Some of my comments -
- Consider swim lanes vertically to represent the involvement of various department who has a role in the processes being mapped.
- Draw all processes along the swim lanes
- Number each process
- Instead of Quality Objectives, I would prefer organization wide Objectives.
I did not see Quality Testing as a process too ?
My first question would be - who is this for? If it is for 9001 (to show "the sequence and interaction of processes") then most CBs will accept more or less anything in this format, and yours is better than most! But it is nigh impossible to show anything meaningful in 2 dimensions that will tell a reader any more than they knew already...
If on the other hand you want to explain to a new member of staff how you operate...
i) Do you have to buy everything you supply? (Ordering only goes to Procurement)?
ii) Do you actually "make" things? (You go from Production Planning straight to Preparation and Sorting)
iii) Does the Customer actually generate Sales Reports? (I would expect Invoicing to be triggered internally, and at an earlier stage)
iv) as with all these pictures, it is difficult to show anything meaningful with just a single "box" called Support Groups - after all, they are not processes but a mixture of departments and resources, which interact with each other as well as with the Core Processes you list.
Perhaps the most important question is "do your staff find this useful?". If not (and an external assessor accepts it), then I do wonder why ISO9001 asks you to produce it...
PS I am not sure that I agree with Ajit...
1&2 I like swimlanes, but it is difficult to use them at the "system map" level, since a process will typically involve more than one department. One benefit of "the process approach" is to avoid the "silo" (departmental) approach.
3 numbering the processes can imply a sequence / hierarchy, and I am not sure that this will help people to appreciate that the processes are all happening and interacting concurrently.
4 I like the way that your quality objectives "flow" from your higher level corporate objectives (Ajit seems to be saying the same thing in one way, but then the opposite!) You are showing what many of these pictures don't, ie that managing "quality" is part of "managing the business"