Boeing new issue with 777X engine support

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
The Seattle Times published a story Monday, Aug 19, 2024 disclosing grounding of Boeing 777 x test plne fleet after discovering failed titanium engine strut.
The article is behind a paywall, so here is an abridged version.
"



DominicGates_web.jpg

By
Dominic Gates

Seattle Times aerospace reporter


Boeing said Monday that it has grounded its fleet of 777X test aircraft for inspections following discovery over the weekend of a failed component connected to the jet’s engine.

After one of the 777X test airplanes landed Friday in Hawaii, maintenance mechanics found damage in a structural part that links the engine and the airframe.

Inspections of the two other active 777X test planes found cracks in the same structure, according to a report in The Air Current, an online aviation news service that first reported the details Monday.

In a statement, Boeing said only that the damage on the plane in Hawaii was discovered “during scheduled maintenance” and that it is inspecting the other 777X test planes.

“Our team is replacing the part … and will resume flight testing when ready.”

The affected part is called a “thrust link,” a heavy titanium component. The thrust of the engine is transferred to the airframe through this link between the engine and where it is mounted on a pylon beneath the wings.


The thrust link is not part of the GE-9X engine that powers the airplane, but a Boeing-designed connector to the engine. This specific design is unique to the 777X.

The GE-9X is an enormous engine, weighing about 11 tons and featuring a front fan that’s more than 11 feet in diameter.

Each engine has two of these thrust links for redundancy, in case one were to fail.

The news is another setback for the 777X program. The jet was launched in 2013 and first flew in 2020, but certification of the jet by the Federal Aviation Administration has been repeatedly delayed.

The FAA last month finally cleared Boeing to begin test flights for credit. Now those flights are paused.

Boeing said it has informed the FAA and is sharing information with prospective 777X customers. Boeing recently said it aims to deliver the first 777X in 2025, five years behind schedule. But customers, including Gulf carrier Emirates, have already said before this latest problem that they don’t expect it until mid-2026.


In a note to investors Monday, Ken Herbert, a financial analyst with RBC Capital Markets, wrote that “Even if flight testing resumes in the near term, the current grounding could limit investor confidence in the [777X] program.”

In the spring of 2022, having built — in addition to four test jets — about 20 777Xs for customers (some are now stored nose to tail on an unused runway in Everett), Boeing paused 777X production until certification was closer. It resumed 777X production only late last year.

Herbert said if the new discovery causes production to halt again, that will slow Boeing’s cash flow recovery.

Of the four 777X test planes, only three are actively flying now. One is the jet in Hawaii; another is parked at Boeing Field; the third is in Everett."

I added Boldface to items which caught my eye as a "Prophet of Profit." It piqued my Quality curiousity and I wonder how my Quality colleagues around the world would conduct their root cause investigation and remedial/preventive action.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
I've been watching Boeing closely since they were a customer of my precision machininBoeing Qualityg company in the 1990s and had a minor win against them over a quality issue. Their problems have always been that they SAY "Quality," but they don't communicate commitment from management to front-line workers and vendors. Here's an eleven year old post of mine on Boeing:

 

optomist1

A Sea of Statistics
Super Moderator
great points Bev & Wes, sometimes sarcasm highlights the challenges they face..."but wait they (BA) self-reported this issue!"...this jolted the memory, maybe you folks can assist....A DC-10 in Chicago or Iowa? crashed due to a marginal/damaged/dubious thrust link on one of the wing engines??
 

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Leader
Admin
Wes! I haven't seen you here in a long time.

My dad was a Manufacturing Engineer for Boeing back in the mid 1970s. I remember overhearing him griping about management way back then. It seems it is ever thus.
 

ChrisM

Quite Involved in Discussions
From the information posted above...
The thrust link in question transfers thrust from the engine to the airframe.... there are two, one for redundancy in case one were to fail.

Makes me wonder...... if there are two, are they normally sharing the load, otherwise if one breaks (the one taking the full load) how is the full load transferred to the other one? If the load is normally shared between the two thrust links and one breaks, then the other is suddenly taking twice its normal load (and hence may be more prone to failure too?). There must be more to this than meets the eye, so to speak
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
I don’t understand the criticism here. The aircraft type is undergoing a certification program. Finding and reporting failure modes is exactly one of the goals. The real problem would be if they tried to conceal and hide the findings.
 
Top Bottom