Re: Cmk - case study
The first thing that I notice is that the gage resolution is quite poor. The data readings are all either 0.078 or 0.079 (the majority being 0.079) ; the spec limit is 0.080. In other words, the number of distinct categoriwes (NDC) is 2 ... AND the spec limit would be the next distinct category! With most of the readings withing 1 unit of the spec limit, I would question carefully the ability of the instrument to truly gage the results.
Given this resolution, then the rest of the analysis is a little shaky. The numbers might be good, but I don't have a lot of confidence in them.
Tim F