J
Randy Stewart said:
Having gone through this also, here's my 2 cents.
Why was the equipment there in the first place?
If it is being used what is it measuring?
Have there been any rejects that can be traced back to the equipment?
I'm sure you get the picture. If the equipment isn't being used - scrap it or have the person take it home. If it is for other projects and has nothing to do with QA then mark it. If it is being used for a QA measurement and no reject can be traced back to it, then what purpose does the measurment have?
Or is the equipement adequate enough.
Why was the equipment there in the first place?
If it is being used what is it measuring?
Have there been any rejects that can be traced back to the equipment?
I'm sure you get the picture. If the equipment isn't being used - scrap it or have the person take it home. If it is for other projects and has nothing to do with QA then mark it. If it is being used for a QA measurement and no reject can be traced back to it, then what purpose does the measurment have?
Or is the equipement adequate enough.
