Defining Processes and their Interactions - Are Flowcharts Required?

T

Toni Herrera

#1
It is my understanding that we are required to put a flowchart or process diagram (similar to the Process model at the beginning of the standard) into our Quality manual to meet the requirement of 4.2.2 C) "a description of the interaction between the processes of the quality management system" ?? IS THIS TRUE?

Or can this be achieved in text format?

In 1999, when we developed the structure of our system...(designed around our 9 major processes from Design to Shipping instead of the 20 ISO elements) we gave each process a unique number in the system for all their documents. In addition we gave supporting processes the first numbers so folks can find them faster (Section 1.0). Our quality manual explains our identified processes necessary for our QMS are defined by the structure of our system, interaction is defined in the procedures.

Now as a small comment, I just want to say that interaction is inherent to the operation of the business. The Receiving process is always operating from the Purchasing processes' output, and Accounts Payable operates on both processes outputs.

I mean does this really need to be flowed out? Do I really have to flow this out for the auditor? And what value will this document provide our quality system?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

Raptorwild

#2
Hello Toni,


(Or can this be achieved in text format?)


Yes, yes yes... A flow chart would make it easier for an auditor but text description of the interaction between the processes of the quality management system is acceptable.

Paula
:bigwave:
 
#4
A flow chart would make it easier for an auditor
While this is important, I also think a visual depiction, as in a flow chart or process map, is also useful in understanding your own processes. Most process maps I've seen, however do a less than adequate job of describing the interaction of the processes. They typically center around just the one process.

My recommendation is to use the flow chart where it helps you and to use narrative where it helps. Not only are both allowed, you can use both to supplement the other.

Great question. Keep 'em coming.
 
T

Toni Herrera

#5
Thanks!

Have either one of you seen examples of how other folks have used text to describe interactions?

I have been reading the other thread regarding 4.2.2 in TS16949, which is pretty much the same subject, but I guess my thick brain is not understanding the "why" part yet. :confused:

Regardless, of why, now I need to figure out how. Any sites you would recommend or examples of text descriptions?
 
D
#6
Toni,
If you could post some of your examples, it would be grealy appreciated! Thanks, Dawn
PS Dont be a shy browser forever!
 

MrPhish

ISOLove to Dance
#8
The Auditor Has Left the Building

I noticed the commnet "A flow chart would make it easier for an auditor". While this is true and has its importance within your QMS ... IMHO the real reason for using a flow or process type chart is to make it easy for the employees to understand the flow ... not the auditor. It's the employees who use the system on a daily basis and make the system work or fail. Designing any part of the system with the auditor as the primary target is again IMHO not the prime reason for having a QMS in the first place.

I created my flow/process chart with the ease of use by the employees the paramount design criteria. I then created a simple cross-referrence matrix (for referrence only) for the sole use of the auditor. I never even published it for anyone else. It took my auditor an extra hour to "map his brain" to my system using this mattrix, but after that everything went well. I've gotten away from letting the "power of the auditor" drive HOW my QMS is designed and HOW it evolves. I don't disreguard the auditor ... I place him in the proper context within the operation of MY QMS.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Developing Documentation and Defining Processes as Subcontractor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
R Defining Interaction of Processes in a Software Company Software Quality Assurance 3
D Defining Yield Rate Targets for different Manufacturing Processes APQP and PPAP 2
T Defining (Identifiying) Key Processes in a Company - "Key Process Master List" Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 45
S Defining Specification limits for unknown processes Six Sigma 4
W TS 16949 Implementation - Have a question on defining processes IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D Question regarding ECO process, specifically for Life Science products and defining form fit and function ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
T Defining sampling plan for different AQL AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 1
M Defining frequency of measurement tools callibration Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
M Defining and Documenting Record Retention CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
G Defining performance metrics for DFMA implementation Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
S Defining a Quality System from scratch - Preferred system and documentation names Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
A Defining Expected Service Life in Risk Management File Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 5
C Defining Approvals Required for Design Control Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
khotchandrakant Defining Acceptance Quality Level, I need clarity on AQL 1.5, 2.5, 4.0 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 5
M Defining the lifetime of orthopedic implants joints Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
C AS9100 rev D 8.5.1 c 2 - Defining the Machine in-process frequency per ANSI/ASQ Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
V Defining Safety Precautions for Category 4,5 Molecules Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
E European Regulations defining the terms Repair and Refurbish EU Medical Device Regulations 5
T Defining Major vs. Minor Changes to Procedures ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
GStough Adequately Defining Which Suppliers to Audit and Frequency Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
E Quality Techucuan (Technician) in Electronics - Defining Postion Requirements Career and Occupation Discussions 4
moritz Defining a good Scope for Critical SOPs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
T Standards for defining audible alarms/warnings for OR instruments IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M Defining Critical Vs. Non-Critical Suppliers/Service Providers (API Q1, 9th. Ed.) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
B IEC 60601-2-24 - Defining Storage Volume IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
E Defining Sub-Disciplines for Chemical Testing Laboratory Employee Proficiency Testing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
T Defining Nonconformances in a Service Organization ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
M Defining Reliability and Confidence Levels Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 3
J Defining Martial Arts and Gymnastics Statistical Techniques Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
V Defining the criteria for equipment to be qualified or requalified Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
R Need help on defining scope for Design Verification File for Class III IVD 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
J Defining CCP (Critical Control Points) in a Rice Mill Plant Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 9
S Process Map and defining KPIs Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
5 Major Nonconformance for not "clearly" defining the "device lifetime" ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
E Defining the lifetime of an Implantable Medical Device Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 5
B Defining Expected Oxygen Leakage for Safety Testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
G Defining Post Mold Cure Ramp-Down Temperature Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K Audit Nonconformity on Defining 'Outsourced' Infrastructure Maintenance Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 21
G Points to consider while defining the Quality Policy AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
G Defining Quality Objectives for Product Realization and Design and Development AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
C Defining ISO 9001:2008 Scope for a Sterilization Company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S Defining Skilled vs. Semi-Skilled vs. Unskilled Labor Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
I Defining the scope for ISO 9001 Registration - Software, Hardware and Customer Care ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Product Specification vs. Information Defining Product - The differences? 7.3.3.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
N Where to begin defining and monitoring Quality Metrics in a Machine Shop Manufacturing and Related Processes 9
A Testing Process Audit - Defining a Process Compliance Mechanism Software Quality Assurance 2
R Defining the type of Applied Part - Metal Probe (Applied Part) employs Water Cooling IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
N Defining Security Interfaces for Scope for ISMS - Need help IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 10
A Defining the differences between Prototype vs. Production Guidelines? Contract Review Process 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom