Auditor wants our Gage R&R Procedures to address Linearity, Accuracy and Stability

G

Greg Fote

#1
Linearity, accuracy and stability

We have our R & R procedures and work instructions operating smoothly. Can anyone offer any assistance on what they are currently doing with linearity, accuracy, and stability as defined in the MSA manual?

Are you using specifically-written procedures and/or work instructions for these activities?

Are the auditors looking at these items closely during audits?

Thanks in advance for any advice or assistance and/or samples you can offer.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#2
You might first want to read the following thread from the 'old' board:

Bias, Linearity and Such - from the old forums.

Mr. Adamek and I had a somewhat extended 'conversation' to which I admit I was pretty hard headed... I think he got mad at me...

In addition, you might want to check out:

Some Calibration - MSA related tidbits

The bottom line is auditors are beginning more and more to address MSA issues. They want to see evidence of understanding and utilization of MSA concepts. It would probably be wise about now to consider a procedure explaining how you address linearity and bias and such. It could be very simple and along the precepts of what is in the threads hot-linked in this message reply.

By the way - Did you know Gage R&Rs are not *mandatory*???

Hope this helps!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
B

Bill Smith

#3
The UL auditor that just left our facility looked very closley at MSA and wrote us up for not measuring and trending stability. What he wanted to see was the past calibration results plotted for each instrument. I havent fully checked this out but it seems excessive. We were going the obligatory GR&R studies so we are still looking into the validity of this Action request.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#4
Bill - My opinion is that is a crock of ----. Where does it say you have to trend on paper? If the calibration person has half a bean of intelligence s/he can easily look at the numbers and understand what is happening without putting together a graph. I just went thru this with LRQA in May. They didn't require a graph - but they did want the cal folks to prove that they considered this at each calibration and that the concept is understood.

UL is known to be asinine about MSA - But, other registrars are hitting it more now too. I will admit that many, many companies do not have people who really understand MSA, but the auditors are getting rediculous.
 
C

Christian Lupo

#5
Bias and Linearity should be known before you do a GRR study. My company has a procedure for MSA, that includes GRR. In fact, GRR is one of the last, if not the last step in an MSA study. As far as stability is concerned, the procedure gives the QA Manager the responsibility to decide if a stability study is necessary. The QA manager's job description requires him (her) to have MSA and SPC training. Stability studies may not be necessary for computer controlled equipment or if the cost of the project outweigh the benefit.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#6
I agree with you 100% Christian. You are looking at MSA as a high order system - which it is. R&R is done late in the game. It sounds like you have a well written procedure. I'd love to see it.
 
D

David McGan

#7
Christian, when you're e-mailing a copy of your procedure to Marc, copy me in also. Or just post it here for all of us to read.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#9
Comments, folks?

----snippo----------

Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 10:49:57 -0400
From: Bruno Brazauskas
To: Greg Gogates
Subject: Re: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY RE4

Per the previously recommended AIAG manual:

The data is the result of measurements taken with the gage being evaluated, utilizing the appropriate gaging instructions. The samples, which are measured, may be either production parts or masters. Collect the data in a manner which is similar to, but in terms of repetition not quite the same as a gage R&R study.

For Linearity, the samples should be taken from the expected operating range of the gage. The bias on each of these parts is determined to be the difference between the reference value and the observed average measurement. The reference value for each part is determined through a different means. These means may be plate or other inspection machine layout or through an independent or calibration lab.

For Stability, it is not necessary to have parts from the expected operating range of the gage but it is still a good idea. As the AIAG MSA states, sample size and the frequency of the measurements should be based on your knowledge of the measurement system. So you may use the same parts as you used for the Linearity Evaluation. For this study, the measurements are taken over time (i.e.. the same parts are measured again and again over a predetermined time).

Bruno Brazauskas
Inspection Technologies, Inc.

Greg Gogates wrote:

> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 09:05:37 -0400
> Subject: Re:GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY RE3
>
> Forgive me but I'm still confused on the data collection. Is this data from
> actual production part measurement, calibration data, Gage R&R data or how do I
> obtain the data? I guess I'm a little dumb but I'm not sure what data to use for
> these studies.
>
> ____________________Reply Separator____________________
> Subject: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY RE3
> Author: Greg Gogates
> Date: 6/5/00 11:38 AM
>
> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 08:44:18 -0400
> From: "Bruno J. Brazauskas"
> To: Greg Gogates
> Subject: Re: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY
>
> These types of studies may be simple or more involved. The simple
> versions are as follows and reference GM's Statistical Process Control
> Manual:
>
> Basically, "Gage Stability" is the difference (range) in the average of
> a minimum of two sets of measurements taken with the same gage on the
> same samples at different times. For example, using gage "A" and sample
> "1" take 10 readings today and average them. Repeat this test tomorrow
> under the same conditions. The difference between today's and tomorrow's
> averages is the stability of gage "A" over one day.
>
> "Gage Linearity" is the range of values derived from at least groups of
> data. It is a little more complicated and requires that the actual
> values of samples to be tested are known. A known sample at the low end
> of the specification is measured with the gage and the difference
> between actual and measured readings is recorded. This is repeated with
> a sample from the high end of the specification. The range obtained
> from these deviations is the gage linearity.
>
> A more involved approach may be found within the AIAG's "Measurement
> Systems Analysis (MSA)." It includes more information in the form of
> "Guidelines for Determining Linearity" and "Guidelines for Determining
> Stability."
>
> Bruno Brazauskas
> Inspection Technologies, Inc.
>
> Greg Gogates wrote:
> >
> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:34:59 -0400
> > Subject: GAGE STABILITY AND LINEARITY
> >
> > I have been requested by our QS9000 registrar to begin performing Gage
> > Stablility and Linearity Studies. I have performed Gage R&R studies but never
> > linearity or stability studies. Can anyone give me some detailed information
> on
> > what type of data collection is needed to perform these studies and how to
> > perform these studies? I have software (Gagetrak 4.0) for analyzing the data
> but
> > it doesn't really specify exactly how and what type of data is needed.
> > Thank you.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#10
Evolution of MSA Requirements

Just as an 'Oh My' fact, this thread sorta dates when registrars in QS started looking at stability and linearity - when MSA started reguiring more 'details'. Any comments? :thedeal:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L Quality Manager wants Internal Auditor to softgrade the findings - What shall I do? Internal Auditing 23
E Auditor wants to review our OHSAS 18001 Implementation Programme Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 5
I Control of a Harness Board - Our auditor wants the engineer to Control Manufacturing and Related Processes 18
R Auditor wants me to get rid of 'Satisfaction' from QM - Can't get no... satisfaction ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 53
S New Auditor wants Mould tool repair bill included in Cost of Poor Quality! IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
J Internal Process Auditing - Auditor Unhappy - Wants Layered Process Audits Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 13
A How do you Measure Operator Motivation / Morale? Our Auditor wants Documentation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 39
H Document Revision Service? Auditor wants a service for document revision/renewal ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Auditor wants to know where our calibration procedure came from - TS16949 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14
L % Uncertainty Budgets - Auditor wants to see my uncertainty budget represented as a % Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 5
Jerry Eldred Calibration Methods - Auditor wants federal or international calibration procedures? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 33
C VDA 6.3 Auditor Expiration - Grace Period? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
B Auditor from other country ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5
Crusader ASQ AS9100 Lead Auditor Training Career and Occupation Discussions 27
J New QMS Auditor - seeking opportunities to gain audit experience Career and Occupation Discussions 3
A " I, as a 3rd party auditor, retain the obligation to determine whether or not the process is "effective"... Discuss. Registrars and Notified Bodies 5
X Looking for 17025 auditor to perform internal audit on IT software testing laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
B Internal Auditor Competence for Automotive CSR's IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Ed Panek Auditor Comment about MDR vs MDD EU Medical Device Regulations 10
K 3rd party auditor for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K AS9100 - Looking for advice on how to become a CB Auditor AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
Ed Panek Question from 13485 Auditor ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Rude Customer Auditor General Auditing Discussions 18
G Medical Device Auditor (CMDA) certification exam by ASQ - looking for input Career and Occupation Discussions 3
Sidney Vianna IAQG News New IAQG Resources - AS9104-3 Requirements for Aerospace Auditor Competency & Training Courses AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
D Internal auditor competence assessment Internal Auditing 13
Robert Stanley Can You Reject an Auditor? Registrars and Notified Bodies 48
Sidney Vianna Job Opening in the USA - IATF 16949 Lead Auditor Position Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
R Lead auditor scenario (Need help) is this non conforming to ISO13485 Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
P Does FDA require certification for quality system internal audit for auditor? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
P Looking to outsource Internal Audit - MDSAP competent auditor needed Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 9
S Transition training for Internal Auditor from ISO 9001: 2008 to the ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
J IATF CB Auditor questions Internal Auditor Competence IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 19
Sidney Vianna Food & Beverage Safety Lead Auditor Open Position - USA Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
M Best accreditation body for AS9100D Lead facility auditor? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
Ed Panek Auditor MDR (Presub audit) finding EU Medical Device Regulations 2
I Freelance VDA6.3 Auditor at TURKEY VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 1
M VDA 6.3 – Workshop for Certified Process Auditor VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 4
R CB/Auditor Requiring a change in scope ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
W Redacting Info Before Giving to Auditor ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
T Quality auditor legal right to see Board meeting minutes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
V Certified Auditor - Need of additional certification specific to industry ( GMPs) ASQ vs ECA vs others Professional Certifications and Degrees 1
V Internal Auditor Competency KPI IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
R American Petroleum Institute - Becoming an API Auditor Professional Certifications and Degrees 3
B Lowest cost way to pass Lead Auditor exam ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
B Internal Auditor Competency - Product Auditors Internal Auditing 9
U Internal Auditor not trained but done Audit for some process Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
Z Auditor Findings ISO 14001:2015 vs. 45001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
B IATF16949 audit requirement - Auditor request UCL and LCL must be show Xbar-R, IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7

Similar threads

Top Bottom