SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

Class I Reusable Surgical Instruments - CE Mark with the Notified Body number

Chrisx

Involved In Discussions
#1
The latest draft of the MDR has the aspects of reuse of reusable surgical instruments subject to conformity assessment by the notified bodies. I think this means that the devices would have to bear the CE with the notified body number. Do we think this will apply to product already placed on the market? If not, I have a lot of laser marking to do, ugh. For sure it will be a discussion point with our notified body, but its too early for them to have reached a decision.

ChrisX
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#2
The latest draft of the MDR has the aspects of reuse of reusable surgical instruments subject to conformity assessment by the notified bodies. I think this means that the devices would have to bear the CE with the notified body number. Do we think this will apply to product already placed on the market? If not, I have a lot of laser marking to do, ugh. For sure it will be a discussion point with our notified body, but its too early for them to have reached a decision.

ChrisX
Considering the general EU approach to grandfathering, I think that after any applicable transition periods, everything in the MDR will apply to product models already on the market, unless a specific exemption is spelled out.

If you were referring to device units already on the market, I think that they will continue to be able to be used without a change, however for being resold (= "made available on the market") they will have to be compliant.
 

Chrisx

Involved In Discussions
#3
Yes, I think this will be the interpretation as well. For the orthopedic industry, remarking all reusable instruments with the notified body number is a big task. I think many won't do it willingly.
 

RobertvanBoxtel

Involved In Discussions
#4
I do not see that following Annex VIII for reusables will result in a CE mark with NB number. Can you show your reasoning?

And: the CE mark is only a small issue, because:

Annex V:
4.10 Devices that are reusable shall bear a UDI Carrier on the device itself. The UDI Carrier of reusable devices that require cleaning, disinfection, sterilisation or refurbishing between patient uses shall be permanent and readable after each process performed to make the device ready for the next use for the intended lifetime of the device. The requirement of this
section shall not apply to any device that meets any of the following criteria:
(a) Any type of direct marking would interfere with the safety or performance of the device;
(b) The device cannot be directly marked because it is not technologically feasible.

This might be more challenging....
 

Chrisx

Involved In Discussions
#5
I'm not sure if the new MDR requires the number. Article 18 states:

"Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 42. "

I think under the current MDD 93/42/EEC, class I sterile and class I measuring required the notified body number, but I might be wrong.

You are correct that the direct marking of the UDI poses another issue. I'm hoping they will not require it for consigned inventory, just like FDA has indicated in a newsletter to AdvaMed.
 

pkost

Trusted Information Resource
#6
I'm not sure if the new MDR requires the number. Article 18 states:

"Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 42. "

I think under the current MDD 93/42/EEC, class I sterile and class I measuring required the notified body number, but I might be wrong.

You are correct that the direct marking of the UDI poses another issue. I'm hoping they will not require it for consigned inventory, just like FDA has indicated in a newsletter to AdvaMed.
It is article 42(5) (Conformity assessment procedures) that requires this and has appeared as a result of th trilogue discussions:

Manufacturers of devices classified as class I, other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall declare the conformity of their products by issuing the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 17 after drawing up the technical documentation set out in Annex II. If the devices are placed on the market in sterile condition, are reusable surgical instruments or have a measuring function, the manufacturer shall apply the procedures set out in Annex VIII, Chapter I (Quality Management System) and Chapter III (Administrative provisions), or in Part A of Annex X. However, the involvement of the notified body shall be limited:
(a) in the case of devices placed on the market in sterile condition, to the aspects concerned with establishing, securing and maintaining sterile conditions,
(b) in the case of devices with a measuring function, to the aspects concerned with the conformity of the devices with the metrological requirements;
(c) in the case of reusable surgical instruments, to the aspects related to the reuse of the device, in particular cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, maintenance and functional testing and the related instructions for use.
 

RobertvanBoxtel

Involved In Discussions
#7
Yes, I follow your line of thought and saw that in Article 42. But, it does not say that for the reusable situation (c), the NB number shall be added to the CE mark. Maybe the final text will be more conclusive on that.
 

nozzle

Involved In Discussions
#8
Hi,
If I'm reading the final text of the MDR correctly then reusable class 1 surgical instruments will have the cleaning, disinfection etc.. processes come under the scrutiny of the notified body and will need to apply the notified body number, in accordance with Article 52, 7c.

Have I understood this correctly?
TIA
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#9
Hi,
If I'm reading the final text of the MDR correctly then reusable class 1 surgical instruments will have the cleaning, disinfection etc.. processes come under the scrutiny of the notified body and will need to apply the notified body number, in accordance with Article 52, 7c.

Have I understood this correctly?
TIA
Yes. Anytime a NB is involved in the conformity assessment procedure (classes IIa, IIb, III and the sterilization/measurement/reusable surgical instruments of class I), their number needs to be part of the label.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J Reusable surgical Instrument is under class IIa? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Z MDR Class Ir deadline (Reusable surgical instruments) EU Medical Device Regulations 27
S How is the service life for class I reusable medical devices described in MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 7
S How is the service life described for class I reusable medical devices in MDR? Elsmar Xenforo Forum Software Instructions and Help 1
MDD_QNA Production vs Repair of Reusable Medical Devices (Class IIa) EU Medical Device Regulations 6
M Component Lot Number Traceability - Class I reusable and "resposable" Medical Devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
S Class I Device - Reusable Instruments labeling requirements Imported Legacy Blogs 2
M Labeling Requirements for Reusable Class II Medical Device in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 4
L Sterilization validation for reusable medical device class II Other Medical Device Related Standards 9
L "Shelf-Life" Class I Non-Sterile Products Expiration Date? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
S Stability sampling for Class 1 medical devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
T Including a class 1 camera in the 510k application of class 2 therapeutic technology? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 18
S Class I Equipment with mobile power inverter IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
shimonv Can you submit a traditional application for a class I device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
D Faxback form versus amendment License for Class II Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
K Ground Bond Test for Class I Medical Electrical Equipment - calibration problems IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
J The necessity and benefit of ISO13485:2016 for a manufacturer of class I devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
L Class II (Double Insulated) Power Supply with Output Tied to Earth: FE or PE? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
S IPC-A-610 Class 3 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
S Class 1 and 2 changes in CM standards (aerospace industry) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 0
S Class 1 vs Class 2 changes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 0
Fjalar Spare parts for discontinued MDD compliant class I medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Y MDR requirements for Class I accessories EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J EU Declaration of Conformity for Class I EU Medical Device Regulations 3
H Class II a vs "software safety class A" IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 3
K Classification Rationale for class 1 EU Medical Device Regulations 3
I Class VI certification on seals, o-ring and plastic for a WFI system Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
N Class I accessories covered by EC certificate EU Medical Device Regulations 0
L Change Notification Requirements for class 1 devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Issues with leakage current testing for a CLASS II device since no PE and FE is present IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
J Med Device Class for a Service Organization ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
shimonv Clinical evaluation report for class I device EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D Control Number for Class III and IV devices Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
M Class II type machine , and its compliance with 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 14
K Technical file for MHRA - looking for assistance with self declaration Class I device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
A Clinical assessment sample size - Medical device Class IIb implantable (93/42 directive) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
J Should a Class 1 medical device with an option to measure body weight be considered Class 1m? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
P ISO 14644 Class 8 Cleanroom Air Filter Requirements Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
J Instructions for use for Class I devices under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
D Electrical Medical Devices class I EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K MDR Class 1 Self Certification - Competent Authority or Notified Body? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
K Interesting Discussion "World Class Product" based QM. I need advice. Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 14
L Class IIb devices marked EC according to the 93/42/CE - Portugal CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
J Biocompatbility testing on Class 1 device requirements Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
H EU CE marking for Medical Device Class I EU Medical Device Regulations 2
E Any sample of a full software life cycle IEC 62304 report ( any class )? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
JoCam Certified QMS for MDR - Class I medical device manufacturers EU Medical Device Regulations 8
N Is there a need for clinical test of Class IIa products (for MDR)? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
K CE Marking Class 1 (Non sterile) medical device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
G Voluntary Class I Device Filing Other US Medical Device Regulations 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom