SBS - The best value in QMS software

Calibration/Verification Records (IATF 16949 7.1.5.2.1)

J
#1
Morning all,

I have a query regarding the IATF 16949 7.1.5.2.1 cause (Calibration/Verification Records).

I've been helping out a sister site of ours (same business entity, just a different site down the country) in getting a measurement gauge ordered for a new project we are starting. The gauge allows you to locate a part, clamp in position, and then measure the gaps with a Go / No Go gauge, and also allows you to measure the part with a DTI. You move the DTI to various position across the gauge to get the measurement - i'm sure most of you from the Automotive world will have used something similar.

Anyway, my query is regarding the calibration and verification records of the new gauges.

The Go / No Go gauges have been added to the system as we have the measurement reports that are the "verification records", these will then be calibrated on a yearly basis internally.

However, the representatives at the sister site who is responsible for inputting all the gauges into their gauge database will not input the DTI into the system due to "not having the information regarding calibration". I'm being told i need a calibration certificate for the DTIs. These DTIs are from Mitutoyo, and they supply various bits of documentation, one of which contains the sentence
"This product conforms to the MITUTOYO inspection standard, and the standard(s) used for calibration is/are traceable to the national(international) standard(s)"

For me, this is the verification/calibration record of the DTI, and therefore can be input into the system on this basis. I do not feel this would cause an issue with an auditor.
Again, there is a procedure in place to calibrate the DTIs internally on a yearly basis.

Am i correct in what i think? Or have a misunderstood this completely!?

It would be much appreciated to get some input on this situation from some with extensive knowledge on this subject!

Thanks,

Josh
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

SamuelB

Starting to get Involved
#2
You would still need to calibrate the instrument on a regular basis, which in your case is once a year (it can be more or less, depending on your circumstances). The traceability to international/national standards can be obtained by using slip gauges that have been checked by a laboratory that is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 or equivalent. You can do the DTI check yourself using the gauges, just be sure that you have a properly defined laboratory scope.

That's how we did it ourselves in the case of ISO 9001.
 
#3
Josh - you will need some data which shows the DTI is, for example, linear and so on. Mitutoyo's paperwork isn't useful and they don't (in my experience) provide calibration results unless you ask/pay for them. If you can get that done internally, great. As far as keeping an auditor happy - wrong goal. Your aim, as with all measuring devices is to ensure they are fit for the purpose they're used for. Keeping an auditor happy is almost impossible, because you have no idea what they know about calibration etc.
 

dwperron

Trusted Information Resource
#4
For IATF 16949 compliance (7.1.5.3.2) the calibration results from an outside lab that must "have a defined scope that includes the capability to perform the required inspection, test, or calibration, and either
* the laboratory shall be accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 or national equivalent...
* there shall be evidence that the external laboratory is acceptable to the customer"

Mitutoyo's calibration laboratories meet this requirement. Their factories...... if you can produce evidence that the lab is acceptable to your organization (and document the evidence) you are compliant.

The safe bet is to calibrate the DTI. Is the heartburn worth the calibration cost?
 

Scanton

Wearer of many hats
#5
I'm definitely on the side of calibrating the DTI's.

We are a small company (less than 50 employees) and have 5 mitutoyo DTI’s on site that are used for various component measurement and machine validation tasks. All 5 for these are purchased with a calibration certificate from a UKAS certified calibration lab and sent for calibration (to a UKAS certified calibration lab ) annually.

I know the DTI’s come with documentation from Mitutoyo however we have never used this as evidence of traceability to a national standard.

I know there is a technical argument to use the documentation that comes with the DTI from Mitutoyo that may be tangibly acceptable, however I personally like my calibrations documentation to come from a source that doesn’t require argument, as it speaks for itself :).
 
J
#6
Well thank you for the replies, it is very much appreciated!

It seems I may have misunderstood the standard! I believe this probably stems from the fact that my site has been using the Mitutoyo documents as calibration/verification evidence for a long period of time with no issues during audits. I've spoken to some other colleagues who deal with our gauges, and as far as i could see, we have not calibrated a DTI until a year after purchase.

However, after reading everyone reply, it do now agree that it we would be better off calibrating the DTI to make sure we are 100% compliant to the standard. Since we have the capabilities & resources to do this in house, it would seem daft not to use them!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Q Calibration verification records 7.1.5.2.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
E IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.2.1 - Calibration and Verification Records Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
J IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.2.1 - Gauges (Measuring Jigs) Calibration/Verification Records IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
M Clarification on Calibration/Verification Records 7.1.5.2.1d (IATF 16949) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
B Calibration/Verification Records - IATF 16949 section 7.1.5.2.1 f) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
P IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.2.1 "Calibration/Verification Records" Interpretation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
G TS-16949 7.6.2 ? Calibration/Verification Records - Assessment of the Impact IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
K Calibration and Verification Records - TS 16949 Clause 7.6.2 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
C Calibration/verification records - New gage certificate as calibration evidence General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S TS 16949 Clause 7.6.2 Calibration Verification Records Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 7
S Calibration/Verification of customer fixtures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
T Calibration or Verification -> Cm and Cmk, etc. Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 3
M Calibration or Verification? What terminology to use ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
V Calibration certificate verification Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
G Assigning a calibration tolerance - An x-y coordinate machine - Uncertainty as my verification tolerance General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
D How to set equipment calibration/verification criteria General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
S Calibration and Verification requirement for foreign EASA Part 145 EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 7
J Pneumatic & Electrical Torque Tool - Calibration/Verification of 'Power Tools' General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
Q Using Caliper A to verify Caliper B - Verification of Calibration ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
K Verification instead of calibration?(ISO 9001:2008) Calibration Frequency (Interval) 10
K "Verification of Calibration" - CMM arm General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
I Verification or calibration Fluke 8508a with 5720a? TUR not 4:1? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
Q Number of Calibration Verification Points - Calipers, height gages, etc General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
A Calibration/Verification of thermo-hygrometer in storage areas ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
G Is this Calibration or Verification ? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
D How Working Standard Calibration result use in Verification of Equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
M Calibration Certification Qualification vs. Verification by Uncertified Staff General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
A Torque Wrench Calibration/Verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 24
G BRC (British Retail Consortium) - Calibration vs. Verification Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 4
J Balance Calibration Verification question General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
J Log Book for Analytical Balance Calibration Verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
Uriel Alejandro How to Record Evidence for Verification/Calibration of Equipment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
M Establishing Ranges for Weights for Calibration Verification of a Micro-Balance Calibration Frequency (Interval) 1
H Analytical Balance Calibration and Verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
D Precision Balance Verification and Calibration Process General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D Equipment Verification and Calibration Report Standard General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
P Record Retention requirements of Calibration and Verification Service Providers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
P Is it compulsory to send new measuring equipment for calibration / verification? Calibration Frequency (Interval) 3
D Calibration vs. Verification and Measurement Device Labeling General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
M Basis used for Calibration or Verification of Measuring Equipment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
D For Reference Only or Calibration/Verification - Tape Measures for cutting bar stock ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
M Methods for Verification/Calibration of Video (Optical) Extensometer General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
C Updating our Laboratory Calibration / Verification Procedures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
R Verification vs. Calibration and what to do with the results of each General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Difference between Calibration & Verification and How to calibrate Go/No Go gauge? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
S Audit and Calibration question - does verification alone meet the requirements? General Auditing Discussions 5
D Calibration vs. Verification - Can we calibrate dial indicators in-house? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
P Internal Calibration or Verification - Personnel Requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S Verification of calibration certificate Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom