For those that have access to the ASQ discussion board, there was a discussion on this topic.
http://www.asq.org/discussionBoards/thread.jspa?forumID=5&threadID=2579&messageID=56000#56000
As I stated in the ASQ discussion, I wished our church had a quality program.
I will not address the "higher order" benefits of a good quality program, but stay on the administrative side.
Let me give an example.
(True Story) Sunday evening we had a fire alarm. A small child had pulled the lever. Fire responded, etc. No one hurt; no harm, no foul. Read the below as questions from me, and answers from “someone in the know”.
1. Why was the child able to pull the alarm?
2. Was everyone evacuated? Most everybody. Why not all?
3. Who do you call when something like this happens? The Emergency Response Team. OK, who’s on that group? Well, the committee knows. Who’s the committee?
4. What about kids in classes? Do I go get them? NO! The teachers evacuate them. That’s funny; I’m a teacher, and am completely clueless on the process.
I could continue this one discussion for a long time. My point, churches are organizations. As the sizes of denominations are increasing (the large church issue) they are dealing with large organization matters.
1. Churches need documentation on how they deal with matters.
2. Churches need a Mission Statement. This gives vision and direction to individuals working very hard, usually for no income.
3. Like the example above, some simple procedures with training records could at least increase the assurance that people know how to deal with fire drills.
While it is up to the church leadership whether it is in their best interest to pay for certification, improving the process is worth the effort. Churches are about people who are very passionate about the cause, and a good quality system will only enhance their efforts.
http://www.asq.org/discussionBoards/thread.jspa?forumID=5&threadID=2579&messageID=56000#56000
As I stated in the ASQ discussion, I wished our church had a quality program.
I will not address the "higher order" benefits of a good quality program, but stay on the administrative side.
Let me give an example.
(True Story) Sunday evening we had a fire alarm. A small child had pulled the lever. Fire responded, etc. No one hurt; no harm, no foul. Read the below as questions from me, and answers from “someone in the know”.
1. Why was the child able to pull the alarm?
2. Was everyone evacuated? Most everybody. Why not all?
3. Who do you call when something like this happens? The Emergency Response Team. OK, who’s on that group? Well, the committee knows. Who’s the committee?
4. What about kids in classes? Do I go get them? NO! The teachers evacuate them. That’s funny; I’m a teacher, and am completely clueless on the process.
I could continue this one discussion for a long time. My point, churches are organizations. As the sizes of denominations are increasing (the large church issue) they are dealing with large organization matters.
1. Churches need documentation on how they deal with matters.
2. Churches need a Mission Statement. This gives vision and direction to individuals working very hard, usually for no income.
3. Like the example above, some simple procedures with training records could at least increase the assurance that people know how to deal with fire drills.
While it is up to the church leadership whether it is in their best interest to pay for certification, improving the process is worth the effort. Churches are about people who are very passionate about the cause, and a good quality system will only enhance their efforts.
