Can Design & Dev (7.3) Be An Exclusion For A Facilities-based Service Company?

A

advega

#1
Hi. By "faciliteis-based" I mean companies who sell the use of their facilities. Think of a hotel, or (in my particular case) a funeral parlor.

Since the facilities are already in-place, is there really any design & dev to be done?

Of course the company could undertake (no pun intended) a facilites overhaul or even invest in new facilities, where the design/development activity would be intense. But since that wouldn't be an everday thing, could a funeral parlor exclude 7.3 in its entirety?

Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts!
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Hi. By "faciliteis-based" I mean companies who sell the use of their facilities. Think of a hotel, or (in my particular case) a funeral parlor.

Since the facilities are already in-place, is there really any design & dev to be done?

Of course the company could undertake (no pun intended) a facilites overhaul or even invest in new facilities, where the design/development activity would be intense. But since that wouldn't be an everday thing, could a funeral parlor exclude 7.3 in its entirety?

Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts!
Most of the things are already there in most of the organizations., manufacturing or service.
We are not into inventing or research when we talk about design and development.
It is a part of systamatic application of the product (service) realization.
For most part you have all your outputs inplace which are well and clear and you own them. These are just your design outputs which you have got by processing all inputs and reviewing / verifying and stuff. I am sure changes do keep happening and you process the change in the same way by getting into the change details and addressing them suitably such that your outputs again are effective to the faced changes.
I do not know much about funeral parlor, however I guess the major inputs here for your service design comes from tradition and customs followed by several nearby communities. May be someone asks for a perticular service based on some family tradition and you turn out something for them, typically doing a new design and development (or a change to your already established outputs, thereby having an other new output)
You then just go and deliver (or provide the service) to the customer.

I went ahead and saw THIS....
I see a good justification for keeping design and development
 
Last edited:

harry

Super Moderator
#3
............................. Since the facilities are already in-place, is there really any design & dev to be done?

Of course the company could undertake (no pun intended) a facilites overhaul or even invest in new facilities
, where the design/development activity would be intense. But since that wouldn't be an everday thing, could a funeral parlor exclude 7.3 in its entirety? .....................
You need a move out of the traditional 'engineering' mind when interpreting the design & development process that is applied to the service industry. When you get good service from a restaurant or hotel, it is not by chance but because some one purposely 'designed' the service to be so - how you were greeted, seated, how they help with the ordering process and menu and finally how the food was cooked and served. And it may include parking facilities, etc.

In theory, every service needs to be designed but many services are so common and if you are in a me-too type of business (just like another fish & chips outlet), there just isn't any need for design & development. What's important is continual improvement to meet changing needs of the market.

At the end of the day, it comes back to your organizations strategy and market needs. Does the market need a funeral parlor who can specially design a service or what's needed is just a choice among several standard packages?

Back to your question - it is up to your organizations strategy and for your organization to determine whether you want D&D. If you choose to have it, it will be stated in your certificate and you can market it that way.
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
Hi. By "faciliteis-based" I mean companies who sell the use of their facilities. Think of a hotel, or (in my particular case) a funeral parlor.

Since the facilities are already in-place, is there really any design & dev to be done?

Of course the company could undertake (no pun intended) a facilites overhaul or even invest in new facilities, where the design/development activity would be intense. But since that wouldn't be an everday thing, could a funeral parlor exclude 7.3 in its entirety?

Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts!
advega,

The facility may already be designed and built but the service of determining each customer's needs and tailoring delivery of your service to fulfill those needs should be designed.

Who buys the use of a building without expecting a service that fulfills their needs? Indeed, who buys any product without expecting a service that meets their expectations?

Each customer is briefed on their needs and expectations and those needs and expectations are translated into service specifications or, at least a shared understanding of what the service provider must do to meet requirements.

Particularly, design is required for delivery of each funeral service that fulfills the brief of the grieving family.

Is your funeral parlor truly delivered with no service?

John
 
A

advega

#5
@somashekar, @harry, @John Broomfield:
Thank you all for your inputs! I draw similar points from all of you, that the facilities alone do not make the "good service"; thank you for correcting me.

And I see how your points apply, when the funeral home I am helping customizes the service/s for many of the families who come in. So yes, design and development is definitely something that they do.

@jackbey:
The core reason this funeral home is seeking certification is because they have multiple locations and they would like to make the delivery of "excellent service" less of a hit-or-miss / guesswork thing across these locations :)
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#6
In theory, every service needs to be designed but many services are so common and if you are in a me-too type of business (just like another fish & chips outlet), there just isn't any need for design & development. What's important is continual improvement to meet changing needs of the market.
Sorry, totally disagree with that. I?ve seen numerous cases for "common" services which were not D&Ded, and then they did that, they found a lot of holes in their own services/requirements.

If you haven?t had a real analysis of what you do (in this case, as part of D&D) you are probably missing something.
 
A

advega

#8
Thanks very much for that "service blueprint" link, John. It looks like it could be helpful in my current project :)
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
O Outsourcing part of Design & Dev Process- Still requiring D&D ver & val-7.3.5, 7.3.6? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
W 7.3.7 Control of Design & Dev. Changes Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
B How to exclude empty rows in full factorial design analysis? Using Minitab Software 0
M Handling design changes with use-as-is inventory disposition Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
M Design Control - Management of Electronic CAD files Design and Development of Products and Processes 11
S Examples of FDA acceptable Software Design Specification (SDS) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
A Design Change/ECO Related Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
R Using R package to implement Bayesian phase I/II dose-finding design for three outcomes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C ISO 9001:2015 8.3.2. h) Design and Development Planning - What is required? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Z Software for design control ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
E Design and Development file Procedure ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
DuncanGibbons Section 8.3 relevant for design organisations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
P DFMEA - Machinery Design Best Practices FMEA and Control Plans 0
R Is a FAIR required on parts that we design? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
U API Spec Q1 - 5.6.1.2 C (3) - Design software Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 3
N Example for design and development planning,input,output,review,verification,validation and transfer Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
A 8.6 Release of products and services, 8.3 Design and development - evidence required ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
C Stress / Challenge Conditions for Design Verification Testing to Reduce Sample Size 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 11
J Significant change related to design and intended use EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Traceability of requirements to design and risk Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
U NOC - What is considered a "design change" EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Q PPT used as Design Review ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Design Verification Sample Size vs Repeats Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 9
A Design and development procedure for API Spec Q2 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
D Design controls - Inputs, outputs, V&V, DHF, DMR ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
LostLouie Manufacturer divorced from Design process, is he justified in design process deficiencies? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
R DFA & DFM - Examples for Design for assembly and design for manufacturability Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D ISO 13485 - 7.3.6 Design and development verification - Do most folks create a separate SOP? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K Joint approval between OEM and Manufacturer on Design Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
M API 4F/7K/8C Design Package Validation Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
A Design History File - Not ready to share the design drawings or Bill of Material US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
W Need for current design or process control FMEA and Control Plans 2
A What is the difference between Design Process, Process Design and Design Control? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
D Test summary report example for design validation wanted - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
S Documenting Design Verification Test Results (ISO 9001) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
DuncanGibbons Understanding the applicability of Design of Experiments to the IQ OQ PQ qualification approach Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
S Requirement to Conduct New Shelf-life Testing? (re-do testing for design change) EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A Sample Agreement available for Outsourcing Medical Device Design activity? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
DuncanGibbons How is the arrangement between Design and Production organisation envisaged? EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
L Design & Development of a SERVICE Service Industry Specific Topics 13
C Documentation for items used for Design Verification 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
P Design verification driven by new equipment. How is this different than process validation? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
A AS9102B - 3.6 Design Characteristics and form 3 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
P Design FMEA - Detection Rating criteria ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
U Medical Device Design finalization testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S MDR Delay - MDD design Change? (before new MDR DOA) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
J Iterative design and production for custom made products ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
T Design Input detail & specificity ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom