditor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
K Turtle diagram or process interaction chart - Making it easier for an auditor Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 22
C TL-9000 Certifying Body Issue - Auditor failed to find an issue for 10 years TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 16

Similar threads

Top Bottom