CNC Machine Validation Requirement

I

Ironcountry

#1
There is some debate over whether CNC machining operations require validation, whether results are fully verifiable. The sticking point is what does fully verifiable really mean and whether sampling plans verifying only key characteristics are adequate. A recent warning letter issued to a medical device manufacturer included a violation specific to CNC machining and failure to validate also stating that every device must be inspected in lieu of validation.
Input requested.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A

achorste

#2
The Machines will need Installation Qualification at least.

The way we do it here is with IQ & OQ:

IQ - the normal stuff - utilities, training, maintenance plans etc etc

OQ - Verify functionality on the next batch scheduled for the machine.

Mind you we validate the manufacturing process for each product range as well.
 
J

jscholen

#3
CNC's must be validated. Typical IQ/OQ/PQ methodology does not need to apply to every custom program. IQ/OQ is what you need to do once and maybe some revalidation of IQ/OQ as needed.

From their on, you will write custom programs for each specific cutting operation which then need to be PQ'ed. You could basically call this a component qualification, so your main objective is to prove repeatability through multiple set-ups and breakdowns of your tooling (what your machine would expect to see in a typically manufacturing environment).

We had a parallel situation in which our component manufacturer could not validate the process, so we had to inspect each component 100%. We instituted a CNC Inspection Machine that we programmed. So, we had to do the IQ/OQ and then PQ the custom inspection program to show that it was repeatable.

Jeff
 
V

vinh_lex - 2010

#4
We had a parallel situation in which our component manufacturer could not validate the process, so we had to inspect each component 100%. We instituted a CNC Inspection Machine that we programmed. So, we had to do the IQ/OQ and then PQ the custom inspection program to show that it was repeatable.
Jeff
Total agreement. If you cannot make your manufacturer validate the process, additional inspection, or say, verification, need to be in place.

CNC's must be validated. Typical IQ/OQ/PQ methodology does not need to apply to every custom program. IQ/OQ is what you need to do once and maybe some revalidation of IQ/OQ as needed.
Not sure if you can need only 1 OQ for all products. Key process parameters need to be established at this point, so you you need to take product type into account, and revalidate when there's changes in your product portfolio

Can you share a sample package of a complete Validation case when you need only 1 OQ for all?
 
J

jscholen

#5
Not sure if you can need only 1 OQ for all products. Key process parameters need to be established at this point, so you you need to take product type into account, and revalidate when there's changes in your product portfolio
Agreed.

Since my comment was done so long ago, I suspect that I was referring too a CNC machine that may do the same operation(cutting) for multiple custom cutting programs.

Example: If you use a CNC mill and you typically use cutting tools ranging in size from 1mm to 25mm, then for the OQ, I would establish the precision of the mill for the 1mm, 12mm and 25mm cutting bits(with the justification that the precision of other "in between" sizes can be extrapolated) . I would run several custom cutting programs at the extremes of the table, low and high end of the cutting speed and feed speed and then measure the results to show where the mills limitations lie.

An example of multiple OQ would be a packaging line with multiple size boxes. Although you could theoretically establish a range of box sizes to run in one OQ, I suspect that it would be very difficult to try and capture the multitude of box configurations in one OQ, hence I would recommend a custom OQ for each product or product line.
 
J

JaxQC

#6
One other train of thought. Yes look at the operating range you’re looking at (smallest/biggest) but also break it out by the variables (X axis, Y axis & Z axis). ie What can you hold / how good is the machine in each of the directions? A second item in addition to the axis’s is the interpolation or change from one axis to the other (X-Y, X-Z, Y-Z …). How smooth / precise is the transition from one direction to antother.
 
A

alex.Kennedy

#7
Validation applies to all the parameters that you are going to use. It also applies to the maintenance, calibration and predictive analysis of your CNC machines. The regulators are getting tough with companies that are treating validation very casually.
There are currently several devices being recalled some of which are implanted, the overall costs are enormous.
Validation starts at the intended use (User Requirements Specification) continuous through design to the (Design Qualification) then to the IQ/OQ/PQ. Without the URS in place your IQ/OQ/PQ have no relevance.

Alex Kennedy
 
P

PoorDad

#8
Applying this to a job-shop medical device manufacturer...

Considering that we run a variety of products through our lathes and mills, what is the proper way per the FDA to setup our IQ/OQ/PQ?

I need to understand whether the FDA will expect that every combination of axes and every cubic inch of usable working envelope have been included in the validation. What about variety of materials? Types of cuts made in the machine? If we have multiple machines of the same brand and type, can some of this work blanket the lot of them?


Thanks in advance.
 
J

jscholen

#9
We have a supplier that extrudes for us, but they are a job shop with multiple machines used to extrude the same component. Each machine can very well have a completely different set of operating parameters. With many more clients then ourselves, it would be difficult to plan a production run on a single machine since they would possibly have the machine occupied for a longer period of time with another customers job.

Depending on the complexity and volume of your components, a in-line inspection process might be more cost effective then running a multi-machine validation effort IF your current production needs can support it...but I think that greater scrutiny will be placed on data capture to show objectively that the inspection is occurring and works adequately. It really depends on what your customer needs/wants and what they are willing to pay.

As more companies such as yourself get into the mix of supplying to medical device companies, they will need to be more adept to the needs to their customers(ie, medical device speak....it's music to my ears when a supplier ALREADY understands my need for V&V activities).

The specific things you can do ahead of time, regardless of customer inputs:
-Document the installation of each machine...i suggest you dig up the user manual and create a checklist that ensures you installed it according to manufacturers instruction. If the manufacturer installed it for you, they should have given you a signed statement of installation....this could be used as your IQ...just have your own internal document or form state you are accepting this as the IQ and have the right people approve it.

-OQ is tough, since your goal is to test the operational range of the specific tool doing the work. You could go through a gamut of possibilities, but you most likely(murphy's law) won't get all of them.

I would suggest you factor in a validation cost to your piece part price and sell the client on your ability to deliver them with a qualified part ready for FDA scrutiny.

I could be wrong on this, but the day is coming when medical device companies looking for suppliers won't even engage with you unless you already understand their needs and are factoring it in.

To your specific question of extrapolating out to multiple machines, I don't recommend this, but that's not to say it can be justified. You will have to show an objective way that the machines are equivalent in processing capability.
 
R

rjhill

#10
I have done cnc validation and know first hand FDA process validation expectations (and how widely varying they can be). My question to the group, do any of you really feel the time and human effort to accomplish this is really adding value or quality to the piece part compared to sample inspection of critical features?

If I was trying to totally eliminate all inspection I could see this. I "perform the ritual", but in my bones think it is of very little value.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P CNC machine validation for Contract Manufacturer of medical devices Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
B SOP for CNC turret punching machine for sheet metal process Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
B IQ/OQ/PQ of CNC Milling Machine Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
GreatNate Qualifying a CNC machine Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
F AS9100D Process Matrix for a small cnc machine shop AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
S Machine Setup for a CNC Machine Capability Study Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1
S Need Continuous improvement Suggestions - Small (30 of us) all-CNC machine shop ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 28
J CNC Machine Tool Calibration - 6 dof Calibration Interferometers General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
P Machine Shop Tool Crib Procedure - Tooling for CNC mills Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
B SPC Software Selection for use in a CNC Machine Shop - InfinityQS and Lighthouse Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 3
K Probe on CNC machine - Inspecting on cnc machine tools vs. CMM Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
Q Operational Qualification of a CNC machine ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
C CNC Machine Operational Qualification Recoverability Testing Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
B Is a work instruction mandatory - CNC machine ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
E Controlling CNC Machine Programs - Your recommendations appreciated Manufacturing and Related Processes 12
J CNC Calibration - What should be calibrated on a HAAS machine? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
M Machine Tool Calibration - Machine Capability Studies on CNC Machine Tools Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
M Volumetric Positioning - Machine capability studies for CNC machine tools General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
R Control of CNC Machine Programs in Engineering Workshops (Aerospace, AS9100) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 20
M Cost Estimating Spreadsheet for a CNC Machine & Weld Shop Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
P SPC in job shop? CNC machine producing a max of 50 pieces per job Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
D Machine Capability Studies on CNC Lathes Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 35
T Pin gage identification in a small CNC/Screw machine job shop General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
J Do CNC Machine Programs need to be Controlled Documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
A CNC Mill and Lathe - Validation Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
R Process Validation on CNC Lathe and Milling machining process Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
R CNC Software Validation requirements as per ISO 13485:2016 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 8
A ISO 9001 Control of Production Equipment - CNC Machines ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
C O-Ring Groove Measurement Method in CNC Machined Parts Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 9
D OQ, PQ Requirement for Aerospace? Recently purchased CNC AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
S FMEA for CNC Manufacturing FMEA and Control Plans 9
V Ultrasonic NDT on CNC Product made of Stainless Steel General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M AS9100 Control of CNC programs AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Quality Assurance Plan template for CNC Milling Industry AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
H Control plan example format for CNC machining activities FMEA and Control Plans 3
H FMEA sample for complete CNC machining process FMEA and Control Plans 1
L Caliper Calibration Standards - One for CNC and one for Sheet Metal? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
C Equipment Qualification of a CNC Mill Center ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
P Internal Audit of CNC Programing Internal Auditing 3
S CNC Machining Process Validation for Prototypes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A Are CNC Program Backups Required by TS 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
G Sampling Plan for Inspection of Metal Parts after CNC Machining Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 34
bobdoering Capability of new CNC machines Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 32
V CNC Probe Qualification and DME Interface General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
B CNC Machining Shop still heavily relies on First Piece and Final QC Inspection Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
A Engineering Production Skills Matrix for Assembly or CNC Machinists Management Review Meetings and related Processes 6
V CNC Process Validation Cpk Ppk & In-Process Inspection Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
R CNC OTS Software Validation Separate from full IQ/OQ/PQ for 21CFR Part 820 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 9
S Receiver Gages vs. CNC CMM Checks Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
M Commercially available software solution for the control of our CNC programs. Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom