Can we do audit in "VERY CONFIDENTIAL DEPARTMENTS"?

A

AdamEve

#1
Ladies and Gentlemen,

Good day.

Let me introduce you to our two departments within the organization;

1) Quality Assurance Department (QA) implementing the QMS under ISO 9001:2008 and has an Internal Quality Auditors doing the Internal Quality Audits.


2) Internal Audit Department (IA) in which they are performing the "audits" of almost the same scope as of the QA Dept.
  • They are auditing ALL the departments including the conformance of the departments based on their "departmental procedures" and other subject based on their IIA requirements.
  • Their audit is governed by Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) and the manager of the department claims that their department is mandated by the Board of Directors of the organization.
  • The IA Dept claims that they are reporting directly to the "highest" authority in the organization which is the Board of Directors and only reporting "administratively" to the CEO.
  • They claim that they have "CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS/RECORDS" which should not be revealed to any employee (including the IQA Auditors). That is why they should NOT BE AUDITED by IQA Auditors.
Based on the facts about this department, they claim that they are NOT TO BE AUDITED by the IQA Auditors (QMS based on ISO 9001:2008) since it will be a "scrutinizing" auditing. They claim that the IQA Auditors may just "fight back" against them instead of properly auditing. (Note: IA is performing audits to the QA departments including the IQA auditors).



MY QUESTION:
  1. DOES THE ISO 9001:2008 HAS THE "RIGHT" TO CONDUCT AUDIT TO THIS DEPARTMENT?
Similarly;
  1. DOES THE ISO 9001:2008 SHOULD PERFORM THE AUDIT TO "ALL" DEPARTMENTS INCLUDING THE "LEGAL DEPARTMENT", FINANCE DEPARTMENT", and even those departments which they claim that they have "VERY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS/RECORDS/PROCESSES"?
Thank you and hope to hear your comments, suggestions, remarks, etc.

Regards.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

insect warfare

QA=Question Authority
Trusted Information Resource
#2
Sounds like overkill and unnecessary competition at work here. Why are there two audit systems in place with different objectives when surely there seem to be more than enough auditing resources to establish a unified audit program with unified objectives?

Brian :rolleyes:
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
Adam,

No audit should be a fishing expedition. Every auditor should know what they want to see and why they want to see it and they should be able to explain this to the auditee.

Auditors avoid going places or examining evidence they do not need to see to fulfill the audit objective. They make this clear to the auditee.

Having agreed the audit objective with the auditee you will determine the security clearance requirements.

You then can bring someone onto the audit team who has the necessary clearances or engage the auditee in describing/confirming the required evidence.

If you are unable to fulfill the audit objective, as lead auditor you are obliged to inform the auditee.

Usually, depending on the auditor's manner, the auditee is willing to help out.

Forgive me for saying this, but it appears to me that you need to stop insisting on "your rights" as an auditor.

John
 

normzone

Trusted Information Resource
#4
It would be interesting to know the history of the two audit groups. Merely speculating, but how old is the organization, and which one came first?

I'll guess that the audit group answering to the board of directors was developed to reassure them regarding the functions of the company, and the QA audit group was developed as part of becoming certified to an ISO standard.

If I was the QA audit group, I'd be tempted to ignore the board's auditors. You may add additional scoffing or scorn to your ignoring if it makes you feel better. They're outside the scope of my interest and requirements.

Legal and finance are largely outside as well, unless you have a clear requirement from the standard or your internal process documentation that drags you into those arenas.
 
#5
1) Quality Assurance Department (QA) implementing the QMS under ISO 9001:2008 and has an Internal Quality Auditors doing the Internal Quality Audits.


2) Internal Audit Department (IA) in which they are performing the "audits" of almost the same scope as of the QA Dept.
They are auditing ALL the departments including the conformance of the departments based on their "departmental procedures" and other subject based on their IIA requirements.
Their audit is governed by Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) and the manager of the department claims that their department is mandated by the Board of Directors of the organization.
The IA Dept claims that they are reporting directly to the "highest" authority in the organization which is the Board of Directors and only reporting "administratively" to the CEO.
They claim that they have "CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS/RECORDS" which should not be revealed to any employee (including the IQA Auditors). That is why they should NOT BE AUDITED by IQA Auditors.


Why was the QA group given responsibility for internal QMS audits when there's a group doing them already? (or vice versa)
 
A

AdamEve

#6
Adam,

No audit should be a fishing expedition. Every auditor should know what they want to see and why they want to see it and they should be able to explain this to the auditee.

Auditors avoid going places or examining evidence they do not need to see to fulfill the audit objective. They make this clear to the auditee.

Having agreed the audit objective with the auditee you will determine the security clearance requirements.

You then can bring someone onto the audit team who has the necessary clearances or engage the auditee in describing/confirming the required evidence.

If you are unable to fulfill the audit objective, as lead auditor you are obliged to inform the auditee.

Usually, depending on the auditor's manner, the auditee is willing to help out.

Forgive me for saying this, but it appears to me that you need to stop insisting on "your rights" as an auditor.

John
Thanks.

I may have used the wrong word "rights".

However, your input is well appreciated.

Thanks again.
 
S

Sarah Stec

#7
In my experience, the "Internal Audit Department" and the QA department have different roles and purposes within the organization, sort of like the difference between the Quality and Legal departments. The way I understand it, the Internal Audit Department is there to ensure the company complies with all the different corporate regulations that the company has to comply with, whereas QA is there to ensure the company complies with all the different procedures the company creates for its QMS. IA doesn't specifically audit the QMS as the QMS, but rather the company's procedures with respect to its practices with respect to the laws and regulations with which it complies. In other words, it's not Quality's job to link a missing calibration record with a series of payments for $9,998 to a bank account in an opaque bank account - it's IA's job.

So to answer your questions, I don't think this department is within the scope of ISO 9001, and neither would legal or finance unless they're brought in through another function.
 
#9
<In my experience, the "Internal Audit Department" and the QA department have different roles and purposes within the organization, sort of like the difference between the Quality and Legal departments. The way I understand it, the Internal Audit Department is there to ensure the company complies with all the different corporate regulations that the company has to comply with, whereas QA is there to ensure the company complies with all the different procedures the company creates for its QMS.>

This may be the case in larger companies, but in smaller ones these issues tend to overlap. My 'QA' department oversees compliance with Dodd-Frank, contract review, building codes, 'Buy-American', and a host of other 'legal' and 'HR' issues as well.
However, IA does not audit these functions, maybe that is an oversight, but it has worked so far. Third party auditors have never asked to see anything related to these issues either.
 
T

Taliesyn

#10
A quick internet search for the "Institute of Internal Auditors" reveals that they are concerned with risk management, corporate governance, etc. Strictly speaking these are outside the current scope of ISO9001... until the 2015 version arrives! That could be quite an interesting bun fight if you were a bystander!!
For the moment, my judgement is that the IQA people are correct.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Inputs on definition of very similar processes for multi site audit sample - IAF MD1 2018 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
J ISO/TS 16949 Pre-assessment Audit last week and it went very well! General Auditing Discussions 7
D A VERY Small Company - Internal Audit Internal Auditing 62
N API Q1 Audit Surveillance - Questions Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
A Alternative to on site audit in China EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J Help to understand and response to API AAR during the re-certification audit Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 17
B Internal audit checklist Internal Auditing 5
V Internal Audit Software IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
J Internal Audit Schedule IATF Internal Auditing 3
Mikey324 External calibration - Finding in our 3rd party audit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 58
C ISO 14001 Internal Audit - Opportunity for Improvement ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
P Does FDA require certification for quality system internal audit for auditor? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
J Stage 2 audit initial cert, few data points ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Corrections not allowed during audit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
P Looking to outsource Internal Audit - MDSAP competent auditor needed Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 9
R GFE Audit - Violation? GFE Location Controls AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
D Help Me. Non conformitty in External Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
M How to answer ISO9001:2015 audit finding of old revisions of documents being used? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
B UKRP to what level should you audit Class I Technical Documentation? UK Medical Device Regulations 0
I Audit is tomorrow but I refused to participate Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 16
I ISO 17025:2017 / ANAB 3125 - Articulating / Communicating Risks vis-a-vis Audit Findings ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
D Verify Audit Trail of SaaS system Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
D Re-labeler - audit the supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J Outsourced Internal Audit requirements for Aerospace Suppliers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 21
A PPAP question for audit APQP and PPAP 16
D Number of people to be interviewed during an internal audit? Internal Auditing 10
B Gamma Quarterly Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
A Anxiety - ISO Re-registration Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 69
Ed Panek Auditor MDR (Presub audit) finding EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Q Easy CARs for Internal Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Quarterly Dose Audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
H When is a SOC 2 audit necessary? IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 5
J NCR- Failure of contract review process - NADCAP audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
D Special IATF audit of sub-supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
A Internal audit plan and processes for ISO 14001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
C API Q1 internal audit report Internal Auditing 3
P Filled in F48/F49 for internal audit ISO 17025:2017 Internal Auditing 2
A IRIS audit - Discussion about Special Processes General Auditing Discussions 11
J Internal audit random sampling methodology Internal Auditing 2
D Major NC from last audit not fixed not sure how to fix General Auditing Discussions 10
X Sample SOC2 audit report (or a redacted one) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
D Lead time to schedule an ISO 13485 audit General Auditing Discussions 2
G Organizing internal audit program for an Integrated QHSE Management System Internal Auditing 13
S Does anyone have a checklist to prepare for ISO 13485, Stage I audit? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
W How do you phrase your internal audit questions? Internal Auditing 3
Z Steps to take before an MDSAP audit for Canada Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
V Csv, excel format - audit trail file of HPLC system ( Empower, openlab, EZchrom or any other ) Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
G Not accepting a non conformity during an audit General Auditing Discussions 11

Similar threads

Top Bottom