Calibration Certificate Contents: How to report Measurement Uncertainty?

Does the certificate meet ISO 17025 requirements for measurement uncertainty?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • No

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • It depends (post explanation)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

howste

Thaumaturge
Super Moderator
#1
ISO 17025 experts: Does the attached calibration certificate meet the ISO 17025:2005 uncertainty reporting requirements? If yes, please explain how. If no, please explain why not.
ISO 17025:2005 said:
5.10.4 Calibration certificates

5.10.4.1 In addition to the requirements listed in 5.10.2, calibration certificates shall include the following, where necessary for the interpretation of calibration results:

b) the uncertainty of measurement and/or a statement of compliance with an identified metrological specification or clauses thereof;
 

Attachments

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#2
Well, reluctantly I marked yes.:tg: Reluctant due to:
  1. They list an explanation of k factor and such but don't give an uncertainty
  2. They reference a MIL spec that has been dead and gone for years
  3. They could have easily listed the tolerances
I don't find where they are non-compliant.



The basis of my opinion is that they say they work against Handbook 44. The handbook lists all the applicable test points/tolerances. In addition the handbook specifies what tolerance weights they should be using (from Handbook 44):

N.2. Verification (Testing) Standards.



- Field standard weights used in verifying weighing devices shall comply with

requirements of NIST Handbook 105-1 (Class F) or the tolerances expressed in Fundamental Considerations, paragraph

3.2. (i.e., one-third of the smallest tolerance applied).

I really think they should list the uncertainty of their weight/weighing process, but I cannot state it as a requirement.


Outside of the compliance issue, I would return this form back as unacceptable. Regardless of 17025, I think a commercial calibration lab can do a little better. :)


 

howste

Thaumaturge
Super Moderator
#3
Well, reluctantly I marked yes.:tg: Reluctant due to:
  1. They list an explanation of k factor and such but don't give an uncertainty
  2. They reference a MIL spec that has been dead and gone for years
  3. They could have easily listed the tolerances
I don't find where they are non-compliant.

The basis of my opinion is that they say they work against Handbook 44. The handbook lists all the applicable test points/tolerances. In addition the handbook specifies what tolerance weights they should be using (from Handbook 44):

I really think they should list the uncertainty of their weight/weighing process, but I cannot state it as a requirement.
Thanks for your response. :bigwave:

So they are not required to state the uncertainty value on the certificate. Are they required to have the uncertainty values recorded somewhere in the company records? Does the k factor statement on the certificate have any purpose without the uncertainty value?
Outside of the compliance issue, I would return this form back as unacceptable. Regardless of 17025, I think a commercial calibration lab can do a little better. :)
By the way, I'm in no way connected with the lab that produced this certificate. I'm looking for education about what's really required/not required. What do you find unacceptable?
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
There is neither uncertainty provided nor an inclusion of an accepted metrological specification, and no reference to the specifications necessary to determine whether the item is in tolerance even though the statement is made that it is.

Not compliant.
 

howste

Thaumaturge
Super Moderator
#5
There is neither uncertainty provided nor an inclusion of an accepted metrological specification,
Thanks Hershal. :bigwave:

What would be an accepted metrological specification?

and no reference to the specifications necessary to determine whether the item is in tolerance even though the statement is made that it is.

Not compliant.
I believe the tolerance specifications are listed in NIST Handbook 44. Is that unacceptable?
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#6
There is neither uncertainty provided nor an inclusion of an accepted metrological specification, and no reference to the specifications necessary to determine whether the item is in tolerance even though the statement is made that it is.

Not compliant.
I was hoping you would chime in.:tg:

The 17025 does not mandate an uncertainty must be listed. Does it?:)

The metrological specification is listed in Handbook 44, that states the acceptable tolerances, test points, and other.

The one thing that I don't see that I think Handbook 44 specifies is corner load tests. I don't see any evidence of it.
 

howste

Thaumaturge
Super Moderator
#7
There is neither uncertainty provided nor an inclusion of an accepted metrological specification
I found this in a post you made in 2004. Is it what you're talking about?
There is one basic rule. It is that uncertainty must be reported unless there is an accepted Metrological equivalent. In the U.S. the equivalent is the 4:1 rules, specified in ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994, section 10.2.b. A U.S. based calibration lab can avoid reporting specific uncertainties IF a 4:1 can be maintained for the affected calibration area, AND the lab can put the evidence on the table for the accrediting body.
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#8
So they are not required to state the uncertainty value on the certificate.
Thus my question to Hershal. I think you should, but I don't see the must. Seeing how this is being verified to a known, validated standard (Handbook 44), I don't see how uncertainties are required.

Does the k factor statement on the certificate have any purpose without the uncertainty value?
The k factor statement is a explanation of the given uncertainty value and it's range; given the stated probability. It is essentially gibberish, without the stated uncertainty.

What do you find unacceptable?
Pretty much the entire document. Honestly, I'm answering the question surgically as I read 17025. However, my first response is the same as Hershal's. :yes::agree1:Reject the document.

Unacceptable? The MIL spec. reference, a k factor with no uncertainty listed, no tolerances given, no statement of accuracy or uncertainty for standards.

This document is better than most I've seen. However, with the 17025 on the certification sheet, they should be turning in a Lexus; not a Kia, to the customer.:D
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#9
I found this in a post you made in 2004. Is it what you're talking about?
Good find. I would agree with that, except for this instance. In that the Handbook 44 specifically states the class weight tolerance to use for scales (Class F).

NOTE: I'm more trying to pick Hershal's brain, more than anything. That way, he'll have something to lecture me about if I get to see him next week at the conference. :tg::lol::lmao:

But seriously, the requirement of uncertainty on a calibration is a legitimate (and often debated) question.:agree1:
 

howste

Thaumaturge
Super Moderator
#10
Perhaps I should go to the conference so I can pick both of your brains. Oh wait, I'm already scheduled to attend the AS9100 AATT training next week. Has anybody figured out cloning technology yet so I can go to both?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Marc Required Calibration Certificate Contents General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Calibration Certificate Result issued by an accredited external laboratory General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
F Calibration certificate content - Average Value and True Value ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
M How to read a calibration certificate for thermo hygrometer General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
V Calibration certificate verification Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
A Calibration Certificate Results General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
E Calibration Certificate Content Requirements General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
G Is the calibration due date of equipment used to be on calibration certificate ISO 17025 related Discussions 38
G Calibration Certificate, fancy paper or not? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
Crusader Certificate of calibration from Manufacturer allowed? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14
T Calibration Certificate Readings After Adjustment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
C Calibration Certificate "As Found" condition - TS16949 Section 7.6.2 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
M ILAC Regulations - Expression of Units on the Calibration Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
A Coverage factor in calibration certificate for a multimeter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
N Client Request for Reference Equipment Calibration Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
T Microsoft Access Database to create a Simple Calibration Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
V How to use a Calibration Certificate in Uncertainty Calculation for a Test Measure Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 13
T Uncertainty in Hygrometer Calibration Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
O How can I use reading from calibration certificate in measurement Calibration Frequency (Interval) 7
K New Gauges calibration certificate shows deviations from the measurement uncertainty IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
Q Can we go by different Calibration Frequency vs. What's on the Certificate ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R Torque Tester Calibration Traceability and Certificate question ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
S No Calibration Due Date on a Calibration Certificate unless requested by a customer? Calibration Frequency (Interval) 9
P Rounding Uncertainty to Zero on a Calibration Certificate Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 7
N Calibration Lab unable to issue Accredited Certificate when error is too high? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
S How to Evaluate a Calibration Report Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
R LCP 01201P and ICPF2P Calibration Methods Stated in Calibration Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M ILAC p14:12/2010 - Accredited Calibration Certificate Uncertainty General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
A Can any organization issue a Calibration Certificate? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
A No Uncertainty Listed on Calibration Certificate: Is it traceable calibration? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
M External Calibration Certificate Review ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
N Calibration Certificate Requirements for Pressure Gauges General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
A Fluke Digital MultiMeter Calibration Traceability and Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
S Reference to original Calibration Certificate - ISO 17025 Section 5.10.9 ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
C Accredited Calibration Certificate Content - ISO 17025 Section 5.10.4.2 Question ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
D Calibration Certificate - 'test report shall not be reproduced except in full' General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
howste Condition of Item Calibrated - ISO 17025 Clause 5.10.2f - Calibration Certificate ISO 17025 related Discussions 13
C Interpreting Outside Laboratory Calibration Certificate Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3
A Calibration Certificate content for New Equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
R What to do after I receive a calibration certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
E Calibration - Manufacturer's Calibration Certificate Date ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
S Verification of calibration certificate Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 1
B ISO 17025 logo & ISO 9001 logo on calibration certificate/report ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
P Certificate of Calibration Suppliers for an ISO 9001 company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
S Validity of 7 Year Old Calibration Certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 19
BradM Certificate for In-House Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 25
Wayne Never put an Expiration (Due) Date on a Calibration Certificate Calibration Frequency (Interval) 41
J In-House Calibration Certificate wording - Confidence Level or Level of Confidence? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom