Corrective/Preventive Action response time - best practices?

M

mdoody

#1
This is my first post to the Cove. If this question has been asked before, please bear with me. In the company that I work for, a Corrective Action was issued by an internal auditor in December of 03 for a company Procedure that was not being followed. The CAR was responded to in Feb. 04 that corrective action would be implemented in March 04. For various reasons (resources, commitment) the corrective action has not been implemented as of this date!
I have 2 questions: 1) What do Registrars consider a reasonable time frame for CAR implementation? 2) What are the best practices (time-wise) for CAR implementation?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
B

Bill Pflanz

#2
mdoody said:
This is my first post to the Cove. If this question has been asked before, please bear with me.
I see you registered last year but welcome to the Cove as a poster.

mdoody said:
1) What do Registrars consider a reasonable time frame for CAR implementation? 2) What are the best practices (time-wise) for CAR implementation?
A reasonable time plan is determined by the type of problem, how much time is needed to evaluate causes and solutions and how much time to implement. You original corrective action plan was probably acceptable but it is 8 months later and it was never implemented. If anything, the registrar would write a nonconformance for the lack of completion of the CAR. If you had valid reasons to delay the implementation than the change in the CAR plan should be documented and approved by management. Lack of resources and commitment would probably not be accepted as a valid reason since management has the responsibility to provide both.

Best practices would probably include a management review of the problem and a determination of what it would take to correct it. If the problem required a shutdown, captial expenditures, different supplier etc. than the time could be months. If it is an easy fix, less than a month would be appropriate. I would think your auditor would want to see all CARs closed out by the next scheduled audit unless there are valid special reasons such as described above.

Bill Pflanz
 
M

michelle8075

#3
We just used the time frame set out by our registrar and implmented their requirments into out entire corrective/preventive action and intenal audit procedures. The practice that we empoly at my company is that the Corrective Action response is due within 15 days of that manager receiving the nonconformance. Then, the manager is responsible for implmentation of thier corrective action response 30 days after the corrective action response was received. Effectivness audit takes place 30-60 days after implmentation of the corrective action.

I had a very similar problem in my organization where I don't receive the corrective action responses, corrective action implementation or evidence of effectivness in a timely manner. An 3rd party auditor can site you for "Lack of Management Committment" if this becomes an ongoing problem.
 
C

Carl Keller

#4
We use a mechanism to "escalate" the lack of response.


It goes something like:

Past due elevate to department manager
30 days past due elevate to department director
60 days past due elevate to company VP

Etc.

Carl-
 
B

Bill Pflanz

#5
Michelle's time frame seems reasonable. One thing that should be noted. If you add the time frames into your audit procedures as specifically as Michelle has then you will be required to meet those standards. You may want to include what the process is to extend the time line when it is not practical to meet those standards. This addition must be done carefully since there is always someone who tries to circumvent the process by always asking for an extension.

Bill Pflanz
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#6
I like Carl's policy of escalating the issue if no progress appears to be forthcoming.

My policy has always been to "negotiate" a preliminary time frame in which the "owner" of the CAR has to respond with a definite time frame and plan for completion. (This meant every CAR could have a different time frame, depending on the nature of the nonconformity.) We put it into a tickler file and review the issue if it has not been resolved within the agreed time frame. In most of my employment, I have been the court of last resort, so I had no process for escalating the issue, but it certainly makes sense to me.

In practical terms, if I didn't get a response with a definite time frame within the preliminary due date, "review the issue" meant I went and stood over the person until I got the new date AND a plan for meeting that date or until the person packed and left the premises. CARs represent money and the life of the organization. I didn't request them willy nilly, but when I did, they were as serious as a heart attack. I absolutely did not allow ignoring a CAR. I did allow "postponing" with adequate reason and a plan for completion.
If I had a CAR unresolved for 4 weeks, we would have shut down the entire operation until we resolved it or found a reason to drop the issue in favor of asking to be relieved of our contract with the customer because we were unable to solve the problem and still make money. If anything had gone on for eight months, I would have been fired by the Board of Directors.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#7
mdoody said:
This is my first post to the Cove. If this question has been asked before, please bear with me. In the company that I work for, a Corrective Action was issued by an internal auditor in December of 03 for a company Procedure that was not being followed. The CAR was responded to in Feb. 04 that corrective action would be implemented in March 04. For various reasons (resources, commitment) the corrective action has not been implemented as of this date!
I have 2 questions: 1) What do Registrars consider a reasonable time frame for CAR implementation? 2) What are the best practices (time-wise) for CAR implementation?
You have got lots of sound advice already. Registrars should not have a preconceived notion of timeframes because the severity of the issue will impact the organization's ability to resolve it. However, delinquent corrective action implementation is an endemic problem that affects many, many organizations.

I would just like to point out the two primary ISO 9001:2000 requirements that address this issue. On
5.6.2 Review input
The input to management review shall include information on
a) results of audits, b) customer feedback, c) process performance and product conformity, d) status of preventive and corrective actions, e) follow-up actions from previous management reviews, f) changes that could affect the quality management system, and g) recommendations for improvement.

and on 8.2.2 for CAR's triggered from the internal audit process, which, obviously, is not the only source for internal CAR's

8.2.2 Internal audit
The management responsible for the area being audited shall ensure that actions are taken without undue delay to eliminate detected nonconformities and their causes. Follow-up activities shall include the verification of the actions taken and the reporting of verification results (see 8.5.2).

Sure, we can debate what is "undue delay" or timely. But, like Wes mentioned, without sound justification for delay of the CA implementation, management should be questionning really hard the seriousness of the people working there.


 
Last edited:
M

michelle8075

#8
Bill Pflanz said:
Michelle's time frame seems reasonable. One thing that should be noted. If you add the time frames into your audit procedures as specifically as Michelle has then you will be required to meet those standards. You may want to include what the process is to extend the time line when it is not practical to meet those standards. This addition must be done carefully since there is always someone who tries to circumvent the process by always asking for an extension.

Bill Pflanz
Bill, you are right, and I forgot to leave that part out. We do say "approximatly" 15 days (approimatly being a Quality "bad word", but we haven't had an auditor who had a problem with that yet). We also have in our system that if it is not answered in approx. 15 days, we send a reminder out to that manager (which they can send us an e-mail to extend the due dates and list the reasons), QA then reviews and approved/denies the request for an extension (this way it is in writing!). Then when we get no response, it escaltes to our Quality Steering Committee, etc. :mg:
 
G

GoKats78

#9
Unfortunately, our company has instituted a procedure that allows for the extension of due dates of Corrective Action. Guess what has resulted. Nowwe have a process that allows for CA to go on and on - as long as the extension is approved. I'm still waiting for an extension to be denied!
Corrective Actions are manged by extending due dates - as CA's that are "Late" are a big no-no! So instead of actually doing something about the problem - we just push out the due date! We have some CA's that are over a year old and have 10 or 12 extensions!
This is a Audit-Finding just waiting to be found by our registrar. :bonk: :bonk:
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#10
GoKats78 said:
This is a Audit-Finding just waiting to be found by our registrar. bonk.gif bonk.gif
I hope they do, and by doing so and writing it up as an innefective CA process, they would be doing your organization a BIG service.

Typical example of a process that has no teeth and, very likely, gets abused.

But you should not wait for your external auditor to write this up. You should initiate the change to the process from within.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L Separate Corrective Action and Preventive Action Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
R Non conformance (NC) or Corrective & Preventive action (CAPA) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 7
B Stakeholder Initiated Corrective and Preventive Action Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
B Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) A Key Process of the Quality Management System Dec 17... Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
J If Corrective and Preventive Action were truly Effective IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
K CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) - ISO 13485 Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
J Software and Methods for Tracking CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) items US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
A Preventive Action or Corrective Action - Paper cuts Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
M Corrective and Preventive Action - Prevent Recurrence is not Preventive Action? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 24
K Definition Correction, Corrective Action and Preventive Action - Definition of terms Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 28
F Software recommendations for corrective and preventive action Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 2
K Corrective and preventive action for Non Conformance on PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 30
W Compliance to 8.5.2 Corrective action 8.5.3 Preventive action ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
T Corrective Action and Preventive Action in a Holding Company Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6
M What is Preventive Action taken as part of a Corrective Action? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
C The prudence of combining non-conformance reports with corrective/preventive action Nonconformance and Corrective Action 10
N Corrective and Preventive Action in 8D Problem Solving Nonconformance and Corrective Action 21
D CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Flow Chart example wanted Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 3
J Can Corrective Action be the same as Preventive Action? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 33
sagai Preventive Action vs. Corrective Action as defined by 21CFR820 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 10
C Nonconformance, Corrective and Preventive Action Procedure(s)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Q Recommendations for criteria on creating a CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
L How to deal with too many CARs (Corrective Action Requests), PARs (Preventive Action) Nonconformance and Corrective Action 25
N Combining both Corrective Action and Preventive action procedures into one SOP Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
sagai Should Corrective Action be segregated from Preventive Action? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
B Electronic Corrective/Preventive Action Report for our Customer Service Department Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
B Corrective and Preventive Action Procedure for Customer Service Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
Q Recover a Damaged CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Project Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 6
P FDA Part 820 Clause 820.100 Corrective and Preventive Action 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
C Corrective Action and Preventive Action for Operator Error (Cosmetic - Handling) Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 15
B Questions regarding Non-Conformance, Corrective Action and Preventive Action ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
E CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Plan Templates Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
M CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Standards & Templates for Tier 1 Supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
kedarg6500 Horizontal Deployment of Corrective Action - is it Preventive Action? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 21
W Are CAPAs (Corrective Action Preventive Action) Input or Outputs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Q CAPA (Corrective Action and Preventive Action) after Correction always? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 10
Q CAPA (Corrective Action Preventive Action) NC recommended for IT, HR, ACC.? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
Icy Mountain Continual Improvement, Preventive Action and Corrective Action Database Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 23
Q Calibration Failure - CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
P When is an issue a CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) request? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6
C FDA - CAPA (Corrective Action and Preventive Action) & Complaint Database 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
T Suggestions for a CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Software Program Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 17
Q CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Guidance Needed 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
P Issue Tracking and CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Management Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6
N Nonconformance and Corrective Actions vs. Preventive Action - Problem Supplier Nonconformance and Corrective Action 24
A When to take Corrective / Preventive Action and Continuous Improvements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Q Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA), 820.100 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
W Corrective Action, not Preventive Action? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 10
V CAR (Corrective Action Request) vs. PAR (Preventive Action Request) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
D CAPA (Corrective Preventive Action) Form for critique ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8

Similar threads

Top Bottom