Control of M&TE - Clear distinction between VERIFICATION, CHECKING, and CALIBRATION

D

Dumisani Zikhali

#1
Please assist me to interpret the standard with regards to making the clear distinction between VERIFICATION, CHECKING, and CALIBRATION. I have always sent the Master device to outside calibrators and obliviously state on the purchase order that ‘measurement standard to be traceable to International or national standard or any other suitable controlled master’. I then use the calibrated Master device to verify other internal devices in usage to validate the measurement result.

I had a lengthy debate with a colleague; he argues that a check by devices in usage against an uncalibrated Master device is acceptable. He states that there is no requirement in the standard to carry out calibration on the device including the Master device. Please advise how the standard is interpreted regarding the above.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ettore

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
help

I don't understand if your colleague has looked at 7.6 and ISO 10012-1?
  • a) be calibrated or verified at specified intervals, or prior to use, against measurement standards traceable to international or national measurement standards ; where no such standards exist, the basis used for calibration or verification shall be recorded;
But, the debate, couldn't be started for the misunderstandig about the selection of the devices that you have to calibrate? Or not :bigwave:
 
D

Daryl Montie

#3
As for...."making the clear distinction between VERIFICATION, CHECKING, and CALIBRATION"... There is no clear distinction in the definitions and the terms tend to be thrown about interchangeably. I have a clear idea about what I am sure of each of these means but I have run into many others as sure in their convictions with different ideas. The definition of these terms was discussed at the A2LA Conclave this year. In the end, there was no resolution.

*** DEAD LINK REMOVED ***

When someone claims to be an expert and has the absolute correct definition of these terms, they are stating only what they believe, which is worth as much as any other opinion.

As for your equipment, I don't see how your colleague's argument holds any validity and I don't even know what the standard is. Depending on the stability, history, etc., it should be check at least once (with traceability yada yada yada).
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Staff member
Super Moderator
#4
There is a simple answer. VIM (International vocabulary of general and specific terms in metrology) puts a requirement on calibration that it have (1) an unbroken chain of comparison to National or international standards, and (2) stated uncertainties at each step.

That is calibration, internal or external.

Checking and verification are effectively the same, in that you are checking the whatever to verify it against a standard.

That is NOT calibration.

Hope this helps.

Hershal
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#5
Hershal said:
Checking and verification are effectively the same, in that you are checking the whatever to verify it against a standard.

That is NOT calibration.
Checking a "whatever" to verify it against a standard is calibration.
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
If it is an unbroken chain of comparisons AND you calculate the measurement uncertainty, then I might agree with you.....

Typical shop checks do not include calculations for measurement uncertainty however.

Hershal
 
D

David Hartman

#7
JSW05 said:
Checking a "whatever" to verify it against a standard is calibration.
So your stating that a ruler can be "calibrated". What actions can be taken to "calibrate" a rule?

I understand that we're talking semantics, but I have always associated "calibration" with making adjustments. On the other hand, verifications (checking) are comparisons against a standard where an item that can be "calibrated" is then adjusted, and one that can't (as in a rule) is replaced as required.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#8
ddhartma said:
So your stating that a ruler can be "calibrated". What actions can be taken to "calibrate" a rule?



I understand that we're talking semantics, but I have always associated "calibration" with making adjustments. On the other hand, verifications (checking) are comparisons against a standard where an item that can be "calibrated" is then adjusted, and one that can't (as in a rule) is replaced as required.
Don't underestimate the importance of semantics. It's critical that we all understand what we're talking about, and if the standard denotation of a word has been given a different contextual connotation, there's danger of misunderstanding. In our work--especially in automotive and aerospace applications--"calibration" might involve more than just comparison to a standard, as Hershal points out in referring to MU and traceability (although traceability is a requirement for calibration rather than part of the definition).

Even with the special definition though, calibration does not necessarily involve adjustment. What happens if a device is due for calibration but no adjustment is necessary? The fact that it's been compared to the standard means that it has been calibrated. You wouldn't take it out of service because it didn't have to be adjusted. The ruler isn't the best example because no adjustment is possible. That doesn't mean that rulers shouldn't be in the calibration system. The typical procedure involves an initial verification of the scale and subsequent periodic verification that the scale is still legible and that there hasn't been any damage that might affect measurement accuracy.
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
The first question about rulers is can they be calibrated? Yes, since calibration is an unbroken chain of comparisons to national or international standards, and the measurement uncertainty is staed at each step.

The real question is why in the world someone would calibrate a ruler.....with the possible exception of the finest metal ones, or NIST's new nano-ruler.

Hershal
 
#10
Hershal said:
The real question is why in the world someone would calibrate a ruler.....with the possible exception of the finest metal ones, or NIST's new nano-ruler.Hershal
LOL - I have 2 calibrated rules in my lab, and I had them certified when ordered from Starret. They do not have a recall on them; therefore, it was a one time calibration "check". Personally, I think it's silly also, but try communicating your rational to auditors that don't understand metrology.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Z How does Japanese Customs Clear and Control Devices shipped into Japan? Japan Medical Device Regulations 3
D Control Number for Class III and IV devices Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
J Document Control Metrics Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
I Document Control Software Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
T Controlling Expandable Forms in Paper-Based Document Control System Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
N ISO 13485 7.3.9 Change control in medical device software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C UDI Questions on Control Units Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
A Quality Control Datasheets Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
M Control-self assessment Internal Auditing 5
GreatNate Master Control QMS software Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 0
A Prototype control plan FMEA and Control Plans 2
J Records Control - Does each individual record need to be numbered? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2
shimonv Document Control Procedure Header Content Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
W FMEA - Current control and occurrence rating FMEA and Control Plans 3
S Which department should prepare the control plan? could you show me a standard regarding to this matter. FMEA and Control Plans 17
G Control Plan & PFMEA Review Procedure? FMEA and Control Plans 1
N What are the software audit and control steps Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
A Fabric roll inspection - What type of Control Chart to use? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
C Monitoring and Control Instruments RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 3
M ISO14971:2019 - Verification of implementation and effectiveness of risk control ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
T Risks arising from control measures vs. ineffective control measures ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 11
J Need Change Control Yes/No Decision Tree Template ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
P IQ, OQ, PQ protocol, and report templates for Distributed Control Systems in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Systems. Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
R Risk control measures as per ISO 14971 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 6
T Linking Control Plans and PFMEA's FMEA and Control Plans 3
L How to add exemption or statement to control of document procedure? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
T PFMEA and Control Plans on legacy product FMEA and Control Plans 5
P IATF 16949 requirement - error-proofing in control plan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
C 8.5.1.1 Control of Equipment, Tools, and Software Programs - Questions about the extent of control of NC programs AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
Q Version/Revision Control of CAD files Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
earl62 What is the best way to control special characteristics in Control plan? Is it Mandatory to have SPC for IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
I Control Plan (Product/Process specification/ Tolerance) acceptance FMEA and Control Plans 27
Sravan Manchikanti How to interpret '8.3 Control of nonconforming product' for SaMD device while implementing ISO 13485 & MDSAP ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Z Putting back excluded rows/data points in a control chart Using Minitab Software 0
J Control Plan use on the manufacturing floor FMEA and Control Plans 4
E Change in control plan - Do I have to do sampling? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
D All Dimensions listed on control plan FMEA and Control Plans 10
W Need for current design or process control FMEA and Control Plans 2
Q ISO 9001 8.5.1 - Control of production and service performance ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A What is the difference between Design Process, Process Design and Design Control? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
A Beginners help with ISO3951-2 Combined control s-method n>5 what is Phi ?? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
C Corrective action for failure in documents control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
B Control chart and sample time Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
DuncanGibbons Manufacturing Plan vs Material Specification vs Control Plan Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
J Control chart for huge sample size Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 9
K Contamination Control - Class Is medical devices (Clause 6.4.2 ISO 13485:2016 (E)) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
J 510(k) for a control kit for an external IVD test kit 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
T Assessing Hazard-Related Use Scenarios where control measures exist through standards IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 32
adir88 Documenting Risk Control Option Analysis ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 8
T Design Control Procedures later in the Development Process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom