Conversion TO ISO9001:2000 / TS16949:2002E

Courier

another day closer
conversion TO ISO9001:2000/TS16949:2002E

Is there a chart or something here that can show the conversion or the "old element to new element" in ISO9001:1994/QS9000 3rd edition over to the new elements of ISO9001:2000 / TS 16949:2002E ? I am trying to start up a new audit schedule for 2004 year and we are going to be changing over to the new TS in same year and i want to start to tie old elements into what will be our new ones to audit i.e. old element 4.2 = new ?.? type of chart. thanks
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Courier,

There are several guides available thru AIAG. I have used the ISO/TS 16949:2002 Implementation Guide (publication CQI-7) and found it useful as a cross-reference. There is a Gap Analysis (publication CQI-6) which I have not seen or used. I would imagine these publications are costly, especially if you're not a member.

BSI did a decent gap analysis that may be posted in a thread somewhere. I'm certain other cove members have some good examples.
 
conversion TO ISO9001:2000/TS16949:2002E

Thanks Sandra
maybe you can send me a copy of what you have and if anybody here is a member of AIAG they can get a free copy
Price Information:
AIAG Members:
Electronic copy - FREE for downloading from our Members-Only Web Site
(Password required to sign on)
Non-members: Not available for non-members
If anybody has a copy or can get it i would love to see this.
lIt would indeed be a time saver for me. :thanx: :thanx: :thanx:
 
Actually I posted a similar pdf file that was written by Rad Smith, one of the original QS-9000 authors.
 
Up to date?

ralphsulser said:
I have a file that compares QS9000 to TS16949. I will attach it for your review. I think I found it here on the Cove some time ago.
Hope this helps.
Has anyone checked to see if its up-to-date or not?
 
I first saw a version of the comparison matrix before the TS 16949:2002 standard was released. Rad updated the matrix not long after the final standard was issued. AFAIK it's up-to-date with the standard itself, but it has no consideration at all for customer specific requirements...
 
Back
Top Bottom