COPs (Customer Oriented Processes), Turtle Diagrams and an Octopus or Two

R

Roger Eastin

#1
Anyone heard of these yet? I haven't seen much discussion in this forum yet, but our registrar and others who have had the training are talking them up! The TS - 2nd edition training for registrars and internal auditors apparently stress these tools heavily. Has anyone developed your COPs yet with supporting turtle diagrams? Are you doing them for your registrar or letting your registrar do them themselves? I am just curious how this is being handled by our TS superstars out there!! (This TS stuff is starting to sound like the Animal Planet to me! Crocky!)
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

Randy Stewart

#2
Turtles

We have used the Turtle Diagrams to show people how different there understanding of desired inputs and required inputs are. It has helped.

I agree some of this sounds funny. If you have been around any kind of electrical troubleshooting you would recognize a bubble chart. Just another name for something developed a long long time ago. These charts would show you the desired a o'scope reading on the input side and the output side. As simple as it sounds if the input was good and output bad then there was an issue with the process or circuit.

Turtle diagrams are good when you want to show how 1 process affect the next downstream. Upstream has an idea of what the next op wants and puts it on the paper as their output. When compared to what the downstream op needs for input can be eye opening.

Once again, new name for old methods.
 
S
#3
COP's, Turtle and octopus diagrams are methods used st the supplier auditor course as an aid in defining processes. They are not a requirement of TS2. However, some CB's are requiring the use of these methods, including some variations of their own.

COP's or customer oriented processes is nothing more than names of processes within your facility,1.e., market analysis, Design&development, Production.

The turtle diagram first developed by P. Crosby (1982) is used to identify the requirements of the process. For TS2 purposes it is used for gathering information about a process in order to perform an adequate audit. I have described this in depth in other posts.

The octopus was develped by Ford and is a circle with ten input and output loops around the perimeter. This helps in identifying COP's.
 
M

M Greenaway

#5
Excellent db, and there is a bonus point for those that can spot the similarity with IDEF0.
 
B

Brian Dowsett

#6
COPS & Audit Worksheet

We're struggling on COP's too. I got hold of a "Process Approach" audit worksheet, which apparently is taught in accreditation body training and is thought to be (once filled in) a good starter for sending info to the accreditors prior to the audit.

It has 8 columns and lists the COP, then the Support processes, then the management processes, then more columns for various stuff.

My question - has anyone got a completed one I could look at please, as even with the associated instructions I'm still not sure what info is needed.

Also, I tried to represent our processes and their associated linkages on paper and invented the "Four portions of spaghetti" diagram.

Cheers

Brian
 
#9
Sam, I finally got around to looking at your spreadsheet. In a different thread, we discussed the need to "map" processes, and how to meet the requirments without mapping. This looks like it can do the job nicely. It doesn't have the visual effect of a graphic, but I really like listing the QM and procedures. In fact, if this is kept electronically, you could hyperlink to the actual document.

Good job!
 
#10
db, thanks for the feedback. This form is a modified version, by our CB, of the audit worksheet that was used at the AIAG supplier auditor class.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S TS 16949 Clause 4.1: COPs (Customer Oriented Processes) and Process Flow IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 14
M Customer Oriented Processes: Where are the COPS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
M Are COPs, SOPs, and MOPs required by IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Hershal Giving Back - Teddy Bear Cops Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
Q COPS, MOPS and SOPS - Where is the shall? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
U Management Action Plan (MAP) for the COPs. Does ISO/TS required MAP? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
B Objectives for each process, COPs, MOP's and SOP's - How many is enough? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
J TS 16949 - Has anyone used this form for your COPS, MOPS & SOPS? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
A Process Tool Attached - 'Process title page' to describe all links, COPs, MOPs, SOPs IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
D Customer requirements on specific standards Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 4
Crimpshrine13 Customer Scorecards - Missing Scorecard from one Customer IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 27
B Customer Preference Testing Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
T No Customer Response to an SCR Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
D Customer Specific Requirements / Customer Requirements for Indirect Customers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
H Customer Specific Change in a SaaS SAMD IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
B Put on escalation by customer? is there a requirement to notify registrar? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
P 7.5.10 Customer property - applies to leased/rented equipment? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
M Customer Property - ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.5.10 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
R Cpk demands from automotive customer Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 8
briteme4 Customer Requests FAI on Tooling Fixture AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
D Suggestions for Ishikawa for hyperdetailed customer - plastic molding automotive parts Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
J WAIVED ON Q1 - We Don't have to comply with FORDS customer specific requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Customer Approval (Medical Devices) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
M Reduce occurrence rating based on the PMS data and customer complaint data ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
M IATF16949 Clause 9.1.2.1e - Customer notification related IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
G Too many customer complaints Customer Complaints 16
lanley liao Does the customer`s trademark belong to customer-supplied property? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
J Customer Complaint & SCAR, false data Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
S Annual Inspection Layout - Based on Customer print ? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
G Risk of stopping your customer's line IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S Calibration/Verification of customer fixtures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D CB and customer audits considered as internal audits? General Auditing Discussions 9
O Informational Ford Motor Company Customer Specific Requirements for IATF 16949:2016 - 08 Jan 2021 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
G Bad Parts cause Customer line stop IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
O IATF 16949 News Ford Motors Customer Specific Requirements Update - Nov 2020 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
D Question regarding customer feedback process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Change Approval Requirements - Does every change need formal customer approval? Design and Development of Products and Processes 17
B Retention Samples when Customer Leaves Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
M Email Template that go to a customer and then get returned to us for RMA/Warranty Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
B FCA US Customer Specific IATF 16949- Critical Characteristics 8.6.2 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
D ISO 13485 8.2.1 and 8.2.2 - Customer Feedback and Customer Complaints ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
J Customer Complaint Response 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
V Quality review Meeting with Customer for complaints we received Customer Complaints 6
D IATF16949 - Interpretation of Customer Requirements clauses IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S Obligation to accept customer audits? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 23
D IATF16949 7.5.3.2.1 Record Retention - Our Product or Customer Product? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 1
S Customer Specific Requirements (CSR) not signed/approved IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
B FCA US IATF 16949 Customer Requirements updates Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
G Same parts but new customer - What will the auditor ask me? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
R Customer Satisfaction importance in companies with Government/Public Administration as main customer? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11

Similar threads

Top Bottom