$1000.00? That's a bit on the high side, more than it was estimated in my group.
Why do you say that? Is it because it's a shockingly high number? Or it didn't agree with your feelings about where it should be?
If you consider what the person should be doing, which doesn't get done, while they are processing a corrective action, then it doesn't look so unworldly.
If you consider what the person should be doing, which doesn't get done, while they are processing a corrective action, then it doesn't look so unworldly.
Next, it's not a good idea to be pulling numbers like $1000 out of one's pocket. If such a thing were questioned, I doubt that "A guy on the Internet said it" would be accepted as justification.
The whole thing is a very touchy area, and there are landmines in it that need to be avoided. Unless some activity is actually subtracting from the bottom line somehow, and that negative value can be reasonably calculated, it shouldn't be assumed as a "cost." Someone spending time filling out a form doesn't always equate to lost productivity in a general sense, and as I suggested, if it results in something good happening (problems being solved) it's not a liability at all.
If anyone does start adding up these phantom "costs" and presents them to management, she had better be prepared to justify them as liabilities, otherwise the "demise" of her credibility is possible.