Avoiding an Ultrasound System HIPOT Test during Manufacture

P

Phloogy

#1
I am developing an ultrasound system and am looking to see if getting the power supply or the entire system UL certified will allow the device to skip HIPOT testing during manufacture. Is this a true statement? Is this a good idea? Any feedback is appreciated!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
I

isoalchemist

#2
Just because the system is approved doesn't mean you manufactured it correctly and no danger exists. Every computer we made had HIPOT testing and the tester was one of the first things checked every time UL (our electrical assessor) was in.
 
P

PaulJSmith

#3
Correct. The UL certification only approves the design based on the performance of the submitted sample unit. HIPOT testing will confirm that there are no failures during the manufacturing process on each individual unit.

I'm not sure why you would want to avoid it. That's a very important test, and takes only a few seconds to perform (takes longer to connect it than to test it).
 
P

Phloogy

#4
Thanks for the feedback! I agree, there may be issues/mistakes during manufacturing where HIPOT would be beneficial. We are looking to be as lean as a possible and cut out the non-value added steps.

This is something we are only considering if our PFMEA supports it. Ex. the occurrence of relevant failure modes are low... So if we need HIPOT as mitigation, then we will have it.
 
#5
Thanks for the feedback! I agree, there may be issues/mistakes during manufacturing where HIPOT would be beneficial. We are looking to be as lean as a possible and cut out the non-value added steps.

This is something we are only considering if our PFMEA supports it. Ex. the occurrence of relevant failure modes are low... So if we need HIPOT as mitigation, then we will have it.
Think of the risks along with the lean and non - value as you say of testing for safety.
If your product is going to be with a safety mark on it (Ex. UL mark) then the UL product file will contain what you are required to test on 100% of manufactured devices. Certainly it would contain the HIPOT, along with conditions of testing. The followup services inspection will be keen to see these records of devices made and dispatched.
 
#6
Remember that hipot (dielectric strength tests) only apply to solid insulations. Where insulation is provided by creepage and clearance distances it is evaluated by measurements.

Also, where the dielectric test of 60601-1 says that the high voltage should be maintained for 1 minute (with no breakdown) this is not suitable for a production test. Instead the high voltage should only be held for 5 seconds.

(The parts that I test for dielectric strength during a "Type Test" I consider to have invisibly damaged insulation and quarantine them from further use).

It is also worth realising that, particularly with modern power supplies and isolation systems, the value of a "front-to-back" dielectric test is very limited. When the patient isolation is comprised of several parts (so MOPPs are in more than one place) any high voltage applied from the power supply input to the applied parts will be (unevenly) divided across those insulations.

I now only do dielectric tests on component parts, although we do retain the test as a brief production test.
 
H

hcrook

#7
Additionally, IEC 62354 3.0 ed Annex K provides some guidance on production line hipot testing, such as having a 1 second hipot test duration at a higher voltage. 60601-1 also mentions in Subclause 5.1 that tests from this standard shouldn't necessarily be repeated, especially in regards to hipot. "Production tests need not be identical with TYPE TESTS, but can be adapted to manufacturing conditions and possibly invoking less RISK for the quality of the insulation or other characteristics important for BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE."
 

Candi1024

Quite Involved in Discussions
#8
Also keep in mind that 100% testing your product, MAY keep certain manufacturing steps from being "special". Special meaning that the output is not 100% verified. If they are special processes, you need to do process qualification. This may or may not apply to you.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
O Informational Scaling back internal audits due to corona virus while avoiding a NC Internal Auditing 7
M Avoiding Pitfalls in ISO 9001:2015 Transition - Free webinar Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
L Avoiding Recurrence of the Supplier?s Quality Problems Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
B Avoiding Rust on 410 Stainless Steel Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
C Guidance for avoiding human error Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 24
Claes Gefvenberg ISO 9001: Avoiding Over Documentation Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 26
A Avoiding mixup - Similar parts for two different customers QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
A Avoiding ISO 9000 Registration - Hiding behind 'Customer Wishes' ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
M Informational US FDA final guidance – Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
S South Korea Ultrasound Software Requirements Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
J Level of Concern - Ultrasound Medical Device Systems ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
J Shipping Liquids (Small Bottles of Ultrasound Gel) to Europe EU Medical Device Regulations 4
T Canada Device Licence of Accessory - Ultrasound Therapy Devices Canada Medical Device Regulations 4
S Internal Files for Medical Device Ultrasound System Licence Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
S The relationship between IEC 60601-2-18 and IEC 60601-2-37 - Ultrasound Project IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
L FDA issued new Guidance for Ultrasound Diagnostic Devices. 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T More on Biocompatible Ultrasound Gel ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
T Standard(s) used to Test Sterile Ultrasound Gel for use on Heart ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
F Protection from mains in a ME system IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
T What is a Quality Management System? Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
W Posting Non-Quality System instructions on the Production Floor Manufacturing and Related Processes 13
U FSC Due Diligence System (DDS) summary report... Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 0
T MDR PMS System Vs. Plan Vs. Procedures EU Medical Device Regulations 3
C. Tejeda Computer system validation approach for Minitab Statistical software Software Quality Assurance 7
M Sterile barrier system with outer protective packaging Symbol EU Medical Device Regulations 10
L ISO 11607-1 Packaging system validation Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News IATF Performance Complaint Management System (IATF CMS) within the IATF Database IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
J Cloud Based System Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 7
E Verifying our build system IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
D Class III license: Add new device to the license system Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
PQ Systems Recipe for Success! 10 Ingredients for a Healthy Gage Management System Using GAGEpack Software 0
T ISO quality system software such as MQ1 (which is what we currently use) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
I CQI-15 Welding System Assessment 2nd edition - Does not require Ultrasonic Welding anymore? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
A Product Update and executing only affected System Tests, leaving out unaffected ones IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5
L Language of quality system in case of FDA inspection US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
blackholequasar Validation of new ERP system ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
B Vision system process validation Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
W Strategy for determining which components from a system should be "ME EQUIPMENT" -- home healthcare environment IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
E Marketing, product and system requirements IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
Q Structure Technical File for a system EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S Documents belonging to Technical documentation to be stored in one file or spread in the QM system? EU Medical Device Regulations 9
PQ Systems Audit Prep – Time for a System Health Check Using GAGEpack Software 0
O Quality Management System Implementation framework and Gap analysis checklist Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
A Applying agile model for Computer system Validation Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
Q Change Control Numbering system Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
G RO/DI water system qualification Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
T Quality Management System Q1 and Q2 Interpretations Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO/CD 7101 Health Care Quality Management System Standard Hospitals, Clinics & other Health Care Providers 0
G Logging of a decision if a computerized system needs to be validated ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
P Does FDA require certification for quality system internal audit for auditor? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom