P
It is a fact that [term "consultant" not mentioned anywhere in ISO 9001].
It is also a fact that, "standard not saying that organization can appoint a Consultant as MR".
I feel Samsung is correct because "Consultant" cannot be a "member of the organization's management".
However it is true, many appointing Consultant as MR. I think the consideration here just like, company hiring workers on contractual basis (not a permanent employee of the company). Same way if MD do not have any problem by giving contract (appoint letter) to the Consultant, the Consultant will work for the organization. BUT HERE STILL SAMSUNG IS CORRECT BECAUSE CONSULTANT IS JUST CONSULTANT ONLY, CANNOT BE LIKE PERMANENT EMPLOYEE OF THE ORGANIZATION. It works as I mentioned "hiring workers".
Maheswari
It is also a fact that, "standard not saying that organization can appoint a Consultant as MR".
I feel Samsung is correct because "Consultant" cannot be a "member of the organization's management".
However it is true, many appointing Consultant as MR. I think the consideration here just like, company hiring workers on contractual basis (not a permanent employee of the company). Same way if MD do not have any problem by giving contract (appoint letter) to the Consultant, the Consultant will work for the organization. BUT HERE STILL SAMSUNG IS CORRECT BECAUSE CONSULTANT IS JUST CONSULTANT ONLY, CANNOT BE LIKE PERMANENT EMPLOYEE OF THE ORGANIZATION. It works as I mentioned "hiring workers".
Maheswari