Hello everyone!
My company is pursuing a new medical device license (MDL) application for a Class II active medical device SYSTEM (essentially a stationary exercise bike with an integrated muscle stimulator for general rehabilitation). We've been going back and forth with the reviewers, and the following points have come up:
This seems extremely burdensome and is inconsistent with my prior MDL experience with an earlier generation of this device. I feel like I'm missing something, or the reviewer is, but I can't be sure. I'm hoping someone here can shed some light on the situation! Thanks in advance!
MJB
My company is pursuing a new medical device license (MDL) application for a Class II active medical device SYSTEM (essentially a stationary exercise bike with an integrated muscle stimulator for general rehabilitation). We've been going back and forth with the reviewers, and the following points have come up:
- The guidance document for license application type says, "All the COMPONENTS of a SYSTEM must be listed on the licence application by MEDICAL DEVICE NAME and IDENTIFIERS. The application must provide documentation and information on all COMPONENTS of a SYSTEM."
- Health Canada's definition of "medical device" includes an "accessory, part or component" in the definition, meaning all COMPONENTS of a medical device SYSTEM are defined as medical devices.
- The guidance on device classification, Rule 7, says, "A device . . . is classified as Class II if it is intended . . . to be connected to an active device that is classified as Class II, III or IV."
This seems extremely burdensome and is inconsistent with my prior MDL experience with an earlier generation of this device. I feel like I'm missing something, or the reviewer is, but I can't be sure. I'm hoping someone here can shed some light on the situation! Thanks in advance!
MJB