Counterfeit parts prevention - Audit Nonconformance - AS9100 8.2.2

Kirby

Involved In Discussions
#1
I hope this is the correct way to submit this question for discussion.
In our first AS9100 surveillance audit we were given a minor NC written against 8.2.2 c. / d. regarding counterfeit parts prevention. Auditor's comment:

"The Organization's Management Confirms that an accepted Customer Purchase Order includes a Requirement for the Organization to "establish and maintain a Counterfeit Parts Prevention and Control Plan using Industry Standard AS6174 as guidance", but that the Organization lacks awareness as to requirements included in SAE AS6174.”

Our management team has determined that our response should be to submit a Counterfeit Parts Prevention and Control Plan using Industry Standard AS6174 as guidance and perhaps, as a supporting action, revise some verbiage in our Customer Related Processes to speak to our RFQ / contract review.

I initially agreed but as I re-read the comment I'm beginning to believe that the lack of a counterfeit control plan is just a result of weak contract review and that the proper response would be to put our emphasis on the Customer Related Processes (where we address customer requirements). Of course we need a control plan but is this really a part of our corrective action for this finding?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Kirby

Involved In Discussions
#3
We reference counterfeit parts in our Control of Nonconforming Outputs procedure and we had conducted counterfeit detection training that, as it turns out, is aligned with AS6174 (to be honest we didn't realize it at the time, the training was "benchmarked" from another customer) but we do not have procedure / work instruction that addresses all of the requirements / guidance of AS6174 as our customer requires.
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
Hi, Kirby -

We received a nonconformance from a customer auditor because we did not have a documented counterfeit part procedure. Then we had another customer audit a few months later, and he wrote a nonconformance because we only referenced AS6174, not AS5553 also, lol. We don't make parts, we make tooling and ground support equipment, so our procedure wouldn't fit most organizations, but maybe it will give you some ideas.
 

Attachments

Kirby

Involved In Discussions
#7
Thanks to everyone for your observations and input.

- Al Rosen - Yes, we do understand that a control plan is in order, at the risk of really showing my ignorance, is "Control Plan" a specific document type as used in this context? Years ago I worked in an automotive system and we were required to develop process control plans for customer approval, as I recall there was a specific format defined by SAE (or some other group, maybe it was the organization's or customers' format?).

- Golfman25 - This particular customer states "...using Industry Standard AS6174 as guidance ... " for development of a control plan. I'm not trying to manipulate words, but I think that may afford some latitude in the content of the documented plan, as opposed to "...in accordance with..." which would require strict adherence?

- Cari Spears - Thanks for the example. We may use it as a baseline for our document, at least it may shed some light on the question that I asked Al Rosen, this is your "Control Plan" written as a procedure?. I must tell you, it's a small world, our company includes your company in our customer base!

The original post was directed more towards the proper response (CA) for the finding. It seems like you folks are indicating that the response should include the Counterfeit Control Plan, I'll plan to do that, but shouldn't the root cause be more like "Ineffective customer requirements review" (I think this is supported by the auditor citing 8.2.2 rather than 8.1.4? I realize that the RC that I mentioned above may be just restating the finding but I'm not sure what to add unless I try to attribute it to our AS9100 QMS being relatively new so we're still learning and improving, and then CA would include training to 8.2?

Once again, your input is sincerely appreciated, I'll never cease to be amazed (and grateful) for the giving and sharing of the Quality community.
 

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
Hi, Kirby -

We received a nonconformance from a customer auditor because we did not have a documented counterfeit part procedure. Then we had another customer audit a few months later, and he wrote a nonconformance because we only referenced AS6174, not AS5553 also, lol. We don't make parts, we make tooling and ground support equipment, so our procedure wouldn't fit most organizations, but maybe it will give you some ideas.
Cari, If you don't purchase EEE parts AS5553 is not applicable.
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
Oh, I know - that's why I didn't list it in the reference documents when I first wrote it for the other customer's finding. I argued "gently" that it wasn't applicable, but he insisted, and just adding it to the referenced documents made him happy :rolleyes::rolleyes:. (Which just goes to show that there wasn't any kind of risk - I didn't make any changes to the actual process.)
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
Kirby -

We do not create a specific plan for each product. The procedure is what we do for all work. Again - we make tooling and ground support equipment. If you are producing fly away parts or working at a repair station or something, your requirements will be a lot different.

Your customer requirement says "Counterfeit Parts Prevention and Control Plan" - does that mean a general company plan to prevent counterfeit parts and control them if you find them? Or does it mean a control plan per job or part number or whatever? What does your company make?

And I do agree with you that you should direct your main root cause on reviewing customer requirements. Creating your plan for counterfeit parts and acquiring and becoming familiar with AS6174 is just part of the immediate correction. I'd review all customer requirements for any others that aren't currently being met, then change your contract review process - or whatever your process is called - to include a review to ensure those requirements haven't changed since the last contract.
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A AS9100D 8.1.4 Prevention of Counterfeit Parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
O Identifying KPI for AS9100 8.1.4 - Prevention of Counterfeit Parts - PCB assembly contract manufacturer AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 16
A AS9100 D Counterfeit Prevention Program - We just service parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 17
P Developing a Counterfeit Parts Prevention Program AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
J AS9100 Cl. 8.7 - Control of Nonconforming Outputs - Counterfeit Parts AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
L Sources for Searching Old Electronic Parts Specs (Counterfeit Inspection) Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 3
Y Counterfeit Parts - AS9100 D Cl. 8.1.4 - Can I claim no applicability? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
C Customer Requirement to Detect and Preclude use of Counterfeit & Used Parts Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
D Counterfeit Parts and Materials Programs Requirements Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 7
5 Counterfeit Parts Mitigation Plan/Procedure Details Requirement(s) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
Marc Counterfeit Parts - Neil Felahy Sentenced to 20 Months in Prison World News 4
B Does anyone know when AS6081 (Counterfeit Electronic Parts) will be released? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
B AS9102 - 3D printing a special tool required for assembly (counterfeit risk?) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 12
A AS5553B Counterfeit Prevention - Traceability requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
A AS9100 Rev D - Procedure for Product Safety & Control of Counterfeit Part (Format) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
C How to Identify Counterfeit Medications (drugs)? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
T Implementing a Suspect Counterfeit Identification Program Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 3
WCHorn Counterfeit Avoidance Program - AS6174 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 17
R ERAI - Counterfeit Component Database (Listed on page 39 of AS5553A) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
R IPC Counterfeit Components Identification Training DVD-166C Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
W Chinese Distributor Making Counterfeit Products - Class I sterile products China Medical Device Regulations 2
A Raytheon Q note WE on Contracts - Counterfeit Material Avoidance Procedure AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
AnaMariaVR2 Drug Quality and Counterfeit Drugs in Nigeria & Handheld Spectrometers US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
S $15.9 Million in Counterfeit Microchips Sold World News 10
T How to ensure that counterfeit goods do not enter into our supply chain? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 15
Y Finding counterfeit coins Brain Teasers and Puzzles 5
R Flammability requirements for applied parts as per 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
K Initial capability studies on similar parts APQP and PPAP 7
Evelyn7E The fastest way to get supplier to ship good parts to you Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 10
B Cl. 9.2 - Moving parts - Applicable only to machinery? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
B How to test operator to see if they can catch the defective parts? Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
P Interchangeable/alternative parts in BOM (medical device) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
T Is handling chemically treated parts safe? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 18
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
aleexander Grounding of metallic accessible parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K 10 parts, 4 operators, 3 replications and each part has 3 location to measure. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
K Unused Service Parts in Newly Manufactured Medical Device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
M MSA angle issue - Nylon parts using Aberlink 3D Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
I What revalidation is necessary if we change parts in a WFI loop ? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
Fjalar Spare parts for discontinued MDD compliant class I medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S For Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) Is 100% Inspection Required? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 2
S Defibrillator Protection applicability When using Multiple applied parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
F Recording Nonconforming Purchased Parts Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
D Suggestions for Ishikawa for hyperdetailed customer - plastic molding automotive parts Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
R Is a FAIR required on parts that we design? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
C Packaging Long Parts Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
D Separation of F-type applied part and remaining parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
John C. Abnet VDA 6.3 - Question 7.3 - "blocking of parts" VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 6
I When is necessary to have RoHS declaration on non-electrical parts? REACH and RoHS Conversations 1
Z Rapid audit template for plastic parts manufacturing process Manufacturing and Related Processes 12

Similar threads

Top Bottom