Can/should SPC be applied to Computer Assembly and Software Imaging?

Tagin

Trusted Information Resource
#1
A customer is recommending use of SPC. But I am having a hard time determining if SPC can/should be used for our situation of producing specialized computers, which consists primarily of:
  • Manual mechanical assembly (i.e., w/screwdriver) of COTS components
  • Loading a pre-existing software image from a server
  • Running a series of diagnostic go/no-go functional Q/C tests on the computers

I don't see how we can apply SPC to this situation where there is no machining, soldering, etc. Further, it is a HMLV (high-mix low -volume) environment, where jobs are often for qtys of 20 or less per order.

Where needed, torque drivers are used, and those are calibrated on a regular basis. ESD items are also calibrated on a regular basis.

I just don't see what to measure for SPC that could be useful.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#2
The customer may be working from a default checklist obtained from a source that felt that SPC was appropriate for what they did.

Has your organization had any "quality escapes" with this customer that spurred them to make suggestions regarding your methods?
 

Tagin

Trusted Information Resource
#3
The SPC recommendation is a standard checklist item in their supplier relations; it was not driven by escapes.
 

DRAMMAN

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
Is any variable data collected or measured throughout the process? Maybe product measures?

Or you could use attribute charts to monitor defects found at process steps, testing, or audits.
 

chris1price

Trusted Information Resource
#5
I agree with the above, the requirement may have come from a checklist and mignt not be applicable. However, SPC can be observed from attribute data. If you have go-no-go or pass/fail results, these can be used to determine the control of the processes.
 

Tagin

Trusted Information Resource
#6
Yes, I was thinking that the only way I could do SPC was via attribute data. The data is essentially all binary (pass/fail), and since the job sizes are so small, there won't be much "statistics" in the SPC.

Ok, thanks folks - this was helpful!
 

DRAMMAN

Quite Involved in Discussions
#7
It depends on how you bucketize the information. I have used attribute SPC in electronics manufacturing in your exact situation for many years. You can track the defects by order. But it may be more useful to look at the performance in larger buckets such as weekly or monthly to monitor the production process as a whole. The main benefit is knowing when to focus on the process as opposed to reacting to a specific defect as if it were a crisis. The benefits from attribute SPC are the same as with variable data SPC. It helps you identify when your process is out of control.
 

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#8
Yes, I was thinking that the only way I could do SPC was via attribute data. The data is essentially all binary (pass/fail), and since the job sizes are so small, there won't be much "statistics" in the SPC.
You have a good point. The whole point of Shewhart charts is to find a trend that indicates you have a special cause arise after you have eliminated all of the special causes! In attribute data, a trend may be a spike in rejections for that test. If you see a trend you can act on it. But, you won't see much action within small jobs. Maybe longer term shifts between lots.

But, yes, people love the SPC rubber stamp. It's not the only rubber stamp they like!
 

DRAMMAN

Quite Involved in Discussions
#9
Also keep in mind, if you use a stats package such as minitab it will automatically factor in the varying lot sizes when determine the control limits.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Should Purchased Software for both SPC and Gage R&R be documented in the QMS? Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 2
T Monthly SPC original data sheets - What should be done with the reports? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
Rameshwar25 Which tool should be used first - MSA or SPC Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 30
J When should we use SPC? Manufacturing Frame and Pressed Part Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
W Should we monitor all Significant part Characteristics with SPC? Low Volume CNC Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 15
A When or how often should we update SPC (UCL and LCL) Control Limits? Every month? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7
D Which SPC Chart should I use? XbarR, Range, XmR, p, np, c, u, Zero Mean? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
M Can/should SPC be used in administrative areas, purchasing, sales, planning... Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Use of "Shall" versus "Should" in Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 21
D Class II medical device - When should a complaint be closed? Customer Complaints 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ed Panek Part 11 Self Certify Memo - What else should it cover? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
H Should I mention machine/Equipment password In SOP? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
D How long should we keep the spare parts available for our medical device, after we have stopped the production? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
H Statistical Techniques Procedure - What should be included Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Q How should I analyze measurement correlation between me and customer? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001:2024 - What should be changed in the next Edition of ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 82
N Should it even be on the hazard analysis (software)? FMEA and Control Plans 2
V Which batches should or could be considered for design validation and design verification? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
L A Taiwan company want to sell Class I medical device (510(k) exempt) on Amazon, should we register with FDA? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
M Routine testing of medical electrical systems - What specific electrical safety tests should be performed? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
G ISO 17025:2017 7.1.2 - Should I produce a document for the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
F Quality Objectives - Where in the QMS Quality Objectives should be located ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
P ISO 80369-7 standard - Interpreting which Parts should be in scope Other Medical Device Related Standards 7
V Who should define and own the Design and Development Plan and how to maintain the updates and revisions. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A How should the Medical Device OEMs be declared to ANVISA? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom