Corrective Action vs. FMEA Occurance, Detection, Severance

A

Avogel

#1
Corrective Action vs. Occ. Det. Sev.

To set the stage, I work for a small co. We are tier 2 on the automotive pyramid.

I have a number of things to discuss, I hope I came to the right place.
I would love to pin my Root Causes to an employee. Some of my customers will take it as a root cause but most will not. For those that do they want to see mistake proofing put in place and they better not see the problem again. If it is a reoccurrence then obviously there is something wrong with the system.

However, I have a product that has been in production to the customer since 1997. There have only been a few non-conformities with this part. One in particular has occurred maybe one out of 1.5 to 2 million pcs. shipped. Not only that, but they have a very effective detection devise for this non-conformity. They will detect it, it is certain. Then there is even a question on the severity of this non-conformance. I feel as though the defect is very minor. The only way to determine this is to talk to the engineer and maybe run a few tests, but they are not entertaining that thought.

Through total investigation of this issue we found that the only way to eliminate the cause is to take the human out of the process and build a fully robotic work-cell and even then there is a chance of reoccurrence because we haven’t ruled out disgruntled employee. (If you have a mad employee out there that wants to sabotage a shipment they will find a way). The customer will not pay for the robot and will not accept a raise in product price.
Every time the customer finds this it is very expensive for us.
Are there any suggestions out there?

Another thing: Is there going to be standardization for corrective action? Some require 7 Step, some the 8D (has there been a revision to the 8D? The G8D maybe?), I am sure that there is a few more out here too.

One more: Where can I go for some poke-yoke or mistake proofing ideas?
:frust:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J
#2
First of All let me welcome you to the cove. Many have found that it is indeed the right place to be. As to your question,


You said:
"Not only that, but they have a very effective detection devise for this non-conformity. They will detect it, it is certain. "

Is there any chance you could get ahold of one of these devices? That should take care of the mistake proofing.

Just a quick thought.

James
 
A

Avogel

#3
No, it is part of their process equipment.
If this defect was present, my customer couldn't perform their testing which is done 100%.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
#4
JRKH said:

Is there any chance you could get ahold of one of these devices? That should take care of the mistake proofing.
That would be my thought. If they have something that will detect it, what is it and how much does it cost?
 
J
#5
Avogel

It sounds to me as though you have sorted through the problem as well as can be expected. I would suggest that it is time to sit down with the customer an put the cards on the table. You already have a process approaching six sigma, and the cost of improving the process further may simply not be cost effective. Ask the customer to visit you and review the process. How would they recommend mistake proofing? Would they be willing to purchase/build a piece of testing equipment? (that way it is their tooling, not yours)

If they continue to be stubborn about the whole thing, you may just have to refuse to renew the contract. Based on your post, I would bet that they would have a hard time beating your quality, so it might just get their attention.

James
 
A

Avogel

#6
Thanks for the responce JRKH & Marc.
I have setup a meeting with the customer to discuss the issue.
Any ideas on the other two items?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ashok sunder Is it possible to reduce FMEA Occurrence and Detection Ranking after corrective action taken for customer complaints? FMEA and Control Plans 6
M FMEA Corrective Action target date changed ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
H Corrective Action: When to update the Process FMEA (PFMEA) FMEA and Control Plans 15
R Updated Process FMEA: How much detail? Closure of an External Corrective Action FMEA and Control Plans 3
S Process FMEA (PFMEA) RPN Corrective Action Plan FMEA and Control Plans 6
S FMEA RPN Corrective Action Plan QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
T Measuring Corrective Action Effectiveness AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
T Corrective Action vs. Countermeasure AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
L Globalization of corrective action and follow up IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
H Can Non-conforming outputs & Non-conformity & Corrective Action procedures be merged Nonconformance and Corrective Action 8
M Root Cause and Corrective Action for CAPA's lacking validation/verification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 19
H Ever given an Operations Manager an internal Corrective Action Request? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
B Human error corrective action 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
G Use of Supplier's Corrective Action Form vs. Corporate Form Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4
M Corrective action for a defect from customer's mistaken Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
Q Corrective action ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
H Streamlining audit response and corrective action processes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
Q Corrective Action Notification - Registration Audit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
S I need help in corrective action plan Nonconformance and Corrective Action 15
B NADCAP Rejection Response to Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action. Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
T Continual Improvement as Result of Corrective Action? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 32
3 Non-conformance Register vs Corrective Action Register ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
A Corrective Action Training ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
R Not every INCIDENT report will lead to a corrective action EU Medical Device Regulations 7
L Separate Corrective Action and Preventive Action Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
T AS9100D Clause 10.2.1g Supplier Corrective Action for each and every nonconformity? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
R Non conformance (NC) or Corrective & Preventive action (CAPA) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 7
D Corrective Action Timing - IATF CB Deadline IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
R AS 9100D - Containment and Corrective action AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
P Customer Corrective Action Requests in OASIS? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
C Corrective action for failure in documents control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
G Assignable cause/corrective action list for SPC Software Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
S Can we provide training plan as corrective action for IATF 16949 Non conformity? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
P Corrective Action Response for Missed bumps on brake press Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
B Stakeholder Initiated Corrective and Preventive Action Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
B Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) A Key Process of the Quality Management System Dec 17... Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
I When exactly can a corrective action be closed? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
L What to do if a Corrective Action requires several extensions Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
qualprod Best criteria to measure Corrective Action effectiveness - Poor Maintenance ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
Ashok sunder Is it possible to reduce Risk likelihood and impact Post control Ranking after corrective action taken for risk? FMEA and Control Plans 1
E CAR (Corrective Action Report) with questionable Root Cause ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
B How to reply NCR on ineffectiveness of corrective action during IATF external audit? This is repeated issue whereby some mistake was done. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
I AS9100D Non-conformance for 10.2.1 b 2 and 10.2.1. b 3 e and f - Corrective Action AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
I Corrective Action Tracking for Product and Process in the same system? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R CIP (Corrective Action) requirements - ISO 9001 clause 10.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
E CAR (Corrective Action Request) Due Dates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
E Corrective Action or Customer Complaint ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
J If Corrective and Preventive Action were truly Effective IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
qualprod Is a Corrective Action Expected if a Quality Objective is not in compliance? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 38
M Corrective Action Effectiveness Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom