Calibration 4.11 2c - Defining acceptance criteria for all equipment

W

Wendell Goodson

#1
Question?

Our Third party registrar LRQA has stated that we (my company) must define
the acceptance criteria for all equipment, in other words, define the actual
criteria for the standards to be used to such as the tolerance on the gauge
blocks that is to be used to calibrate a micrometer.

4.11.2 Control procedures
The supplier shall: c) define the process employed for the calibration of inspection, measuring, and test equipment, including details of equipment type, unique identification, location, frequency of checks, check method, acceptance criteria, and the action to be taken when results are
unsatisfactory;

We use an outside certified laboratory to perform our calibrations on items
such as scales, surface tables, and measuring instruments.

How are other companies doing this? I've never had to do this with DnV or ABS, is this just a LRQA requirement? I've always used a certified laboratory and placed their internal procedure on the purchase order, and
required that the out-of-tolerance be no more than 50% of the accuracy of the instrument without adjustment, (which is in our procedures and on the PO) and if out more than allowed by the instrument measuring accuracy the sub-contractor is required to report and state any adjustment they took and we will do all necessary corrective action inside to prevent our customers from receiving nonconforming
product. For those that want the response from LRQA let me know, "oh" Heck, I'll place it with this.

Regards

Wendell Goodson

LRQA's Response:
I have received your Email of today concerning LRQA's interpretation of
calibration controls.

I have not seen any paperwork from a visit to know the specifics but I can give
general comments, using a micrometer as an example.

1. You must define the acceptance criteria for the devices. We have seen
companies state the tolerances and method of calibrating, specifically call for
a specification (example ASTM) which gives method and tolerances or call for
another specification (such as your calibration lab's procedure which gives
method and tolerances).

2. If you accept a calibration lab's procedure and tolerances, you should have
a copy of it available to you to know what you are accepting. The tolerance
must be known as you accept the results of the external laboratory. You can
accept the work of the lab not subcontract the acceptance of the results.

3. When found to be out of your defined tolerance, a documented assessment of
the validity of previous inspection and test results must be performed
(4.11.2.f).

I hope this helps a bit. I can not give consultancy but you will have my email
address on receipt of this message and with more information, I can possibly
clarify some issues. The phone number is 281-398-7370 ext 211.


Richard Gensmer
Operations Manager.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#2
This level of detail expected is another pass-over from QS-9000. UL started pushing this a few of years back. Not so long ago the 'standard' was "...Is your equipment calibrated?" This served well for many if not most companies. However, failure investigations showed that this was insufficient for many companies. I fell to the old notion and at first, in fact, resisted this new 'level of understanding' as most of my clients had an internal person who understood measurement systems analysis. Many companies, however, did not have anyone who actually understands the entire concept. QS9000 addressed the issue with their requirements.

Registrars have been increasingly enforcing, if you will, the requirement details. QS registrars, back when QS came out, were only interested in whether you had a solid calibration program but pretty much limited their questioning to "...Is your equipment calibrated?" As time passed UL was first to really 'put the screws' to companies doing the QS dance to comply with the higher requirement of, well, having a good understanding of all the details involved.

As I said, I first resisted this tightening of the requirement, so to speak.

This evolution could be followed in Greg Gogates wonderful list-serve as more and more suppliers of calibration services were bombarded with 'requirements' from their customers (particularly QS customers). Discussions included all the extra work involved. Some discussions centered about costing and the neccessity to increase fees as more and more customers asked for copies of calibration procedures. In addition, a chorus was heard from cal services suppliers wherein they charged that many customers were, in fact, quite ignorant of the overall process including their specific needs. The 1998 revision of QS caused a real commotion and, as many here found, they could not even find a supplier of cal services who were compliant to guide 25 or whatever.

In all this what we see is an evolution of the requirement to calibrate M&TE to a requirement that someone in a company understand the whole of the situation.

In all this is needed, I now admit. Enforcement has evolved as well. This might in part be due to the lack of understanding of measurement systems analysis by the auditors themselves. But this goes into an often observed ignorance of so many auditors of what they are auditing - which I won't pontificate on right now.

It appears you are complying to LRQA's response #1. Response 2 is pretty self explainatory and it appears you comply with response 3.

Now - did the auditor say you are not in compliance? If so, what specifically?
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#3
For those of you not following Greg's List serve:

To: iso25
Subject: Re: 4.11 2c RE4

In a message dated 6/26/00 2:06:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time, XXXX writes:

<< My Question is: How can a company like GTM Plastics specify a standard to
>be used in calibration of an instrument such as a CMM?

ANSI/ASME B89.4.1 - 1997 is the standard you are looking for. >>

Or, if you prefer, you can ask that it be measured in accordance with ISO 10360-2.

Ralph C. Veale
408 Orlando Avenue #10 A
Ocoee FL 34761
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#4
And:

Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:45:44 -0400
From: Philip Stein <[email protected]>
To: Greg Gogates <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 4.11 2c RE3

Response to

>
>From: Wendell Goodson <[email protected]>
>To: Greg Gogates <[email protected]>
>Subject: 4.11 2c

>However, we use an outside calibration service to conduct the calibration on
>our surface plates, CMM, and other instruments that we do not have the
>capability or the environment to perform this type calibrations. We are very
>careful in our selection of our calibration services ensuring that they are
>a certified lab and ISO-9002 certified.
>
>My Question is: How can a company like GTM Plastics specify a standard to
>be used in calibration of an instrument such as a CMM?

ANSI/ASME B89.4.1 - 1997 is the standard you are looking for.

>We see the
>calibrations Labs procedures and call it out on the Purchase Order to them,
>however we do not have the slightest idea of the tolerance used to
>manufacture this standard. What good are the labs if the certification to
>A2LA or ISO. This is not value added. We always put in the Purchase Order
>to the Lab a requirement to notify GTM when the instrument is out of
>tolerance or when there is adjustment. There is not a calibration laboratory
>in the country that will part with the individual procedures, their QA
>Manual yes but not the individual procedures.

There are quite a few labs that will share their procedures. Many of
them are public, and are published by GIDEP, NavAIR, etc.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Defining ISO17025 Calibration Laboratory Technical Competency ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
D Internal Laboratory - Defining the Laboratory Scope - Inspection, Test, Calibration Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 18
B UV-A and Illuminance meter Calibration Setup General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
S Calibration Related Posters General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
F Quality Control in Electrical Calibration ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
C Narrow definition of IMTE or calibration possible? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
dhuot1990 In-House Calibration Program - Biotech Industry General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
M Reference part calibration or verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
M Calibration of equipment IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Q Gage calibration / tracking software General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
C Should resolution be included in uncertainty budget for digital caliper or micrometer calibration? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 5
S Calibration Due date-Critical Connie General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16
Q Request Calibration Info Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 16
R Calibration Log - Archive Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
U Calculate acceptance of equipment reading after calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
D Question on Documented Calibration versus ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
U Calculate acceptance of calibration reading Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
D Air hood calibration ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
K Ground Bond Test for Class I Medical Electrical Equipment - calibration problems IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
E Calibration/Verification Report Durometer ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
S Medical device equipment calibration Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
J Scrap Material Scale Calibration Required? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 21
S 7.1.5.2.1 Calibration/Verification Records IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
K Is Calibration Required for Non-Adjustable Commercial Inspection Devices? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
F Calibration in GPC/SEC General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
Q Changing calibration frequency Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 18
M IATF 16949 SI # 10: Integrated self-calibration of measurement equipment- Needs for explanation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M Storing Calibration Certificate Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
B Risk analysis for defective measuring or measuring equipment out of calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
S Placing a calibration sticker with someone other than your initials Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 8
J IATF 16949 Calibration/Verification records question ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 6
M Approval of Calibration Certificates General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
lanley liao Question regarding the calibration of monitoring and measure equipment. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 3
N IATF Calibration Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 5
Q Do these certificates of calibration meet ISO 9001 requirements for traceability to NIST? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
T Plug Gage Calibration Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 1
M Load Cell Calibration using a totalizer on a flow meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
E Calibration Records needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
D Limited Range Calibration - 5000 lb Industrial floor scale General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D Calibration of Small Scales General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 32
C How to Establish the Calibration & Measurement Capability (CMC)? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
I IQOQ or just initial calibration required? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Calibration in real life ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Calibration cycle for monitoring & measuring tools used in medical device manufacturing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
A Is calibration of test weight required General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Calibration Frequency for Slip Gauge Kit used for CMM Calibration? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
S Calibration/Verification of customer fixtures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Ron Rompen Calibration by manufacturer ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
Q Calibration verification records 7.1.5.2.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom