Calibration Service Suppliers refuse NIST reference numbers on C of C

A

aavtqa

#1
My employer is currently doing business with a Calibration Service Supplier who refuses to include an NIST reference number on the C of Cs they provide.
The supplier states that their "Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005" makes the NIST reference number unnecessary and adds "excess" cost to their process. They go on to state that no longer providing NIST reference numbers on C of Cs is the trend with Labs who are accreditated to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and AL2A.

My registrar still expects an NIST number. May I have your comments?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#2
I've never heard of such a thing. Maintaining traceability is a basic requirement, and including evidence on certificates is standard practice. If your PO states that NIST traceability is required, they have to provide the evidence. You might want to tell them you're going to ask their AB what they think about the practice.
 

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#3
Good day aavtqa,

You didn't say what standard you operate to. ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 don't have specific requirements for traceability, but ISO 9001, 7.6a) says measuring equipment shall be calibrated/verified against measurement standards traceable to international or national measurement standards. TS 16949 shares this requirement. Then there's what your customer expects.

I would find the calibration lab's response unacceptable and would seek a lab that provides traceability.

That said, I have seen some certificates that list a test method as traceability for an entire set instead of listing the single standards, usually for scales. When asked, they should be able to fax evidence of that set's calibration, which usually does include serial numbers. Does the lab list a test method for traceability?
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#4
Actually, the position given by the Calibration provider has merit. Refer to this posting by A2LA

http :// www. calibrationservice .com/PR7799PolicyNIST.htm - LONG DEAD LINK

The NIST Calibration Program often receives calls to verify the authenticity of a NIST Report of Test number appearing on another organization's report. Although NIST can verify the authenticity of its report numbers, having an authentic number does not provide assurance or evidence that the measurement value provided by another organization is traceable. Not only should there be an unbroken chain of comparisons, each provided measurement should be accompanied by a statement of uncertainty associated with the farthest link in the chain from NIST, that is, the last facility providing the measurement value. NIST does not have that information; only the facilities that provided the measurement values to the customer can provide the associated uncertainties and describe the traceability chain.
And this from the NCSL (same link):
Test report numbers issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the United States Department of Commerce are intended to be used solely for administrative purposes. Although they are often used to uniquely identify documents which bear evidence of traceability, test report numbers should not be used nor required as proof of the adequacy or traceability of a test or measurement.​
Instead of focusing on the NIST test numbers, verifying the actual traceability chain is far more important. I would present this information to your registrar and see if they are willing to engage A2LA on it.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jen Kirley

Quality and Auditing Expert
Staff member
Admin
#7
Actually, the position given by the Calibration provider has merit. Refer to this posting by A2LA

http ://www. calibrationservice. com/PR7799PolicyNIST.htm - LONG DEAD LINK


And this from the NCSL (same link):
Instead of focusing on the NIST test numbers, verifying the actual traceability chain is far more important. I would present this information to your registrar and see if they are willing to engage A2LA on it.​
I like A2LA's guidance pages. :agree1:

But I want to take care not to muddle these two factors because the original question seemed to be about refusing to provide any traceability at all. For the record, the test reports I have seen referenced were to the states' Departments of Weights and Measures. As with calibration labs, they indicated which individual standards did not pass. These test methods were listed in the place where standard(s) used for calibration would be listed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#8
I like A2LA's guidance pages. :agree1:

But I want to take care not to muddle these two factors because the original question seemed to be about refusing to provide any traceability at all. For the record, the test reports I have seen referenced were to the states' Departments of Weights and Measures. As with calibration labs, they indicated which individual standards did not pass. These test methods were listed in the place where standard(s) used for calibration would be listed.
:yes::agree1:

There must be evidence given for traceability.
 
J

JAltmann

#10
I like A2LA's guidance pages. :agree1:

But I want to take care not to muddle these two factors because the original question seemed to be about refusing to provide any traceability at all. ...
I disagree, the lab stated they followed 17025-2005 and that adding the remarks of NIST tracability numbers to the reports was NVA. Most tend to misconstrue what "tracability to NIST" (or other national primary lab) really means. Most any set of gage blocks is tracable to NIST, although that line could be about 10 steps long. What value does that truly offer?

In the case of the lab, they most likely have a many reference standards used for calibrating the equipment used to calibrate the tools for customers. Most would not wish to actually pay the associated overhead costs involved referencing the actual national lab reference reports on each individual cert or C of C.

If the individuals PO specifically (not buried in T&C boilerplate) had the requirement and the lab did not perform then I think they have a legal issue.

Previously posters mentioned ISO9000, TS16949 requirements for tracability, which they do, but they do not specifically state how it must be documented. If audited the lab should be able to show the tracability as objective evidence to the auditor.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J Calibration Service Suppliers must be certified to ISO 9001? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14
B Will you please help me with my academic project? Repair & calibration service for test equipment ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
S Nationwide (USA) Calibration Service Provider Reccommendations wanted General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
N Need Calibration Service for Mechanical Tester - Zwick Roell General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
A Evaluation of Service Providers such as Consultants and Calibration Companies 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
C Flow Meter Calibration - Outside Calibration Service vs. In-House Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
P Record Retention requirements of Calibration and Verification Service Providers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
S Setting up a Scale Calibration Service lab - Where to start? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
A Calibration Service in Athens, GA? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J 3-D Surface Analyzer Service (Zygo) - Third Party Maintenance and Calibration General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
J Calibration service requirements for device manufacturers - ISO 13485 requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
V ESD testers and providing calibration service - 7.6.3.2 External Laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
K When we could use manufacturer for calibration service? (ISO TS 7.6.3.2) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
P Are we required to register to REACH? Small CMM service and calibration company RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 3
S Calibration System was In-House now Outside (External Service Provider) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14
H Calibration Service Provider Evaluation & Approval General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D Manufacturer' Service Provider - Calibration of inspection test equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
R 17025 Calibration Requirements - External calibration service cannot calibrate ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
Q CMM Calibration Certification - Small CMM Calibration Service General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
lanley liao Question regarding the calibration of monitoring and measure equipment. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
N IATF Calibration Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 3
Q Do these certificates of calibration meet ISO 9001 requirements for traceability to NIST? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
T Plug Gage Calibration Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 1
M Load Cell Calibration using a totalizer on a flow meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
E Calibration Records needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
D Limited Range Calibration - 5000 lb Industrial floor scale General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D Calibration of Small Scales General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 26
C How to Establish the Calibration & Measurement Capability (CMC)? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
I IQOQ or just initial calibration required? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Calibration in real life ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Calibration cycle for monitoring & measuring tools used in medical device manufacturing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
A Is calibration of test weight required General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Calibration Frequency for Slip Gauge Kit used for CMM Calibration? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
S Calibration/Verification of customer fixtures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Ron Rompen Calibration by manufacturer ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
Q Calibration verification records 7.1.5.2.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
W Next Calibration Due Date Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
S Where do l get calibration standards to run a calibration lab? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
A OEM On-Site Calibration issues during Covid19 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Calibration Certificate Result issued by an accredited external laboratory General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
G Calibration of "Master Parts" Used as Gauges Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
R Calibration lab environmental monitoring General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
G Calibration of Rotronic probe but not digital readout? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
F Standard Calibration Procedures: Recommended Practice ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
T Temperature Requirements For In House Calibration - AS9100 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 16
B Gage calibration frequency, ISO and IATF - What are the requirements Calibration Frequency (Interval) 3
Crimpshrine13 Laboratory Scope - Calibration vs. Test Methods - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Crimpshrine13 Calibration of pH Meter Probe Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom