S
Scott
I have been away from the forum for awhile but need to jump back into the ISO 9000 requirements. Here I go head-first in the shallow end of the pool...
Can anyone out there remember a thread from earlier this year that discussed how a U.S. based, Japanese firm had convinced a register that they did not need a formal internal audit program? Basically, (if I remember correctly), they said that was a day-to-day management task and did not want to pay someone to conduct the audits specifically.
We are in somewhat the same situation as we are contracted to be ISO 9000 compliant but our customer, (the government), does not want the contractor conducting internal audits. They don't like ISO at all but that we might be able to work around.
At anyrate we are looking down the same path this other company went, (if possible), and would like to review that thread or hear from anyone that has had any luck in deviating from the standard ISO clauses in one way or another.
Thanks,
Scott
Can anyone out there remember a thread from earlier this year that discussed how a U.S. based, Japanese firm had convinced a register that they did not need a formal internal audit program? Basically, (if I remember correctly), they said that was a day-to-day management task and did not want to pay someone to conduct the audits specifically.
We are in somewhat the same situation as we are contracted to be ISO 9000 compliant but our customer, (the government), does not want the contractor conducting internal audits. They don't like ISO at all but that we might be able to work around.
At anyrate we are looking down the same path this other company went, (if possible), and would like to review that thread or hear from anyone that has had any luck in deviating from the standard ISO clauses in one way or another.
Thanks,
Scott