Search the Elsmar Cove!
**Search ALL of Elsmar.com** with DuckDuckGo Especially for content not in the forum
Such as files in the Cove "Members" Directory

Blank Fields on Manufacturing Work Instructions

M

Matt Murdock

#1
#1
We utilize a generic setup sheet( work instructions) for our machines. Some fields are not applicable for certain machines. Is it necessary for these fields to be identifed as "n/a" or can they just be left blank. This issue has causes us some confusion. Any input is greatly appreciated.
 
A

Al Dyer

#2
#2
Matt,

I don't see it as a major concern although it would be good to have a common methodology. Either on the form or corresponding procedure you could put some type of disclaimer:

ie

"All non-applicable fields must be filled in with N/A"

"Blank fields on this form are considered not applicable"

I think as long as there is a common understanding there would be no internal or external (registrar) concerns, if you can justify and document your position.

ASD...
 
D

Dan Larsen

#3
#3
Generally, I don't like blanks on instructional documents, but as Al mentioned just make sure your system is consistent and understood.

One other thought...you mention "confusion". It might be good to take a hard look at what's causing the confusion with a root cause analysis. Is the root cause a lack of uniform instructions or the presence of the blanks?
 
M

Matt Murdock

#4
#4
The confusion ( better term would be concern) relates to whether the blanks on these instructions can be viewed as a noncompliance by an external auditor.
 
D

D.Scott

#5
#5
Blanks are a big concern to our auditor. Sort of like the basketball ref who watches 3 seconds. We got a nonconformance for ONE. I don't like the idea of stating in the procedure that blank fields are to be considered as not applicable. What if the quality approval of set-up were left blank would it be not applicable? We are stressing that all blanks need to be filled in. If no data is applicable put N/A or - in the space. At least something to show it was addressed. BTW - has anyone else noticed that since "Concerns" were dropped, single observations have become nonconformances and "Opportunities" have become mandatory by next surveillance?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Y Blank Fields on CAPA Form Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
W Form Approval - Blank forms Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
A Should I call this ?Blank Template? a Work Instruction? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 11
M Textile Control Plan for Electric Blanket Factory Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 2
H Can 'Not Applicable' Fields on Forms be Left Blank? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
Similar threads
Blank Fields on CAPA Form
Form Approval - Blank forms
Should I call this ?Blank Template? a Work Instruction?
Textile Control Plan for Electric Blanket Factory
Can 'Not Applicable' Fields on Forms be Left Blank?
Top Bottom