Button Test - Tactility Criteria

johnnybegood

Involved In Discussions
#1
Button Test - Tactility

There is this button test that we are performing on a radio. Recently we received customer complaint that while the radio is functional when depressing the button there is no tactility feel. Tactility is consider good if we can feel the 'spring effect' but we are not able to quantify this criteria as it's too human depended. Different operator may exert different finger force on the button. As such to some operator the radio button test is accept but to other is a reject.
How do I go about quantifying the tactility criteria?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
M

M Greenaway

#2
If it is a straightforward depressing of a button against a spring you could measure the force required to depress the spring, or if you know the stiffness of the spring do a simple calculation to determine the force required to depress it.
 

johnnybegood

Involved In Discussions
#3
The test is currently done by finger pressing the button. Beside tactility at the same time we are testing the functionalty of the radio. How can I control the force if it's done by using the first finger. I personally dont think the engineering can come out with a fixture.
 
G

Graeme

#4
Borrow energy's fish scale ...

How's this for one back-of-the-envelope minimal-cost suggestion?

  • Obtain a spring scale marked in the units of your choice (grams, ounces). I am thinking of the type where the top is held by a hand or fixture, and the mass to be weighed is suspended from the bottom. Ensure that the scale will work acceptably when held in a horizontal position.
  • Fasten the bottom of the scale (the load attachment point) to a fixed object.
  • Attach a plunger of a convenient size to the top of the scale. It could be arranged so that one end can be pushed by the finger and the other end contacts the radio button, and the spring scale is attached somewhere between. Details depend on the physical configuration.
  • Support the scale and plunger so they are horizontal and able to move freely. Place the radio so that the plunger is just barely touching the button when at rest. (The scale reads zero.)
  • Apply gradually increasing pressure to the plunger with the finger, so as to operate the radio button. Read the scale value when the radio changes state.
  • If a standard value and tolerance have been established then compare the result. Otherwise, experiment to determine optimum values.

I am sure the mechanical engineers can adapt this to read to several more significant figures and a cost of several more kilobucks ... :vfunny:


Graeme
 
M

M Greenaway

#5
Johnny

It dont take rocket science to determine how much force is 'good' force, and then select a suitable spring to achieve this, then you would not even have to do the so called tactility test !!
 

Mike S.

Happy to be Alive
Trusted Information Resource
#6
It may not be a simple matter of force, but force + a certain "feel" that the customer wants. Very hard to quantify and measure I'd think -- maybe one of things that you can't describe but you know it when you feel it. For example, I think of the trigger pull on a firearm. Two different guns may have the same trigger pull from the standpoint of the number of pounds of pull force required to make the firing pin drop, but the feel may be much different. One may release "crisply and cleanly" while the other may have lots of "creep". Maybe you find a button the customer likes, then just build future models in the same way with the same parts.:confused:
 
M

M Greenaway

#7
Mike

I take your point, but we arent talking about gun triggers. It appears that we are talking about a straight forward push in/out button. If you want a click on the button again that can be achieved through design, and should not need testing.

Maybe I am wrong, but I am picturing a small button that is depressed straight in by the tip of an index finger. If you want feel on this button all you can be talking about is the force exerted back on the finger tip, which is a straightforward selection of a suitable spring. If you need friction on the button tip then use a suitable polymer for the button material. If you want it to click design some mechanical click system at the end of the button stroke.

You cannot operate any SPC on an unquantifiable subjective attribute such as tactility - i strongly suggest you understand what tactility is better in the design of your button, and design in the tactility required !
 

Mike S.

Happy to be Alive
Trusted Information Resource
#8
Martin,

I'm picturing the same kind of button as you.

But... Who said there must be SPC on this attribute? SPC, is a really great tool, but it isn't for everything.

You said "If you want feel on this button all you can be talking about is the force exerted back on the finger tip..." I disagree. I think they are thinking about not just force, but rather force OVER TIME/DISTANCE. Thus my trigger analogy.

Your click and friction comments are valid I think.

Maybe Johnny could mount several types of available buttons on a board, have the customer pick one they like, and just use that button from now on -- hopefully something that is a standard part from a switch maker who can probably do all the tactility testing required and who understand it much better.

Johnny -- waddya say?
 
M

M Greenaway

#9
Mike

The thread was posted in the 'Statistics' section so I jumped to an assumption - sorry.

Johnny are we helping any ?
 

johnnybegood

Involved In Discussions
#10
I check with our engineering folks. The button consist a keypad and inside the button there is switch where a plunger pushes against a metal piece dome. And this result in the spring effect. The tactile feel is very subjective.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MDD_QNA Medical Device Software - Is a Help Button required? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
B IEC 60601-2-43 - Clause 203.6.103 - Physical button? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
A Torque Value for Different types of Fasteners (Socket Head, Button Head, CSK) Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
H Secondary button cells (LIR2540) in medical products Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
A Standards for Emergency Button for a Dental Laser IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
J Excel Macros - "Button" on a form that executes a macro Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 8
Jim Wynne How to save money on type 394 button-cell batteries Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
J PPAP - Same product, different color new PPAP? Small plastic button APQP and PPAP 3
R MSA for ATE (Automatic Test Equipment Embedded Software) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
D Test summary report example for design validation wanted - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
S Documenting Design Verification Test Results (ISO 9001) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
A Earth leakage current test for Permanently installed Large scale MEE IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
A Bench test report translation to English for 510(k) submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
J Production Line Test Brasil - High Voltage Dielectric Strenght Test Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 5
W Seeking Guidance Verification Test Strategy for Class B Medical Devices IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
J 510(k) for a control kit for an external IVD test kit 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
K Cord anchorage pull test IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
A IEC 60601-1 Dielectric Strength test for battery operated devices IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
M Minitab assistant: 1-Sample % Defective Test Using Minitab Software 1
N Is capability applicable for a destructive test? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 9
JoCam Failure to test Class I medical device to IEC 60601-1-11 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
K Dielectric strength test as per IEC 60601-1 -Infant incubator IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
M Test method validation - Is MSA (MSA1, MSA2, MSA3 and linearity) a good solution? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
B Operator protection - When to apply table 7, Dielectric strength test voltage IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
R Medical Device Airworthiness, DO-160 Test Planner IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
J Audit Finding For Not Retaining Test Results ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
W ASTM F1929 dye penetration test - Validation for in-house testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
S IVF medical devices standards and test methods Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
I Approved Suppliers ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and used test equipment ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
N Heavy tare to simulate high load in a routine sensitivity test of a floor scale? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
bryan willemot Looking for a certified test report for aerospace parts AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 0
A Information about Medical Device Test Laboratories Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 4
B Standard for Dielectric Strength Test IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
A Definition of customer in ITP (Inspection & Test Plan) Contract Review Process 3
J EN61010 Electrical Withstand Test IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 0
Z MDD ER 7.5, "phthalate test"? Aspiration tips EU Medical Device Regulations 3
G ISO 17025:2017 Uninterrupted chain of traceability for test laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
A Single use non-sterile syringe used in the oral cavity - Laboratory test advice US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
M Proper method to test flow of a regulator Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
C CQA Test Questions Bank General Auditing Discussions 1
G Is impact test according to IEC 60601-1 applicable for HAND-HELD equipment if also classified as BODY-WORN? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
Watchcat Identification of Test Sample in Test Reports? Design and Development of Products and Processes 22
S Safety Class A with no test? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
A IEC 60601-2-2 - Defib-proof test amendment to base standard IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
K The correct way of doing a 2 Sample T test Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7
J Good Documentation Practices Self Test? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
B EU: Alcohol test kits for breast milk IVDD EU Medical Device Regulations 2
D IEC EN 61326 Dated Standards - Dated standards for test protocols CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
K Electromagnetic Compatibility Test IEC 60601-1-2: 2014 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
A IEC 60601-1 Impact test on glass touch controller IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom