Q
Quarma
My client has a Software (SW) product. No hardware, just standalone SW.
No DVD, no CD, just a filename and it is downloaded to the customer site.
The essential requirements 13.3 require for the label:
The label must bear the following particulars:
- (l) year of manufacture for active devices other than those covered by
(e [= has use by date]). This indication may be included in the batch or serial number;
The technical file reviewer (BSI Germany) says:
-SW is manufactured (the process from getting it from the manufacturer to the user= hospital)
- it needs to be labelled. [filename is label]
- the label needs to fulfill the requirements above.
Thus my SW filename needs to contain a year of manufacture.
The filename [- Year of manufacture ] changes every year, even though my SW does not change. This makes no sense to me.
My thinking is, that SW is uniquely identified by revision number. I control the content, so make sure that every bit is the same, when transfered. The year of manufacture is not relevant for SW, it is not a property of the SW. The reviewer insists there is production for SW.
Questions:
1) Has anybody encountered this interpretation of the Essential requirements ? -(year of manufacture required for standalone SW)
2) Does that make sense to anybody ?
3) Does anybody have a year of manufacture in their SW-filename or on CD?
4) Is the concept of "production" for standalone SW common ?
thank you for your sharing your experiences.
No DVD, no CD, just a filename and it is downloaded to the customer site.
The essential requirements 13.3 require for the label:
The label must bear the following particulars:
- (l) year of manufacture for active devices other than those covered by
(e [= has use by date]). This indication may be included in the batch or serial number;
The technical file reviewer (BSI Germany) says:
-SW is manufactured (the process from getting it from the manufacturer to the user= hospital)
- it needs to be labelled. [filename is label]
- the label needs to fulfill the requirements above.
Thus my SW filename needs to contain a year of manufacture.
The filename [- Year of manufacture ] changes every year, even though my SW does not change. This makes no sense to me.
My thinking is, that SW is uniquely identified by revision number. I control the content, so make sure that every bit is the same, when transfered. The year of manufacture is not relevant for SW, it is not a property of the SW. The reviewer insists there is production for SW.
Questions:
1) Has anybody encountered this interpretation of the Essential requirements ? -(year of manufacture required for standalone SW)
2) Does that make sense to anybody ?
3) Does anybody have a year of manufacture in their SW-filename or on CD?
4) Is the concept of "production" for standalone SW common ?
thank you for your sharing your experiences.