Choosing a Registrar - What Should We Look For in a Registrar?



Re: my purist viewpoint

Originally posted by Lucinda
Buying a cheap and easy registration is like eating bar-b-que with no beer. *shutter*

Do you think for one moment that the Customer cares who your Registrar is? Not! That only matters to the "Purists":truce:

Buying an expensive and difficult registration is eating bar-b-cue brushed with Dom Perignon! It's a big waste and won't taste any different, except to those who imagine it does.:bigwave: :smokin:

Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Lucinda, Ask yourself this question; Is the registration for me or is it for the company?
You can demand perfection, you can demand that everything be black & White, you can demand strict compliance with requirements with stern consequences, but there is one thing you can not do, and that is achieve certification by "force feeding" through a hard line audit process. The registrar and the auditor have virtually no bearing on whether or not you attain certification. All they do is check the homework and grade the papers.
Now, if your really set on getting a hard line auditor I suggest you call the registrar of your choice and ask for the "auditor from hell". Every registrar has at least one.

Aaron Lupo

Re: my purist viewpoint

Originally posted by Lucinda

Registration is expensive. If all a company wants is a piece of paper to hand to clients and doesn't care about anything else, then a cheap registrar who only carries RAB accreditation is good enough.
Registration does not have to be expensive. That is a sad view point that you consider a Registrar that has only RAB certification as no good. So correct me if I am wrong, but a Registrar that only has RAB accreditation in your view point can not have good auditors, and the more accreditations a Registrar has the better their auditors? Do you realize that for every Accreditation your Registrar has they pass the cost on to you.
Your companies reputation isn't going to be enhanced any more than any other company. I have never heard anyone request an ISO cert. from their vendor and then say "this is good, but now we want you to change registrars to a more affluent one"
Just a thought. Maybe there is information out there that can hlp us. Quality magazine runs an annual survey of registrars. If a registrar is listed way down, maybe I would choose to audit a supplier who uses them.

Also, if we name names on this board maybe some of the registrars lose business and go out of business.

If a supplier uses a poor or disreputable registrar, and customers choose to audit anyway because they know that the registrar cannot be trusted, then the supplier is not saving any money.
If we let them know that this is the reason they are being audited, perhaps they will choose to change registrars, or the registrar will clean up its act.

Last edited by a moderator:


Still plugging along
feels like gang rape

Go ahead, beat me up. But yes, I will choose to run with the big dogs when the time comes. We have international operations, need an international registrar, and one whose name carries weight with our clients. And I will ask for the assessor from hell.

This company hasn't learned the meaning of quality. There are no warm fuzzies here. This is something we are doing because the cost of NOT doing it is too much. It will take a big stick to make changes. It will take someone stronger than Mr. Rogers to impress on these people that they need to be doing all these things that they think they can get away from doing. I don't want someone who will say "well, you meet the minimum req's of the standard so there is no reason to do anything more than what you are doing."

And as I've stated before, I have no faith in the RAB accreditation (any more than I have faith in some registrars). Been there, done that, and they are a joke. Not that a company might have good assessors - but who can tell? Only RAB has looked at their system. A registrar is about more than the assessor. I want UKAS accreditation. For my registrar to carry, and for my cert to carry.

I used to track the costs of each registrar (not the little ones, but the ones with a credible client base) and there was not so much difference. The difference is in market perception. And you are fooling yourself if you think that other people don't know the rep or non-rep of your registrar. I heard more times than I can count that a company chose XX to be their registrar because it is recognized in their industry. Or that they chose them because the company they supply to uses them. Obviously these people thought it made a difference. I know of many companies who came to my former employer from a no-name to get better service and to "move up the ladder".

And speaking of cost and reputation, etc., what kind of car do you drive? What kind of dishwasher do you have? What kind of camera do you use? It's called "fitness for purpose". Quality. Exactly what I've been saying here. It just depends on what you are needing from registration.

A registrar who only carries RAB accreditation may have good assessors, but who can tell? Only RAB has looked at their system. (and I've stated before that RAB is a joke. ) There is more to a registrar than the assessors. I want UKAS accreditation for my registrar, and for my cert. Not perfect, but heads above RAB.

I refuse to believe that I will get something cheaper from a company because they "saved" money on their registration. This is a pass-down cost? Filtered through how many widgets? Wow. I guess that would amount to a 1 cent savings to me for buying 100 widgets. Thanks, but I would rather have a credible certification so that I didn't have to audit them myself so much.

Whatever.:agree: We will all do what makes sense to us.

And energy, I would never drink a sparkling wine with bar-b-que! I save that for my Belgian chocolates.:vfunny:


Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
One Size Does NOT Fit All

The bottom line to me is that each company has different needs. I have had clients that wanted big registrars and some who didn't care. A Navy facility I did some work with wanted UL. Their reasoning - unimpeachability (If UL says OK, it must be because everyone trusts UL and UL is percieved by most people to be totally 'independent').

Most any more are smaller companies and their concern is limited to price (which means a small local registrar when available).

On the no paper end - hey - if you don't need or want the paper, but you want to be able to connect your company to the ISO 9001 bandwagon in some way, that's fine.

One of the things I really love about these forums is that the more I read the better I understand how each company is an individual with individual needs. And even after all the messages in all three sets of forums software I have used, my learning never stops.

Lucinda - Welcome to the Cove Forums! The Land of Opinions! Sometimes very strong opinions. Some of my posts approximate a Southern Baptist Sermon... You've brought up some excellent points in this thread and I hope you don't really feel too 'beat up on' (the title of your last post threw me a bit - I can see the headlines now: "Woman Accosted In Cove Forums! Extra! Extra! Read all about it!") :bonk:

I'd say more - but there's nothing I can add that hasn't been addressed. Excellent discussion thread! :thedeal:


Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Originally posted by JRKH

Also, if we name names on this board maybe some of the registrars lose business and go out of business.
Use names all you want. I like to see names. As long as facts / experiences are cited along with the opinion.

If a registrar goes out of business because they're deep sixed in a thread or two in these forums, I'll eat my hat - or a hat made of candy. Heck - Perry Johnson would be out of business if these forums held any significant sway - someone's always knocking Perry's company here.

If one really did go out of business because of things said here, they probably really deserved to go out of business. Of course, they'll probably sue me because I run the forums and they'll claim some type of conspiracy. :thedeal:


Super Moderator
Is UKAS listed on the NYSE or something?:confused:

Lucinda sounds like someone trying to sell a used Yugo in Detroit.:eek:

IMHO the only registrations worth a crap are done by Registrars certified in Iran, Iraq, or Yemen. Nobody is going to influence or buy them off. No sir eee.:biglaugh:

How about Mexican Registrars? Or the Danes, Germans, Canadians, Japanese. How about a Swiss Registrar, Italian, So. African, or any other nationality? I guess they are all crappy too.


I remember something about the Greek word "isos" which means equal. The same here as there.

Welcome to the Cove Forum Lucinda sweety.:bigwave:
Last edited:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
E Choosing an ISO 9001 registrar with auditors familiar with our industry Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
L Choosing a Registrar - Need registrar selection advice Registrars and Notified Bodies 6
A Choosing a Registrar - Registrar Selection II Registrars and Notified Bodies 5
J Choosing a Registrar - Registrars That "Do It All" Registrars and Notified Bodies 90
D Choosing the same registrar For QS registration Registrars and Notified Bodies 1
B Rating and Choosing a Registrar Registrars and Notified Bodies 31
Marc Choosing a Registrar - Registrar Recommendations Registrars and Notified Bodies 236
Q Old products new class - Dental Devices - Choosing tests EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Choosing Auditors - ISO 9001 / ISO 27001 (UK) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 2
T AS9100D - Scope of QMS for New Company - Only Choosing a Function Subset Due to Management AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 14
M Dilemma about choosing the most applicable clause related to Risk ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
J Choosing QMS Software for Aerospace Company Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 5
B Choosing not to calibrate (IATF 16949) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Q Choosing between ISO 9001 (2015) & TL 9000 certifications ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
H On choosing touchscreen displays and ensuring IEC 60601 compliance IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
Q Choosing In-Process Inspection Characteristics Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
L Choosing the correct Distribution for Acceptance Sampling Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 19
S Choosing a suitable type of Elisa to Test my Sample Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
S Choosing the correct Elisa Test Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 1
K Choosing a Six Sigma training organization Six Sigma 4
H Choosing between RABQSA Lead Auditor or ASQ CQA Certification Professional Certifications and Degrees 2
S Choosing ISO 9001 Training and if I need the training for work ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
S CE Marking choosing between module A, B CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
A Getting Stuck Choosing a Sampling Plan Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
M Choosing the right Industry Financial Report Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
M Advice for choosing Rechargeable Lithium Batteries to be used in a Medical Device Other Medical Device Related Standards 16
L Choosing a Statistical Test for dissertation results! Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
I Choosing a X-Ray Fluorescence Measuring Device for Chrome Coating Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
J Choosing the Best Standard - ISO 9001 or ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 14
B Choosing Inspection Level and AQL AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 1
I Choosing the alpha level in an ANOVA Study Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
M Tolerance vs. Study Variation - Choosing the right one Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
S Choosing a Higher EER Air Conditioner After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 7
T Choosing a Mentor Career and Occupation Discussions 3
K Selection Criteria for choosing a Management Representative for QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
A Choosing Document Control Software Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 13
S Choosing Parts for Attribute MSA (Measurement System Analysis) in 4th Edition, pg 132 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
C Difference between softwares in choosing correct Taguchi designs Using Minitab Software 16
bio_subbu Choosing a laboratory for biocompatibility test ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
M Choosing a Laser Micrometer - Your recommendations? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
Marc Forum User Name - Choosing a forum User Name (aka 'handle' or 'screen name') Elsmar Cove Forum ToS and Forum Policies 0
G Short TQM training - Choosing of most important points Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
B Choosing number of subgroups and subgroup size Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
D Choosing a Vision System - Recommendations for a User Friendlier System Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 3
D Need Help on choosing dimensional standards / equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J Choosing Samples for Gage R&R - Randomly picked samples show very little variation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 13
Tim Folkerts DOE: Choosing a Design - Factors that affect the choice of design The Reading Room 0
B ISO10012:2003 Question - Choosing or assessing the capability of a piece of equipment Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
G Choosing a Sampling plan for Start Up Fabless IC Company - Guarantee a 200 DPM limit Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 9
gard2372 Choosing between a Small Company or a Large Company Career and Occupation Discussions 17
Similar threads

Top Bottom