The objectives come from the policy...(per ISO 9001) Your policy sets a frame work for setting objectives. You may need to rethink this as there's little room for improvement with a policy which sets out your aim as the stars!
I'd still put it to you that, if your policy is to "exceed expectations"...what will you use to objectively determine that you have done this? Expectations are, by their very nature, often unstated. When you go to McDonalds, you never say "I'd like Hot, Safe, fries"...but that's what you expect...
I'd still put it to you that, if your policy is to "exceed expectations"...what will you use to objectively determine that you have done this? Expectations are, by their very nature, often unstated. When you go to McDonalds, you never say "I'd like Hot, Safe, fries"...but that's what you expect...
Since anything and everything one puts into their quality policy becomes auditable, it can just as easily be picked apart by an auditor like you described. As it seems, this handy document (which I refer to more and more these days) has two accepted definitions of "expectation", which are:
- (noun) belief about (or mental picture of) the future
- (noun) wishing with confidence of fulfillment
I personally do not like to paint myself into a corner with verbiage such as "meet or exceed expectations" or the like, when the standard only calls for inclusion of "a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve QMS effectiveness".
Going further into the word "expectation" - it is extremely difficult to be aware of what one expects, unless it is explicitly stated. In the realm of customer satisfaction, this can muddy the waters as one could falsely state that customer expectations were exceeded when, unbeknownst to them, the customer may not have even been aware of the expectation, or had an alternate (tacit) expectation. On the flipside, an auditor must also possess an intuition as to when some things cannot be audited objectively (like implied expectations), and record them for reference.
Brian