Defect Prevention - We first have to observe a defect before we can prevent?

D

Dan De Yarman

#1
Defect Prevention

What are some easy, yet effective defect prevention methods?

Don't we first have to observe a defect before we can attempt to prevent a similar one? Is it similar to the difference between corrective vs. preventive action; where corrective action is performed to correct a specific problem, and preventive action is performed on similar jobs(procedures, etc.) to prevent the problem from occurring?

Thanks for your help,

Dan
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

Dan De Yarman

#3
I've heard the term before, but I'm not sure what it is or how to use it. Could you please describe what it is and how to use it? I guess I'm still not up to speed on all the theoretical aspects of quality control/quality assurance.

Thank you Marc,

Dan
 
L

Laura M

#5
Dan,
Lot's of examples come to mind from my mmanufacturing days. Errorproofing is another term.
- If a part can be designed non-symmetrical to avoid accidentaly misassembly. (upside down or backwards - offsett locating pins)
- If not by design, then is there a feature on the part you can use to design the nest so it can only be assembled one way.
- Color coding 2 different part numbers that are similar for correct assembly, and using light detection to verify the right part. Or better yet, can the designs be reduced to one?
- Having rejects pass through a reject chute (with detection verification) before the stand will cycle again.

Haven't referenced the pdf files as yet, may be redundant...if I think of more, shall I let you know? Of course to be considered "prevention" these activities should take place before a reject is produced, but are just as useful as corrective action.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#6
ISO 9001 requires that you have procedures for identifying and eliminating the causes of actual or potential nonconformities in your products, processes, or the quality system.

Product and service nonconformance reports are the source of information leading to the corrective action that you should take to prevent the same or a similar problem from recurring. Situations may include the following:

Failures, malfunctions or nonconformities in incoming materials, processes, tools, equipment or facilities needed to produce your product or deliver your service, including the equipment and systems you use;
  • Inadequate or non-existent procedures and work instructions;
  • Non-compliance with procedures or work instructions;
  • Inadequate process control;
  • Poor scheduling;
  • Lack of training;
  • Inadequate working conditions;
  • Inadequate resources, (human or material);
  • Inherent process variability.

These conditions may be found by reviewing:
  • Inspection and test records;
  • Nonconformance reports;
  • Observations during process monitoring;
  • Audit observations;
  • Field, service, or customer complaints;
  • Regulatory authority or customer observations;
  • Observations and reports by your personnel;
  • Sub-contract problems;
  • Management review results;
  • Inherent process variability.

The same causes and conditions may indicate where preventive action is needed and where patterns or trends that may indicate the potential for nonconformities should be investigated. The degree of corrective or preventive action taken depends upon and is directly related to the risk, size and nature of the problem and its direct effects on product quality.

Corrective and preventive action reports should be part of the management review process.

Corrective action

Corrective action is taken to eliminate the cause of an existing nonconformity or other undesirable situation. There is a distinction between "correction" and "corrective action". Correction refers to repair or rework as is done to eliminate a nonconforming product situation whereas corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence of the situation.

Your procedures should describe how to implement corrective action, how it should be carried out and the effectiveness of the results verified.

It is important to implement procedures to deal with nonconformities discovered in any products that have already been delivered. You must determine whether the nonconformity is an isolated or a repetitive problem, and any actions to be taken, if necessary.

Corrective action to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity is not necessarily required every time or for isolated incidents of a minor nature, but a periodic analysis of nonconformance reports should be done to identify opportunities for process improvement.

Preventive action

It should be noted that corrective action is taken after nonconformities are identified. Preventive action is taken when a potential nonconformity is identified as a result of the analysis of records and other relevant sources of information, such as the following:
  • Statistical process control documents;
  • Customer complaints;
  • Review product, process and quality system information,
  • Risk analysis and risk assessment of products and processes.

Records relating to the product performance should be analyzed regularly, to detect trends and to identify areas of risk that may lead to nonconformities. The analyses should also determine how to prevent any identified potential problems.

Information on preventive action taken must be part of your management review to maintain and improve your quality system.

Preventive action is taken to prevent occurrence whereas corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence of a situation or nonconformity. Preventive action is not necessarily required for all the potential nonconformities you have identified, but it should be considered if there are opportunities to improve your quality management system.

From: www.isoman.com/CorAct.htm

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 27 June 2000).]
 
D

Derek

#7
The easiest defect prevention approach I have used (for mass production type manufacturing is to:
1. Record all defects part numbers, quantities and reason for defect. (You probably already record this info or similar).
2. Each month, group all the defect information by "reasons for defect" and the number of occurances. A pareto chart is the ideal. It should show what defect type occured the most.
3. Talk with all relevant people associated with the process causing the highest defect for the month, to determine the root cause. this includes engineers, operators, supervisors, subcontractors, etc. 4. Develop an implementation plan to prevent the defect problem from recurring. (This must eliminate the root cause).
5. Future months pareto charts should show a reduction in the defect.
6. You know when you are winning when the smallest reason for defects become your highest reason.
I have tried this system on chrome/gold/zinc plating lines with enourmous success.
 

barb butrym

Quite Involved in Discussions
#9
here is a poke yoke example from real life


Those little white plastic tripods that sit in the middle of the take out pizza to keep the box from collapsing......and messing up the cheese.
 
P

Proof Reader

#10
Another practical example would be your shoes. It is shaped in such a way that you'll have to insert your right foot in the right pair and the left foot in the left pair. It will be hard to do it the other way around, and it will painful to do so.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Design and Development - Defect Prevention Plan Design and Development of Products and Processes 10
S Definition Organizational Defect Prevention Plan? Definition Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 5
I Old Time Scatter diagrams for defect type and location- software Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 3
A AQL - How to count samples with defects for each defect class AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 17
J Here is my definition of Defect Mapping Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
L How to write a proper defect description in a NCR Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
Q Calculating Defect Rates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
R Software change control process and defect tracking ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
G Defect codes and process codes need to be controlled AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
C Are zero defect sampling plans relevant to AS9120B Distributor AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
M Zero Defect Sampling Plan Standards Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
Fender1 Customer specified Item Defect Corrective Action Responsibility Customer Complaints 18
R Defect Display Area for Employee Shift Change Information Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 1
L PPM Defect Rate as a Performance Metric - Are there Flaws? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 9
P Evolving Quality Levels - Expectations for Lowered Defect Levels AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 21
A Defect Rate for asking for an RMA - Company wants an RMA for every defect found Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 10
T Customer Requirement for Sorting - Visual Defect on Plastic Part IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
P Visual Defect during Validation Process Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
J Classifying Defect Reports from Business Partners US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
J Critical Defect Destructive Testing Sampling Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
A How Defect Rate Changes After Inspection Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
N New to ISO 9001 - NCR for every defect? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
optomist1 Converting Defect Rate To Capability index Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 11
D Renault Painting Defect Acceptance Criteria Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
D DPPM - Calculating the Defect Rate of a Software Test Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 9
T Probablity of correctly detecting a defect size Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
T Metal Stamping Defect--Need Help with Corrective Action Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
A Shall we raise SCAR/CAR for every defect as per our current procedure? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
M AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) for Mixed Part Defect IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
S Are P-charts for a Particular Defect or can Different Defects be counted in one? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
K Defect Reporting and Tracking Software for a Small Machine Shop Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 1
S Standard Machining Defect Codes Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
K Defect Detection for Fresh Injection Molding Solid Parts Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
R LTPD (Lot Tolerance Percent Defective) Sampling Plan with %Defect Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
1 Defect Tracking Excel Spreadsheet Template Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 2
S Measurement Error When Measuring a Defect - Scratches Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 14
S What if I find a defect after AQL (Inspection)? Pharmaceuticals AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 1
S Six sigma and defect rate (6 sigma = 3.4 PPM) Six Sigma 6
B Can Minitab 15 Chart Geometric Distributions with Very Low Defect Rates? Using Minitab Software 2
J Calculating Defect Rate or Percent of Rejection Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
D Herringbone Defect Condition in Rolled Steel Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
B Minitab Gage R&R using Defect Count per Unit Area Using Minitab Software 1
L Zoned Defect Chart - 9 zones with 12 possible defects Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
J How to understand NOTE 2 in the ISO 9000 definition of defect? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
B Customer asks me about AQL for defect types AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 2
L Typical defect ppm level for barrel surface coating process? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
A Lamination Defect in Structural Steel Plate Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A Ring Joint Gasket Defect Types and their Consequences Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 13
T Implementing Defect Logs into my existing Non-conformance procedure Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
M Root cause analysis on non-defect defect reports? Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom