CSR SHIPPING - Need suggestions for making SOP/WI for our shipping dept (automotive)...

ezekieltemple

Starting to get Involved
#1
We are getting written up for various shipping/labeling failures. We just lost the lead shipper (who was OK, but not great in appeasing the big automotive suppliers). Now that he is gone, we are getting more complaints and fines.

Our Quality Manager has decided the Quality Department needs to make SOP/WI to help reduce the rate of reprimands / "nonconforming shipments" (note: the parts are not nonconforming. The packing, labeling, packaging, protocol - emails/notes etc. are nonconforming...

Any help you can offer:
1) developing SOP/WI (formats, templates, resources that summarize automotive shipping requirements)?
2) other suggestions to generally improve our shipping system?


Thanks in advance...
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

try2makeit

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
We are getting written up for various shipping/labeling failures. We just lost the lead shipper (who was OK, but not great in appeasing the big automotive suppliers). Now that he is gone, we are getting more complaints and fines.

Our Quality Manager has decided the Quality Department needs to make SOP/WI to help reduce the rate of reprimands / "nonconforming shipments" (note: the parts are not nonconforming. The packing, labeling, packaging, protocol - emails/notes etc. are nonconforming...

Any help you can offer:
1) developing SOP/WI (formats, templates, resources that summarize automotive shipping requirements)?
2) other suggestions to generally improve our shipping system?


Thanks in advance...
First look at your Automotive customer shipping requirements. Do they supply containers for different parts? What is used where.
If you are establishing a shipping quantity per box/container, size of container during the PPAP phase and the Customer approved of it, that information should be available in the WI.

Any Customer specific labeling requirement and information should be addressed during the APQP/PPAP process. Any changes/deviation to the established process has to be approved by the Customer. A example of the label should be send with the PPAP so the customer can approve it.

If any of the required information doesn't get to your shipping department then you have a issue further up the chain.

It is up to your Customer service/Quality manager to make sure that the shipping department has all the information they need to do their job correctly and that the shipping process is followed as outlined in your own procedure. Perhaps the shipping personal needs to be trained again. But before I go and request a bunch of paperwork, I'd start at with the information, procedure, instruction you do have and build on that.

Good luck.
 

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#3
Pictures, pictures, pictures...pack it right, take thorough pictures of "this is right" and include them in both WI and reference cards (controlled).

Seeing "right" is 1000x better than describing right...
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#4
Good general suggestions thus far. ...but without knowing specifics of the non-conformities, it's difficult to weigh in.
For example, you say you are experiencing non-conformities with packaging & labeling. Is it sloppy packaging/labeling (in which case Ninja's suggestion of pictures, or maybe revised training would be appropriate)? Or is it the wrong packaging & labels altogether (in which case maybe its just any issue with stocking & inventory)? ...or perhaps something else altogether?

Your corrective action process should help. Has this been initiated? If so, what did the investigation turn up? Are there specific root-causes to address?
 

CCaantley

Involved In Discussions
#6
We are getting written up for various shipping/labeling failures. We just lost the lead shipper (who was OK, but not great in appeasing the big automotive suppliers). Now that he is gone, we are getting more complaints and fines.

Our Quality Manager has decided the Quality Department needs to make SOP/WI to help reduce the rate of reprimands / "nonconforming shipments" (note: the parts are not nonconforming. The packing, labeling, packaging, protocol - emails/notes etc. are nonconforming...

Any help you can offer:
1) developing SOP/WI (formats, templates, resources that summarize automotive shipping requirements)?
2) other suggestions to generally improve our shipping system?


Thanks in advance...
I talked in another post about rewriting our shipping manual last year. We got hit for 10,000 wrong parts shipped out. It wasn't automotive, but still not good. I took a template my company was using for the shipping manual, removed some unnecessary information and came up with this (See Attached)

As far as the work instructions, the shipping clerk is instructed to look at work orders that are printed out, look in the manual for the appropriate sheet, and when parts are sent back to shipping, make sure the information and picture matches. I chose to use portions of the prints whenever possible. Most of the pictures weren't turning out well.
 

Attachments

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#7
Nice job CCantley,

That should work pretty well for packing (time will tell)...

shipping (especially automotive) should also include pics of the overpack boxes as well...rules about where labels should be, what info is on the label, color coding and bar coding, etc...how many boxes per skid...lots of additional requirements in my experience.
 

ezekieltemple

Starting to get Involved
#9
Good general suggestions thus far. ...but without knowing specifics of the non-conformities, it's difficult to weigh in.
For example, you say you are experiencing non-conformities with packaging & labeling. Is it sloppy packaging/labeling (in which case Ninja's suggestion of pictures, or maybe revised training would be appropriate)? Or is it the wrong packaging & labels altogether (in which case maybe its just any issue with stocking & inventory)? ...or perhaps something else altogether?

Your corrective action process should help. Has this been initiated? If so, what did the investigation turn up? Are there specific root-causes to address?
Yes, all good suggestions...
The Quality Manager was suggested to make SOPs by the GM... The QM also did not perform Corrective Action / Root Cause analysis... Our management has what I term "shooting from the hip" meaning they do not take the time to look closely, aim/target and use their "rifle's" sites/scope to hit the problem directly and "kill" the problem...

From my few months at this company it looks like the answer is "ALL OF THE ABOVE" from Mark Meer's questioning about the root cause...

BTW - after I typed this the Quality Manager said to tell the Lab Tech "not to start the SOP project for shipping" since she was apparently stepping on toes in the shipping department. (The shipping department consists of 3 workers - one was hired a month ago, one was hired just a couple days ago and the third is simply the laborer.)

Our factory experiences fairly high turnover for employees... And we are lacking in good training / WIs etc... Ccasntley's Excel was nice to see. As well as Ninja's suggestion of "pictures, pictures, pictures...".

Thanks to all for the time and consideration.
 
#10
Our Quality Manager has decided the Quality Department needs to make SOP/WI to help
My first thought was "huh?" I'd be all over them like a rash for NOT using the RCA process and, instead, diving in with someone NOT involved in the process to write a WI! He should be looking to freshen up his resume...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
H SPC for special characteristics - CSR - Control of SC and CC Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
B Internal and external auditor competency to CSR's IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 20
M EU – Chemical Safety Report – CSR – REACH Authorisation decisions – Triton X-100 – Ortho-clinical-Use1 REACH and RoHS Conversations 0
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Interesting article form the UNIDO Magazine - CSR: a wolf in sheep’s clothing? Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 16
B IATF 16949 Cl. 4.3.2 - CSR vs Commercial Agreements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
H IATF 16949 Clause 9.2.2.2 Audit System / CSR IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
R Communication of CSR's throughout the organization and who they apply to IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
C IATF 16949:2016 New CSR (CQI´s) - Share your experience IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
R IATF requirement of Documented QMM incorporation of CSR's into the processes? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S Second Party Audit - GM IATF 16949 CSR September 2017 General Auditing Discussions 0
A CSR - How do you share them within your organization? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
C A couple CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) questions... Esp. Ford & Toyota Customer and Company Specific Requirements 5
Sean Kelley Are there Mitsubishi CSR's (Customer Specific Requirements)? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
P Nissan CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) as of 2014 - ANPQP Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
R Ford Motor Company new CSR document - May 2014 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
Stijloor Ford - June 2013 Customer Specific Requirements (CSR) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
Sean Kelley Do CSR's (Customer Specific Requirements) apply from the customer of your customer? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
P Renault CSR - Identifying the difference between an ASES and ASAS-P Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S Help with Master Thesis focusing on ISO/TS 16949 and CSR in automotive SC IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
P Revised Fiat CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
T CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) Audit Check List Customer and Company Specific Requirements 5
P CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) in TS 16949 Audits - Always required? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 27
M Are OEM requirements (CSR) applicable to Tier 2 Suppliers IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
P New Renault CSR just published on the IATF Global Oversight webpage Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
S Chrysler CSR for use with PPAP 4th ed July 2011 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
M CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) linkage to IQA process IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
somashekar Driving CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Performance down the Supply Chain Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
Q Supplier Special Process System Assessments - CSR Requirements Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
P New Fiat CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) - 26 October 2010 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 14
P New GM CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) - October 2010 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
G CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) for Volvo Customer and Company Specific Requirements 10
xfngrs TS 16949 CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) in Quality Manual? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 3
P New Chrysler CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) - June 2010 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
D Tobacco and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Imported Legacy Blogs 2
O IMDS Recommendations or CSR? Which prevails? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 7
P Delphi CSR 03.2010 (Customer Specific Requirements) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
P New Brasilian Fiat CSR? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
S How to make a Quality Assurance Plan - Volvo CSR Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 6
Sidney Vianna Ford has issued new CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) - Posted 09/16/2009 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 6
K New 8D format for TS16949 CSR (Customer Specific Requirements)? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
P Volvo Customer Specific Requirements (CSR) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
P BMW Customer Specific Requirements (CSR) - 2008 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 12
Keith Childers New Delphi CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
P Problems with Internal Process Audit integration due to different CSR IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
P New Ford and GM CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
Kales Veggie Ford has issued a new CSR dated August 2008 and CQI 9 / W-HTX checklist Customer and Company Specific Requirements 15
E Distributing CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) to Suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
P Problems with TS 16949 CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) Auditing General Auditing Discussions 3
V TS 16949 Status Report? List of CSR's? 3rd Rev. in October? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
Sidney Vianna New Ford CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) available from the IAOB website Customer and Company Specific Requirements 5
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom