Contract Review? Superseding Specifications (Handling)

Q

QC Rick

#1
In a nut shell, when dealing with customer Blue Prints (B/P) and the text within including Engineering Orders (changes to the B/P) how do individual companies handle Superseding Specifications (S/S) in that, I mean; when a B/P states a spec that has been S/S what do you put in your PO/Work Instructions/Etc?

So far, I have held employment in the north eastern Mid West (Ohio) and Southwestern (Arizona) territories. Nothing in both territories is different in that companies take verbatim the text on the B/P and apply to the PO/Work Instructions/Etc. without or minimal information of S/S requirements thus leaving all the research to whomever is involved with that particular spec.
In my field of expertise (Aero Space), customers are notorious for not updating B/P's and leaving information trails via S/S specs, a quagmire of information in many cases; the customer declares it is too expensive to update their B/Ps but I believe they fail to see the expense involved for all parties that have to interpret this muddled mess.

Personally I have always believed the PO/Work Instructions/Etc should state the S/S spec and reference the original spec. If the original spec is required specifically, then list it itself.

Example: (Passivation)
AMS-QQ P 35 "Passivation Treatments for Corrosion-resistant Steel".
S/S by SAE-AMS 2700 and S/S for DoD with ASTM-A967 (we actually have a customer who doesn't recognize ASTM-A967 and requires SAE-AMS 2700).
I believe in this case the S/S SAE document is verbatim of the AMS document, only control has changed, 98% of the time our PO/Work Instructions/Etc will state "AMS-QQ P 35", the B/P text.

Your opinions/suggestions and or information as always is appreciated! :cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
#2
I have moved this thread from the reading room to Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics because I feel it relates to the business process of Contract Review. Any other thought - please click the "report post button to alert Moderators.
 
D

domingue

#3
We've run into this before too, especially with that same passivation spec. :)topic: I think they're not verbatim the same. I was just at the SAE G-3 committee meeting in Dallas, and there was a lot of discussion about why they took the big table out of the spec listing what Type to use for what material. Incidentally, that table is in the NASC's Appendix Q, which no one gets to see except the NASC. Awesome.) MIL-C-5541 S/S by MIL-DTL-5541 also comes to mind.

Our instructions list the current spec. We've never had a problem with this since the trail of supersession is there back to the document listed on the print. We deal with a very small range of special processes anyway, so we're all very familiar with the current spec for each of them.

As an additional side note, on rare occasions, some customer wants the old spec, NOT the current supersession. Of course then, we reference that in our instructions.
 
Q

QC Rick

#4
NASC = TSNS (Top Secret Ninja *hit) :notme:

Currently, with our entire customer base we deal with 1954 specifications, including S/S documents. It can get confusing very quickly!
 
D

domingue

#5
NASC = TSNS (Top Secret Ninja *hit) :notme:
Indeed. Good thing we participate in it. I can't imagine how long it would have taken us to get the NAS1924 standard changed otherwise. It took us 18 months to get it through as it is, and we were the ones drawing it. I thought the Primes were slow with these things, but GEEZ - they're like Speedy Gonzales compared to the standards committees.

To the point though, have you found some benefit to mentioning the old reference? I'd imagine it would only serve to confuse as long as it's not to be used in the actual processing. Did an auditor ask you to put it there to make it easier to trace? I'm interested - maybe I'm missing out and I should document that link better.
 
Q

QC Rick

#6
No benefit at all, in fact I believe it is a detriment if anything. I prefer, as previously stated, to list the latest S/S spec and reference the original spec, example: SAE-AMS-QQ-P 35 (AMS-QQ-P 35) "list specific instructions, blah, blah, blah".

Never had an auditor complain, less having to do research to determine traceability, the research is our chief complaint, it is very hard to memorize 1954 spec's.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J NCR- Failure of contract review process - NADCAP audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
Y Procedures on Contract Review Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
bryan willemot Contract Review and risk managment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
J Can signed agreements over-ride review of every "contract" under ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
C Contract Review with Multiple Line items ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Nicole Desouza Contract / Customer Order Review Checklist Needed Manufacturing and Related Processes 12
C AS9100D Contract Review Contract Review Process 8
J KPI's for AS9100 Cl. 8.2/8.5 - Bids/Contract Review/Order Entry AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
R The difference between Feasibility Assessment and Contract Review Contract Review Process 2
R Review of "Key Data" for contract labs, but SOP doesn't define "key data". Problem? Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 2
S Risk Management during Contract Review AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 14
V Own Brand Labeling Agreement/Contract Review ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Q Can anyone share Contract Review forms that I can use as record? Contract Review Process 7
S Evidence of Contract Review for External Calibration Laboratory Contract Review Process 7
R Suggestions for a practical way to manage Contract Review Contract Review Process 5
H Explaination of Launch Readiness & Contract Review and APQP Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
P Contract Employee: 3 Month Review - What to discuss? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
H Example of Contract Review for Print Industry wanted Contract Review Process 4
R Involvement of several Departments in Contract Review Process Contract Review Process 12
C Contract Review Template for an Inspection, Repair and Manufacturing Facility wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
I Supplier (Vendor) Contract Review Process Contract Review Process 11
G Audit Nonconformance - 7.2.2 - Contract Review (Review of Requirements) Contract Review Process 16
B Differentiating between "Review of Requirements" and "Contract Review" AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
T Contract Review Definition in a Couple Sentences Contract Review Process 3
K AS9100:2009 Process Checklist (Contract Review) - Feedback wanted Contract Review Process 4
M Request for clarification on ISO 9001 Clause 7.2.2 (Contract Review) Contract Review Process 5
U Contract Review Process help and Software Recommendations Contract Review Process 8
V Contract Review for Repeated POs from Medical, Aerospace and Automotive Customers Contract Review Process 1
I Employment Contract Review - Categories of International Mobile Workers Contract Review Process 1
V Contract Review Process and Feasibility Analysis and Review Contract Review Process 2
S "Contract Manufacturing" - How to review the existing ISO14001 documents ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
C ISO 9001:2008 Contract Review for a business that doesn't have formal contract review Contract Review Process 11
B How to Conduct a Review of Customer Order (Contract Review)? Contract Review Process 5
M Input Request on Contract Review Procedure Contract Review Process 5
S Contract Review Procedure for a Manufacturing Business Contract Review Process 2
D Review of Contract for a Part with a Safety Characteristic Contract Review Process 4
L Contract Review Procedure for testing of samples in a laboratory Contract Review Process 3
A Definition Contract Review - What exactly is "Contract Review"? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 7
L How often should the contract review be done? TS 16949 Contract Review Process 2
F Contract Review Frequency - Is there a need for Annual Review? Contract Review Process 11
J Contract Review - Please help me define the requirement 7.2.2 Info needed Contract Review Process 9
G Does anyone have a Contract Review Procedure I can view? Contract Review Process 5
G How can we clean up Contract Review Contract Review Process 7
G Enquiry and Contract Records - Review and Approval Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
N Contract Review Question - China manufacturing site to exclude 7.2.2? Contract Review Process 6
P Missing Contract Review Records on Boeing and USAir Contracts Contract Review Process 31
S Purchase Order Problems? Contract Review Issues - Sheet metal industry Contract Review Process 6
N Practically implementing ISO 9001:2000 Clause 7.2.2 Contract Review Contract Review Process 10
P Architect's Client Doesn't Know What He Wants - Contract Review Process Contract Review Process 17
N Contract Review Consolidation - Two different manufacturing sites Contract Review Process 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom