Defining what is a Medical Device Accessory and what isn't - Much Confusion

M

mr.mike

#1
Hello again,

I'm having some difficulties interpreting how accessories are defined.

Perhaps it would help if I gave a quick summary of our system:
[Main Device] -> [USB Cable] -> [Computer] -> [Power Supply Adaptor]

So, I've got a couple of questions:

1) The "USB Cable", "Computer" and "Power Supply Adaptor", appear to fit the definition of "accessory" given in MDD 93/42/EEC, Article 1, Section 2(b). However, we are not technically the manufacturer of these (they are commercially available products which we've specced out and had independently tested & certified). As such, technically the manufacturers of these don't have any specific intention of them being used with our device. So I guess my question is: are these considered accessories given:
- that we (the DEVICE manufacturer) intend them to be uses with the system, but
- they (the ACCESSORIES manufacturers) have no specified intent one way or the other for these to be used in a MD system.

2) Can anyone recommend suppliers for these 3 accessories (USB, PC, Power-supply adaptor) that ARE intended for medical applications? The issue that we are having is that the suppliers of the PC and Power-Adaptor are continually changing their models, and each time, we are having to re-test and re-certify. Is there any way this can be avoided?

As always, guidance is greatly appreciated.
MM.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
T

The Specialist

#2
Re: MD Accessories: Much Confusion

Hello again,

I'm having some difficulties interpreting how accessories are defined.

Perhaps it would help if I gave a quick summary of our system:
[Main Device] -> [USB Cable] -> [Computer] -> [Power Supply Adaptor]

So, I've got a couple of questions:

1) The "USB Cable", "Computer" and "Power Supply Adaptor", appear to fit the definition of "accessory" given in MDD 93/42/EEC, Article 1, Section 2(b). However, we are not technically the manufacturer of these (they are commercially available products which we've specced out and had independently tested & certified). As such, technically the manufacturers of these don't have any specific intention of them being used with our device. So I guess my question is: are these considered accessories given:
- that we (the DEVICE manufacturer) intend them to be uses with the system, but
- they (the ACCESSORIES manufacturers) have no specified intent one way or the other for these to be used in a MD system.

2) Can anyone recommend suppliers for these 3 accessories (USB, PC, Power-supply adaptor) that ARE intended for medical applications? The issue that we are having is that the suppliers of the PC and Power-Adaptor are continually changing their models, and each time, we are having to re-test and re-certify. Is there any way this can be avoided?

As always, guidance is greatly appreciated.
MM.

Personally, I would not consider a PC as an 'accessory'...

I cannot see (without further interpretation of your requirements) how the manufacturer of any of the mentioned 'accessories' is of any importance beyond:

Suitability
quality
support (if required as part of a service agreement)
auditable QMS/ regulatory certifictation.

It may be possible (if concerned about product (supplied) changes) to identify like-for-like specifications for accessories.
 
M

mr.mike

#3
Re: MD Accessories: Much Confusion

Why wouldn't the PC be considered an accessory?

I guess part of my confusion stems from the vagueness of the Article 1 definitions of "medical device" and "accessory"...to me, the distinction is blurry.

For example:
- Article 1, 2(a) states a medical devices as "...any instrument, apparatus, appliance,
software, material or other article, whether used alone or in combination..." (bold added by me).
- So, while the PC alone is NOT specifically intended for the purposes listed in 2(a), in COMBINATION with our device, it is.
- Same applies to the USB cable and power-supply that we provide. They are critical to the functioning of the system (and in this sense are intended to be used in combination for MD purposes), even though alone they have no specific MD intent.

The fact is that ALL these components are critical to the system functioning for its intended purpose, whereas alone they have no medical intent.

I apologize for my confusion on what are probably pretty straight forward definitions.
The reason I want to be clear is that we need to list all accessories in our Technical File, and I want to be certain I'm listing everything relevant.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#4
I'm having some difficulties interpreting how accessories are defined.

are these considered accessories given:
- that we (the DEVICE manufacturer) intend them to be uses with the system, but
- they (the ACCESSORIES manufacturers) have no specified intent one way or the other for these to be used in a MD system.
Because you are the responsible Manufacturer of the Device, you are the determiner of what is an Accessory for the system, and you are responsible for suitability and control of that Accessory's design, manufacturing, etc.

The actual maker of the accessory, unless they happen to be a medical device maker in their own right or they make a product version for you with custom-specified features, has no responsibility for their product in regard to medical device regulatory requirements. That responsibility is all yours.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#5
Re: MD Accessories: Much Confusion

The fact is that ALL these components are critical to the system functioning for its intended purpose, whereas alone they have no medical intent.
I agree that this synopsizes the decision-basis for what should be regarded as an Accessory.
 

fcowdery

Starting to get Involved
#6
Re: MD Accessories: Much Confusion

Hypothetical Situation: An OR Table has a number of options available such as drain pan or head rest, however in the absence of these options, the base intended use of the OR Table is not altered. these options only enhanced the peformance of the table and do not alter its original intended use.
Would it be appropriate to classify these items as Options or Accessories.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#7
I regard this area as not being clearly defined by the MDD.

I use the following analysis, and regard it as justifiable under the current rules:

Status of a product depends on that product's marketing.

If a minor product is sometimes sold by itself...even if it's only intended to be used in conjunction with a major product...the minor product is either a device or an accessory.

If a minor product is only made available as an element of a major product, and isn't sold separately, then the minor product can be defined as an option.

Lots of "options" of this kind are made available separately, for instance when the major-product customer decides after the major-product purchase that they additionally want the capabilities provided by minor products A, B and C. In that case, my view is that A, B and C must be regarded as accessories or devices.
 

fcowdery

Starting to get Involved
#8
thank you.
That was how I interpreted this as well.
Since these "options" are useless without the main product, they are not considered viable med devs when sold separately and therefore are options and not accessories.

Thanks
 
M

MIREGMGR

#9
Since these "options" are useless without the main product, they are not considered viable med devs when sold separately and therefore are options and not accessories.
If it matters, your comment is the exact opposite of what I proposed.

If a minor product is sold separately, for any reason and irrespective of whether its clinical use is "viable", it's either a device or an accessory.

Only if the minor product is not sold seperately can it be considered an option and not an accessory or device.

The analysis depends on marketing, not on intended use.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
E Defining the lifetime of an Implantable Medical Device Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 5
S Defining Document Review and Approval responsibilities - ISO 13485 - Medical Device Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
T Defining Product Lifetime - Medical Devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
T Defining the lifetime of medical devices - long lasting parts such as bone screws. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A Defining a lower ESD test level in IEC 60601 safety test IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
J Defining staff competence - Small mechanical workshop Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 20
D Question regarding ECO process, specifically for Life Science products and defining form fit and function ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
T Defining sampling plan for different AQL AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 3
M Defining frequency of measurement tools callibration Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
M Defining and Documenting Record Retention CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
G Defining performance metrics for DFMA implementation Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
S Defining a Quality System from scratch - Preferred system and documentation names Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
A Defining Expected Service Life in Risk Management File Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 5
C Defining Approvals Required for Design Control Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K Defining Acceptance Quality Level, I need clarity on AQL 1.5, 2.5, 4.0 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 5
M Defining the lifetime of orthopedic implants joints Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
C AS9100 rev D 8.5.1 c 2 - Defining the Machine in-process frequency per ANSI/ASQ Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
V Defining Safety Precautions for Category 4,5 Molecules Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
E European Regulations defining the terms Repair and Refurbish EU Medical Device Regulations 5
T Defining Major vs. Minor Changes to Procedures ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
GStough Adequately Defining Which Suppliers to Audit and Frequency Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
E Quality Techucuan (Technician) in Electronics - Defining Postion Requirements Career and Occupation Discussions 4
moritz Defining a good Scope for Critical SOPs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
T Standards for defining audible alarms/warnings for OR instruments IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M Defining Critical Vs. Non-Critical Suppliers/Service Providers (API Q1, 9th. Ed.) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
B IEC 60601-2-24 - Defining Storage Volume IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
E Defining Sub-Disciplines for Chemical Testing Laboratory Employee Proficiency Testing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
T Defining Nonconformances in a Service Organization ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
M Defining Reliability and Confidence Levels Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 3
J Defining Martial Arts and Gymnastics Statistical Techniques Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
V Defining the criteria for equipment to be qualified or requalified Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
R Need help on defining scope for Design Verification File for Class III IVD 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
J Defining CCP (Critical Control Points) in a Rice Mill Plant Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 9
S Process Map and defining KPIs Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
5 Major Nonconformance for not "clearly" defining the "device lifetime" ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
B Defining Expected Oxygen Leakage for Safety Testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
G Defining Post Mold Cure Ramp-Down Temperature Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K Audit Nonconformity on Defining 'Outsourced' Infrastructure Maintenance Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 21
G Points to consider while defining the Quality Policy AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
G Defining Quality Objectives for Product Realization and Design and Development AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
S Developing Documentation and Defining Processes as Subcontractor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
C Defining ISO 9001:2008 Scope for a Sterilization Company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S Defining Skilled vs. Semi-Skilled vs. Unskilled Labor Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
I Defining the scope for ISO 9001 Registration - Software, Hardware and Customer Care ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Product Specification vs. Information Defining Product - The differences? 7.3.3.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
R Defining Interaction of Processes in a Software Company Software Quality Assurance 3
N Where to begin defining and monitoring Quality Metrics in a Machine Shop Manufacturing and Related Processes 9
A Testing Process Audit - Defining a Process Compliance Mechanism Software Quality Assurance 2
R Defining the type of Applied Part - Metal Probe (Applied Part) employs Water Cooling IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
N Defining Security Interfaces for Scope for ISMS - Need help IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom