In most cases if you don’t know much about SPC ‘select’ all of the rules.
The ‘sigma’ level has NOTHING to do with which rules you choose.
What do you mean by: “
if your process is 3 sigma the rules must be 4”?
I am concerned by your statement regarding the ‘standard’ level: control limits have NOTHING to do with the specifications (or “standards”)
Bond (or wire) pull in semiconductor assembly is a non-homogenous process as the pull strength will vary by wire lot, bonder set-up and pad location (which affects wire length). You cannot simply blindly apply the rules, sample size or sampling frequency or the type of control chart.
The type of chart and the rational subgrouping scheme you choose are far more important than which rules you use. At your level of understanding you should use them all and keep referring to Miner’s explanation of the rules in order to learn.
Start reading Donald Wheeler’s articles on SPC. You can find them at SPCPRESS.com. You will want to start with rational subgrouping and the myths of SPC. read all of the articles. SPC is a deep and complex science. It is not enough to take some data and throw it into a software program…that is malpractice.
Wheeler, Donald J., “Myths About Shewhart’s Control Charts”, SPC Tool Kit column, Quality Digest, September, 1996
http://www.qualitydigest.com/sep96/spctool.html
Wheeler, Donald, J., “Foundations of Shewhart’s Charts”, SPC Tool Kit column, Quality Digest, October, 1996
http://www.qualitydigest.com/oct96/spctool.html
Wheeler, Donald, “What is a Rational Subgroup?”, Quality Digest, October 1997
SPCTool
Wheeler, Donald, “Rational Subgrouping”, Quality Digest, June 2015
http://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/quality-insidercolumn/060115-rational-subgrouping.html
Wheeler, Donald, “Rational Sampling”, Quality Digest, July 2015
Rational Sampling