Bulk Class II product sale to kit packers

M

MIREGMGR

#1
Does this situation present problems?

We make a broad family of Class II KKX and MMP sterile equipment covers, with fairly large product numbers. Some products are marketed under our name, and others are made to fit OEM equipment and are marketed by them. In the latter cases we probably are a Contract Manufacturer per FDA rules, though that status is muddied in some cases when the OEM expects us to have full unsupervised control of product design, product validation and process validation. We got our first 510(k) for products in this family in 1978, so our track record is pretty long. These products are normally single-pouch-packaged and EtO sterilized.

We are currently selling some of these products in bulk-packed non-sterile form to several kit packer customers. In some cases we can verify that fact from establishment registrations, but in other cases the kit packing activity and subsequent sterilization is captive within a hospital buying group, thus there is no further sale and no separate business to register.

It may be that some of these kit packers are selling their kits as Class I. Our 510(k)s for the products we provide are not applicable because we deliver in bulk non-sterile form, not consistent with the 510(k) product conditions. We don't have any reliable information as to our kit-packer customers' conditions of sale, regulatory compliance or sterilization validation.

Since our delivery is bulk, our products are not individually labeled. Generally we don't know what labeling is applied when they're in kit form, other than that the customer labels the kit without using our name.

Our understanding is that, like a Re-Labeler, a Re-Packager (FDA term for kit-packer) has full medical device regulatory responsibility, thus need not buy from a medical device Manufacturer. Of course, it happens that we are a Manufacturer, but the past assumption has been that we have no regulatory responsibility past our bulk delivery to these customers.

Anyone have any thoughts on this set of circumstances?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

Dash Jones - 2008

#3
Wow ! this is very very complicated item:

Essentially your company acts in the following manner:

1. Manufacturer: You have 510K for class II medical device that you sell under your own brand name.

2. Contract Manufacturer: Here you do have all the responsibilities of item #1. I dont believe that you have to worry at all. However, you have to have a clearly defined relationship with your client. This client is responsible for compliance with relevant sections of 21CFR820; which are distribution related, customer complaints, internal audits, supplier evaluation and audits etc. etc.

3. Component manufacturer: In the cases where you sell bulk non-sterile products to manufacturers who then sterilize them and use them; they are required to be in full compliance with 21CFR820 and maintain a relationship with you which is well defined (contractually). They are responsible for ensuring that you comply with their specifications ; which should be no problem for you as you have a 510K for the product and are presumably compliant with QSR.
Where you sell "components" to kit packers for internal use; you have no obligations at all. These customers only consume the product for internal use and have extemporanous preparation procedures; however, they do not market the product and dont place it in interstate commerce.

obviously there is lot more detail on each process that is needed; but this is the first cut from your message.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#4
The essential question I'm trying to ask, from a Management Review information-provision-responsibility perspective, is the extent to which we inherit additional quasi-legal compliance responsibilities when:

1. Our relationship with a particular OEM, Re-Labeler or Re-Packager customer doesn't cleanly fit into any of the FDA's grossly-oversimplified relationship categories; and

2. We are informally aware that our customer is not fully performing their end of the total regulatory picture.

I suppose it's really a legal question. Does anyone know of a regulatory-law forum? :cool:
 
W

WilliamS

#5
I know a couple of good firms in DC. My first choice would be Olson, Frank & Weeda. Ask for Stephen Turman - he's X-FDA General Council.
 
L

LeeFu

#6
I think you are an unfinished medical device (like component) manufacturer, and you have no regulation responsibility. In 21CFR820, FDA encourage but not enforce that the unfinished medical device manufacture having the quality system comply with the QSR.

Hope this information can help you
 
R

rakma

#7
I agree in this case you would be the contract manufacturer and are not required to comply with FDA regulations. However, it would be good to send a written correspondence to the customer or have a contractual agreement that they are responsible for fulifilling their FDA obligations.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#8
Thank you, LeeFu and rakma. However, my concern is not our compliance in regard to manufacturing operations, where the fact that in this instance the FDA would regard us as a Contract Manufacturer would be irrelevant since we make these products in a Manufacturer context.

Rather, our concern is what our legal responsibility may be if our customer is not complying with their legal responsibilities.

Regarding "...send a written correspondence to the customer or have a contractual agreement that they are responsible for fulifilling their FDA obligations", I want to manage our legal responsibilities without causing the Sales Department to put a contract out on me, if I can. :D

As a side note, a patient/user risk analysis isn't relevant here, because we don't have any reason to think any of our customers are not properly sterilizing their kits, and our products have full quality irrespective of how the customer sells them. The problem is only that if a kit containing a Class II device is sold as a Class I, FDA regulatory oversight doesn't happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
L

LeeFu

#9
hello Miregmg,

I suppose that I get the point.

If your customer perfome any activity on your product, like modification of the label or sterilization, then your act is the unfinished device manufacturer without regulation responsibility.

In the other case, if they perfome no activity on your product, keep your original label, and put your device in their kit, then you are the manufactuer with the regulation responsibility, and they might be considered as only a distributor of your product. In this case, they can sell your product in their Class I kit, cause your product has 510(k) number. So my recomendation is you shall sell them your sterilized product to comply with the 510(k) Submission.

Hope this information can help you.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#10
We probably don't need to pursue the OP question further, since it's had plenty of exposure, but I feel obligated to straighten out a couple of final misunderstandings for the benefit of those who might be reading.

If your customer perfome any activity on your product, like modification of the label or sterilization, then your act is the unfinished device manufacturer without regulation responsibility.

In the other case, if they perfome no activity on your product, keep your original label, and put your device in their kit, then you are the manufactuer with the regulation responsibility, and they might be considered as only a distributor of your product.
No, this is a misapprehension.

1. Kits of the sort in question normally involve kit packaging that precludes inclusion of components that are already individually packed in the sort of soft pouch or form-fill-seal packaging that is required for the EtO sterilization that is most common (and that we use) for sterile disposable equipment covers. That's one reason why the kit packer buys from us in bulk non-sterile form rather than in individually sterile-barrier-packaged sterile form.

2. Kits of this sort normally are prepared in cleanroom but non-sterile conditions, and in every case of which I'm aware, the multiple components are almost always all non-sterile at time of kit packing. It's almost always technically undesirable from a materials perspective, and possibly raises ISO10993-7 questions, to EtO sterilize tortuous-path-folded equipment covers more than once. Thus the kit packer needs to buy non-sterile components so that they can sterilize without creating additional problems for themselves.

3. Kit packers almost always are concerned with component cost, and sterile, barrier-packed components are significantly more expensive than bulk non-sterile components of the same type.

4. "Bulk" components inherently are not individually labeled, therefore are not consistent with the conditions of a 510(k) for their marketing in sterile, individually barrier-packed, individually labeled form.

Under normal conditions, it would be neither packaging-practical, nor product-sterilization-desirable, nor cost-effective for a kit packer to follow an operational path that would be consistent with them defining themselves as a Distributor per FDA definition.

In this case, they can sell your product in their Class I kit, cause your product has 510(k) number.
As mentioned in the OP and explained above, our 510(k) clearance does not apply to the bulk non-sterile version of our Class II equipment covers. And, I believe you are fundamentally incorrect in stating that it would be regulatory-legal-acceptable to sell a kit containing a legally marketable Class II device as a Class I. We are reasonably sure that such a kit should be FDA-Listed as Class II, and marketed as Class II.

Thank you for the input, though. Discussions of such issues always have the potential to help solve problems.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J Canada Bulk Packaging and IFU requirements for Class IIa and IIb Medical Devices Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
N Re-Packaging and Re-Labeling Bulk Lots of Class II Medical Devices 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
U Run & rate for bulk materials IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
S The perils of Bulk Packaging Customer Complaints 5
S Is FDA Establishment Registration for Bulk packaging Contract Manufacturers ? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
B Environmental Monitoring for Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing of Bulk Drug Substances Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
S Electronic (.xls or other) Bulk Material Checklist wanted APQP and PPAP 1
C PPAP Submissions for Thermoplastic Resins (Bulk Material) APQP and PPAP 3
G TS 16949 applicability for Bulk Material Product IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 25
P Bulk Material Requirements Checklist to send along with my PPAP APQP and PPAP 2
B Bulk Materials (Lead {Pb} Alloys) PPAP Requirements APQP and PPAP 5
D How is transport of Dangerous Goods (limited quantity) regulated for Bulk Transport? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 9
D Sample Sizes for 'Bulk' Fluids/ Materials (Polymer Synthesis Process) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
D Bulk Material Supplier Control Plans APQP and PPAP 2
0 Sample divider for PET flake bulk samples Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
R Is AQL sampling plans applicable for Bulk Pharmaceutical Manufacturing (API)? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
M For Bulk Material (eg. paint), are there any guidelines for Ford PPAP Requirements? APQP and PPAP 1
N Can I get a PPAP sample of Bulk Material (Plastic Resin)? APQP and PPAP 2
S Batch Traceability for Bulk Materials which are mixed in the Storage Tank IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
J We anneal aluminum tube (tier 2, bulk material) - Does CQI-9 apply to us? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Q Level of PPAP - Bulk Chemicals Supplier Requirements APQP and PPAP 2
C ISO 27001 and Bulk Email Policy - Your Thoughts, Please IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
A Are Steel & Resin Suppliers Bulk Material Suppliers - TS 16949 PPAP APQP and PPAP 6
J Incoming Inspection AQL Sampling of Bulk Textiles AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 3
S Gamma Sterilization: Change in Bulk Density vs. Revalidation 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T Gage R&R procedure for Bulk Chemicals Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
O Bulk Material PPAP - Design Matrix instead of a normal Design, Production FMEA APQP and PPAP 3
J Acceptance Sampling for Bulk Materials - Anyone knowledgeable about ISO 10725? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
G Setting up realistic Quality Objectives - Bulk Material Handling Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
B Unregistered Bulk Scrap Metal Suppliers - Do they need to be ISO 9001 certified? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A Calculating PPM for bulk-type product Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
C Bulk Materials PPAP - Is resubmission needed at line change APQP and PPAP 10
Casana Detection level in PFMEA (Process FMEA) - Bulk Fluids FMEA and Control Plans 10
P Raw materials as bulk materials (polymer, adhesive, etc) for PPAP IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
P Small parts trouble Kanban - Problems with the common small/bulk parts Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 8
P Bulk Material PPAP (Resin Suppliers) APQP and PPAP 3
G Bulk Material Sample Standard Retention APQP and PPAP 2
D Bulk Suppliers - Design FMEA Required? Aluminium ingots FMEA and Control Plans 10
K PPAP Requirements for Raw / Bulk Materials? APQP and PPAP 6
N "Bulk Materials Requirements Checklist" example request APQP and PPAP 1
R Bulk Material PPAP for PCB shop? What would be considered as bulk material? APQP and PPAP 5
P Bulk Materials PPAP / FMEA - Appendix F of the PPAP manual APQP and PPAP 1
M Calibration of Bulk Tank with Scale - Operating capacity is 3400lbs General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 20
Jim Wynne 4th Edition PPAP manual - Bulk Materials - Can you guess what this means? APQP and PPAP 12
D cGMP and Batch Integrity of Bulk Storage Tanks US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 8
M Bulk material vendor (supplier) change - PPAP resubmission? SAE J403 grade 1020 steel Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 6
S Mfg Process Control for Bulk Suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
G What is robust threshold range level? I.2.2.15 Bulk Material (Ap - F) APQP and PPAP 1
W DFMEA (Design FMEA) for Bulk Material - Resin for Plastic Injection Moulding FMEA and Control Plans 1
S Is ppm calculation valid or invalid for bulk materials? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom