Comparing the Accuracy of Analog vs. Digital Multimeter

RCW

Quite Involved in Discussions
#1
Is there any way to compare the accuracy of an analog multimeter to a digital multimeter? I would hope the digital is more accurate, but how can you prove it?

Analog Meter Accuracy:
R X 1 -- 2.5 degreees of arc
R X 100 -- 2 degrees of arc
R X 10,000 -- 2 degrees of arc

Digital Meter Accuracy: +(0.9% + 1)

I'm looking at resistance only.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Kales Veggie

People: The Vital Few
#2
Re: Comparing accuracy of analog versus digital multimeter

Is there any way to compare the accuracy of an analog multimeter to a digital multimeter? I would hope the digital is more accurate, but how can you prove it?

Analog Meter Accuracy:
R X 1 -- 2.5 degreees of arc
R X 100 -- 2 degrees of arc
R X 10,000 -- 2 degrees of arc

Digital Meter Accuracy: +(0.9% + 1)

I'm looking at resistance only.
we need more info.

What is the total arc of the analog meter?
Is the digital meter auto ranging?
Is 0.9% error of full scale read out?
What are the read-out ranges on the digital?

Of course with the analog meter, there is also parallax error.
 

Jerry Eldred

Forum Moderator
Super Moderator
#3
Re: Comparing accuracy of analog versus digital multimeter

That's kind of an open-ended question. If the question is generically which is more accurate, I'd say there is no answer. It's kind of analogous to wondering whether a car or truck is faster (that's the best analogy I can come up with for the moment).

There are probably some analogue meters that are more accurate than some digital meters. Some of the mirrored movements on the best analogue meters minimize parallax error. There are perhaps some of the best quality analogue meters that are more accurate than some of the worst digitals.

Some of the limiters on analogues are:
-lower input impedance (loading effect)
-parallax error (as already mentioned in earlier post)
-tilt errors (tilting meter causes errors in varying amounts)
-operator visual interpretation errors (user makes errors in how they
interpret readings).
-movement slop and hysteresis

One of the advantages of old analogues (such as a Simpson 260 Series) is the use of a D Cell to drive the resistance function (higher current capacity). I've heard feedback from technicians who love it because it is much more effective in taking front to back resistance readings in transistors/diodes/etc.

Just a few thoughts.
 
Y

Yew Jin

#4
If we intent to study on measurement accuracy, we should have a standard to refer to. Beside that, we also need to consider on how the traceability of the standard.

For resolution, thumb of rule is 10:1. Digital measurement would always has better resolution compared to the analog measurement system.

Sometime we always confuse on the term between resolution and accuracy.
 

RCW

Quite Involved in Discussions
#5
Background on my question:
I recently went through a process audit by one of my customers. The process was cable wiring and this is to be performed using our customer's process specifications. One of the steps of the process is to verify the continuity of the wiring (i.e. point-to-point check). I was using a Fluke 12 DMM to do this. The customer's process spec did not specifically call this meter out in their list of equipment to use so I was written up for the process deviation.

The process spec does call out the use of a Simpson Model 260 multimeter or equivalent. I spoke to one of the engineers from the company that audited me. He suggested addressing the finding by showing the Fluke 12 is more accurate than the Simpson Model 260, therefore it is equivalent and beyond.

This is what I need to accomplish yet when I compare the two meter specs, it's like comparing apples and oranges.


Simpson Model 260 information -->> http://simpson260.com/downloads/downloads.htm
Fluke 12 information -->> http://us.fluke.com/usen/products/Fluke+12.htm?catalog_name=FlukeUnitedStates
 

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#6
We know that the resolution that you read on the gage is only one factor in gage error. Yes, rule of thumb 10:1 is good, but the overall benefit of digital generally comes from less reading errors and faster reading than it does from accuracy - which can be exactly the same. The true judge of which gage is best for a job is Gage R&R, not just accuracy and certainly not resolution. Perform that study on each gage, and see which one performs the best.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#7
Background on my question:
I recently went through a process audit by one of my customers. The process was cable wiring and this is to be performed using our customer's process specifications. One of the steps of the process is to verify the continuity of the wiring (i.e. point-to-point check). I was using a Fluke 12 DMM to do this. The customer's process spec did not specifically call this meter out in their list of equipment to use so I was written up for the process deviation.

The process spec does call out the use of a Simpson Model 260 multimeter or equivalent. I spoke to one of the engineers from the company that audited me. He suggested addressing the finding by showing the Fluke 12 is more accurate than the Simpson Model 260, therefore it is equivalent and beyond.

This is what I need to accomplish yet when I compare the two meter specs, it's like comparing apples and oranges.


Simpson Model 260 information -->> http://simpson260.com/downloads/downloads.htm
Fluke 12 information -->> http://us.fluke.com/usen/products/Fluke+12.htm?catalog_name=FlukeUnitedStates
If you're doing just a continuity check (i.e., verifying an electrical path between two points) it doesn't matter. On the other hand, if impedance is the issue they should say so, because when you check impedance of a path you're also verifying continuity. If they're concerned about impedance, they should have given you a nominal and tolerance. This is where the accuracy of the meter comes in, and you should be able to demonstrate equivalence by comparing manufacturers' specifications and demonstrate that the meter is properly calibrated.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T Comparing Two Measurement Systems in terms of Accuracy and Capability Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
O Software for comparing text of PDF files Contract Review Process 2
M Comparing data from destructive testing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
A Demonstration of Equivalence - Need for comparing biological characteristics for an SamD EU Medical Device Regulations 1
G Comparing Gauge Blocks - Translating the calibration between the master set and the QA set General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
V Statistical basis and justification while comparing / changing sampling plans Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
N Does FDA allow comparing with the competitors Medical Device 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
L Procedure for Comparing the Monitor Reading with Laboratory Result Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
S Looking for a checklist comparing ISO 13485:2016 and 21 CFR Part 820 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 14
M Comparing the MMOG (v3 or v4) with ISO / TS16949 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
A Comparing US/FDA Drug Regulations against US/FDA Device Regulations US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
E Correct Statistical Test comparing 2 Groups Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 14
R Comparing Laboratory Scope of Accreditation against internal equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
C Comparing Two Independent Group Observations - 95% Confidence Intervals Overlap Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
D Comparing the ISO 9001:2008 standard to ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
S Comparing Quality System Software Features Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 18
C Comparing Two Test Methods - Acceptable Difference(s)? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
M pH Calibration - Comparing Electrical and CRM Methods General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
I Six Sigma comparing to other National and International Models Six Sigma 6
A Comparing Effect of Process Parameters on Equipment Performance during Start Ups Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
P Acceptable Adjusted R Squared Value Comparing 2 Measurement Devices in Minitab Using Minitab Software 3
C Comparing PPM Year over Year - Determining the PPM decrease from 2009 to 2010 Benchmarking 10
M z Test vs. F Test - The most appropriate for comparing the Variances Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
T Comparing two different Ultrasonic Tester Calibration Techniques General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
Q Internal Audit:Comparing Efficiency of Similar Processes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
D Comparing Variation - A CMM and an On-Line Inspection Station Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
N Statistically Comparing Technician Techniques Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 16
C Comparing Histograms - Bimodal Distribution? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
K Comparing CQE vs. MSc. Professional Certifications and Degrees 1
J To PPAP or Not? Comparing two machines (one old and one new) APQP and PPAP 6
C Comparing OHSAS 18001 to the new ANSI Z10 - Where I can get information? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
J Has anyone created a matrix comparing ISO 9001 VS BS 7799 and or ISO 27001? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
A Comparing six sigma & EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) Six Sigma 2
C Comparing what I do against Canada request - Immigration Immigration and Expatriate Topics 4
J KAPPA Statistic - Comparing appraisers ratings to a known standard IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
R Comparing MicroVu?s Vertex machine to OPG?s Smart Scope Flash General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
D Comparing ISO 10012 and 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
S Comparing ISO with PMBOK (Project Management Body of Knowledge) Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
D Comparing Apples and Apples vs. Apples and Oranges QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 8
C Gap Analysis comparing QS-9000 and TS 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 33
J Setting accuracy limit for a read out General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
R Clinical accuracy and repeatability of IR(infrared) thermometer, no maximum error criteria is recommended in ISO Other Medical Device Related Standards 11
R SAT (System Accuracy Test) temperature according to AMS2750E AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
B IEC 60601-2-10 - Accuracy of Pulse Parameters - Required Measurement Uncertainty IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
H Analog Pressure Gauge with no EN837 accuracy class information General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
shimonv IEC 60601-1 Essential Performance - Is the signal accuracy specification an essential requirement? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
G Warning about Deltronic Gage Pins - The "Certification of Accuracy" document General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
G Posting Measuring Equipment Accuracy for User Information General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Gagemaker MT-3000 accuracy for calibration Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 2
J CMM Accuracy Formula General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom