J
JodiB
Customer is auditing us
We are having a supplier audit this week. They are sending three people over and are proposing to divide us into three groups to meet with them. The HSE Mgr. will meet with one person to go over HSE issues, I will meet with one person to go over QMS issues, and they want to meet with our VP Operations and Technical to discuss our operational and engineering procedures.
My question is whether the VP (who is quite competent and can answer whatever they ask although he knows jack about QMS or ISO 9001) should be talking with this person without me being there. Not because I'm on an ego trip or anything but the usual practice for a third-party audit is to have a second company representative along as a "guide". I've never been involved in a supplier audit. - Actually, this is a Potential Supplier audit.
This VP tries to cut me out of everything that (according to the other thread I started) a QM should be involved in: supplier problems, equipment failures, document control ( I find out today that he "issued" a procedure for his dept. months ago and used a project engineer in his dept. to sign the QA box !), etc. Am I being paranoid that this feels like another way of demonstrating that he operates on his own outside of the quality dept. ? Am I being practical in wanting to hear how he responds to their questions?
We are having a supplier audit this week. They are sending three people over and are proposing to divide us into three groups to meet with them. The HSE Mgr. will meet with one person to go over HSE issues, I will meet with one person to go over QMS issues, and they want to meet with our VP Operations and Technical to discuss our operational and engineering procedures.
My question is whether the VP (who is quite competent and can answer whatever they ask although he knows jack about QMS or ISO 9001) should be talking with this person without me being there. Not because I'm on an ego trip or anything but the usual practice for a third-party audit is to have a second company representative along as a "guide". I've never been involved in a supplier audit. - Actually, this is a Potential Supplier audit.
This VP tries to cut me out of everything that (according to the other thread I started) a QM should be involved in: supplier problems, equipment failures, document control ( I find out today that he "issued" a procedure for his dept. months ago and used a project engineer in his dept. to sign the QA box !), etc. Am I being paranoid that this feels like another way of demonstrating that he operates on his own outside of the quality dept. ? Am I being practical in wanting to hear how he responds to their questions?
Last edited by a moderator: