Contract Review - Interpreting the intent of Contract Review - Open POs - Clause 4.3

L

LaurieB

#1
I need some help in interpreting the intent of Contract Review. Is is considered the same for ongoing PO's as it is for an initial contract, where you review feasibility & whether you can perform to the customers satisfaction? If I accept an order for a COD that is for a stock item, new customer, am I bound by the laws of 4.3?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#2
Yes, you are bound by contract review for a new customer. BUT - the review can be as simple as the person taking the order ensuring thaqt the catalogue number is correct. The extent of any review is proportional to the risks.

In so far as on-going POs, once the original PO is 'reviewed' any further review will be limited to something simple such as how many are ordered and such. Keep a log. Document some basic guidelines for 'types' of reviews. Don't over complicate the issue.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#3
From: [email protected] (Doug Pfrang)
Subject: Re: Q: Contract Review in a Catch 22 Situation /Scalies/Pfrang

>From: Charley Scalies <[email protected]>
>Subject: Q: Contract Review in a Catch 22 Situation /Scalies
>
>Here is a new thread for discusssion. It is based on an actual case.
>
>As a matter of standard practice, an ISO9001 registered firm takes
>orders by telephone. The seller's sales representative recommends - and
>the buyer consents to - purchase of an extended on-site repair warranty.
>When the product arrives, it's defective. The replacement product is also
>defective. In attempting to return the defective product for a full refund, the
>customer is then informed of the terms of the seller's warranty which
>excludes seller's liability for return shipping costs. The customer is
>now in the position of having to pay freight costs for the "pleasure" of
>having an unusable product. There was no mention of such warranty
>provisions at the time the phone order was placed.
>1. Under the scope and intent of the standard, particularly 4.3, is the
>seller under a positive obligation to reveal the material terms of that
>warranty at the time of the sale?
>2. Is the customer entitled to issue a Corrective Action based on
>nonconformance with 4.3?

Charley,

Interesting questions, however, I don't see a Catch 22.

First, an editorial comment. I don't entirely agree with the statement that the customer "is now in the position of having to pay freight costs for the 'pleasure' of having an unusable product." Although your observation is technically correct, there are other, arguably more likely, situations in which it makes sense for the buyer to pay return freight. For example, from the seller's perspective, the fault for the so-called "defective" product might lie with the freight carrier or even with the buyer himself. In the former case, it is reasonable for the buyer to pay the return freight, because the buyer should have filed a damage claim with the carrier. In the latter case, it is also reasonable for the buyer to pay the return freight, because the buyer broke the product. Another situation is when the buyer buys the product, uses it for a while, and then sends it back for a refund even though it has not malfunctioned. In this case, it is again reasonable for the buyer to pay the return freight because the seller has already paid outbound freight costs, plus gets back a used product in place of the new product that was sent out. If we assume that most situations of returned goods are one of these that I've described, and not the repeated manufacturing defects that you described, then it will be reasonable, in most situations, for the buyer to pay the return freight.

Now, as regards your first question, the buyer and seller are both responsible for agreeing on warranty terms; the burden is not solely on the seller. Your question seems to assume that the seller withheld that information, but it is equally the burden on the buyer to inquire. If the buyer does not read or ask about the terms of the seller's "on-site repair warranty," then the buyer, not the seller, is at fault.

As regards your second question, I don't know of any company that allows customers to "issue a corrective action [request]" for any reason; the responsibility for issuing corrective action requests lies with the seller. The customer might complain about not being aware of the return goods policy, which might cause the seller to issue a corrective action to make this information more explicit in the purchase documents or phone order-taking process, but the seller might decide the customer is at fault for not asking about the warranty terms when the customer placed the order.

ISO-9000 is a quality system standard for sellers, not a license for customers to be stupid.

-- Doug Pfrang
 
A

Andy Bassett

#4
Can i just throw something in here. On the train to Hannover this morning i was sweating over the some study notes for a unit of a Purchasing Diploma 'Legal Aspects'.

Now i would think that European and American Contract Law is not so far apart, if this is the case maybe this can help.

The fact that freight will not be paid by the seller when defect goods are returned is an 'exclusion clause' and as such has to be agreed at the time the contract was made. So if the contract was made over the telephone ie 'How much?... OK i will take them', and no exclusion clauses were mentioned they are not valid.

Example Olley v Marlborough. A client booked into a hotel and subsequently had something stolen, the hotel owners said they were protected by a disclaimer hung in the hotel bedroom. 'Invalid' said the courts because this was introduced after the contract was made (ie agreeing room price and availability at the reception).

A second possibility is that the seller sends an Order Confirmation with the goods with this nasty exclusion clause in. If the buyer takes delivery of these goods then he has effectively accepted the contract terms, this is known as the 'Battle of the Forms', the last party to issue contract terms generally wins the arguement.

I hope i havent put the quality boys too sleep.

Regards



------------------
Andy B
 
L

lhanzky

#5
procedure for contract review of testing samples

Hi everyone! need some help regarding procedure for CONTRACT REVIEW for testinf samples in laboratory.Thanks!
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#7
Re: procedure for contract review of testing samples

Hi everyone! need some help regarding procedure for CONTRACT REVIEW for testinf samples in laboratory.Thanks!
You posted the same question in another forum. There's no need for multiple posting--post once and be patient. You'll get plenty of responses.
 
T

tsltubes

#8
Re: Contract Review - Interpreting the intent of Contract Review - Open POs - Clause

I am looking for Contract review format/ template what is being used conforming TS16949 requirements for asutomotive component supplier. Can anybody help me?
 
T

tsltubes

#10
Re: Contract Review - Interpreting the intent of Contract Review - Open POs - Clause

stijloor- thankx..it helped us. can we have any sample or template for "history sheet" and "customer satisfaction survey" ?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C Contract Review with Multiple Line items ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Nicole Desouza Contract / Customer Order Review Checklist Needed Manufacturing and Related Processes 12
C AS9100D Contract Review Contract Review Process 8
J KPI's for AS9100 Cl. 8.2/8.5 - Bids/Contract Review/Order Entry AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
R The difference between Feasibility Assessment and Contract Review Contract Review Process 2
R Review of "Key Data" for contract labs, but SOP doesn't define "key data". Problem? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 2
S Risk Management during Contract Review AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 14
V Own Brand Labeling Agreement/Contract Review ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Q Can anyone share Contract Review forms that I can use as record? Contract Review Process 7
S Evidence of Contract Review for External Calibration Laboratory Contract Review Process 7
R Suggestions for a practical way to manage Contract Review Contract Review Process 5
H Explaination of Launch Readiness & Contract Review and APQP Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
P Contract Employee: 3 Month Review - What to discuss? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
H Example of Contract Review for Print Industry wanted Contract Review Process 4
R Involvement of several Departments in Contract Review Process Contract Review Process 12
C Contract Review Template for an Inspection, Repair and Manufacturing Facility wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
I Supplier (Vendor) Contract Review Process Contract Review Process 11
G Audit Nonconformance - 7.2.2 - Contract Review (Review of Requirements) Contract Review Process 16
B Differentiating between "Review of Requirements" and "Contract Review" AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
Tom W Contract Review Definition in a Couple Sentences Contract Review Process 3
K AS9100:2009 Process Checklist (Contract Review) - Feedback wanted Contract Review Process 4
M Request for clarification on ISO 9001 Clause 7.2.2 (Contract Review) Contract Review Process 5
U Contract Review Process help and Software Recommendations Contract Review Process 8
V Contract Review for Repeated POs from Medical, Aerospace and Automotive Customers Contract Review Process 1
I Employment Contract Review - Categories of International Mobile Workers Contract Review Process 1
V Contract Review Process and Feasibility Analysis and Review Contract Review Process 2
S "Contract Manufacturing" - How to review the existing ISO14001 documents ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
C ISO 9001:2008 Contract Review for a business that doesn't have formal contract review Contract Review Process 11
B How to Conduct a Review of Customer Order (Contract Review)? Contract Review Process 5
M Input Request on Contract Review Procedure Contract Review Process 5
S Contract Review Procedure for a Manufacturing Business Contract Review Process 2
D Review of Contract for a Part with a Safety Characteristic Contract Review Process 4
L Contract Review Procedure for testing of samples in a laboratory Contract Review Process 3
A Definition Contract Review - What exactly is "Contract Review"? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 7
L How often should the contract review be done? TS 16949 Contract Review Process 2
F Contract Review Frequency - Is there a need for Annual Review? Contract Review Process 11
J Contract Review - Please help me define the requirement 7.2.2 Info needed Contract Review Process 9
G Does anyone have a Contract Review Procedure I can view? Contract Review Process 5
G How can we clean up Contract Review Contract Review Process 7
G Enquiry and Contract Records - Review and Approval Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
Q Contract Review? Superseding Specifications (Handling) Contract Review Process 5
N Contract Review Question - China manufacturing site to exclude 7.2.2? Contract Review Process 6
P Missing Contract Review Records on Boeing and USAir Contracts Contract Review Process 31
S Purchase Order Problems? Contract Review Issues - Sheet metal industry Contract Review Process 6
N Practically implementing ISO 9001:2000 Clause 7.2.2 Contract Review Contract Review Process 10
P Architect's Client Doesn't Know What He Wants - Contract Review Process Contract Review Process 17
N Contract Review Consolidation - Two different manufacturing sites Contract Review Process 2
O Contract Review Procedures Contract Review Process 10
M Contract Review Process - Risk Analysis - 7.2.2.2 Manufacturing feasibility Contract Review Process 4
P AS9100 Contract Review - Can the Sales Manager be the process owner? Contract Review Process 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom