So we are reworking out QMS to comply with the updated versions of the standards. We have been TS/QS for 12-15 years or so. Based on recent changes to both the standard and our customer base, we are dropping down to ISO 9001. But we will still have a good automotive presence (We went from 50% auto to 20% auto simply because auto no longer considers off road as applicable). So there still we be a push from our customers to go IATF, but we'll wait until things settle in a bit. As such, there is still the expectation that we be "compliant."
So as we revise our new system towards the new requirements we will include bits and pieces of IATF. Some may be immediately applicable, so may be for future implementation. For example, IATF requires customer specific requirements to be included in the scope. Or it requires Total Productive Maintenance. Or soupped up auditor training. Etc.
My question is, as we go for an ISO 9001 cert, will auditors consider the IATF requirements we have built into our system, but not yet implemented? Or would this trigger a bunch of non-conformances?
So as we revise our new system towards the new requirements we will include bits and pieces of IATF. Some may be immediately applicable, so may be for future implementation. For example, IATF requires customer specific requirements to be included in the scope. Or it requires Total Productive Maintenance. Or soupped up auditor training. Etc.
My question is, as we go for an ISO 9001 cert, will auditors consider the IATF requirements we have built into our system, but not yet implemented? Or would this trigger a bunch of non-conformances?