Delphi 5-Why's - Is this like an 8D Of Problem Solving?

Raffy

Quite Involved in Discussions
#1
Hi!
I just recently hired to a TS16949:2002 Company, and one of the task was been given to me, is about the Delphi 5-why of Problem Solving? :( I don't have any idea, what is this really? :eek: Is this like an 8D Of Problem Solving?
Any information would be appreciated.
Thank you very much in advance.
Best regards,
Raffy
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

dokes

#4
The Delphi method appears to be a much simpler, easier to use version of the GM Drill Deep & Wide (DDW).
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#6
JSW05 said:
And both are complicated versions of "Use Common Sense."
Yep. There's a lot to be said for common sense. Too bad more OEMs don't possess even a little. Life in the automotive supply chain can be VERY stifling.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#7
Wes Bucey said:
Yep. There's a lot to be said for common sense. Too bad more OEMs don't possess even a little. Life in the automotive supply chain can be VERY stifling.
Being an OEM QE My mantra for suppliers is: Use the default requirements unless you have a better idea. I'm always open to suggestions, and more than once a supplier has protested the basic requirements and suggested what was (for that particular supplier at least) a different method that made good sense. On the flip side, I've also heard lots of whining from people who were obviously just being lazy.
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#8
JSW05 said:
Being an OEM QE My mantra for suppliers is: Use the default requirements unless you have a better idea. I'm always open to suggestions, and more than once a supplier has protested the basic requirements and suggested what was (for that particular supplier at least) a different method that made good sense.
You realize how rare that attitude is, don't you?
On the flip side, I've also heard lots of whining from people who were obviously just being lazy.
I never think of it as "lazy" - merely frustration at extra labor which is uncompensated. The fact remains many nonconformances have instantly recognizable causes (even down to the "root" level) and the formal investigation is a redundant effort. It is frustrating to be "commanded" to perform "busy work" as seen in the eyes of the supplier.

I think, as buyers, we tread on dangerous ground when we prescribe "how" a business operation of a supplier should proceed, rather than focusing on getting a conforming product or service. We buyers become "lazy" ourselves when we demand the "proof" of finding the root cause of a nonconformance be presented to us only in a manner which fits our own neat little checklists. It may seem like only a short step from demanding shipping labels fit a template to demanding the internal processes of a supplier be reported to us in a prescribed format.

If we need some sort of assurance that a supplier has cured a glitch in his process, why does it have to be on our form? There is a big difference between:
  • "Here's a suggested process which has been helpful for others."
    TO
  • "You must use this process and form or suffer any of a variety of penalties, up to, and including, cancelation of the order!"
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#9
Wes Bucey said:
You realize how rare that attitude is, don't you?
Yes, but I have an advantage in that most of my working life has been spent in job shops, and I have firsthand experience in dealing with OEM SQbots. The problem with most OEM SQEs is that they don't understand that in most job shops, the salient imperative is KEEP THE MACHINES RUNNING and that almost everything else is considered a bothersome obstacle. Once you understand this, you can deal with it.

Wes Bucey said:
I never think of it as "lazy"
Mainly because you're not as cynical as I am, although I prefer to dress it up a bit and call it pragamtism biggrin-a1.gif . I understand the frustration part of it, and I feel the pain, even now. But there is a measure of laziness out there too, especially intellectual laziness--not wanting to take the time to become better educated--better equipped--in the tools of the trade.
 

Raffy

Quite Involved in Discussions
#10
Thanks

Hi, :thanks:
Was the 5Y would really solve the problem. To date, in our end, one of our company recommend that we should use the 5Y and be integrate it in our specs. And the my department said that 5Y is very tedious and much more complicated. It takes more time to adapt. What we are using now is the 8D of Problem Solving. And now, this is Delphi, as far as I know is part of the Root Cause Analysis and not a complete package for a Problem Solving Tool. :eek: Basically. haven't try this yet. I think, I have to try this first myself....and I would be back again on this thread for the updates.
Thank you for the information that you've all provided.
Best regards,
Raffy :cool:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Q Delphi Problem Solving Survey IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
P May I combine the Process Audit and Product Audit into Delphi's LSR? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
P Delphi CSR 03.2010 (Customer Specific Requirements) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
Stijloor GM to take back 5 Delphi plants, contract details show World News 0
Q Checklist for Customer Specific Requirements (CSRs) for Delphi/Visteon/Chrysler/GM IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S GM buys Delphi steering operations World News 1
bobdoering Judge Allows Delphi To End Salaried Retiree Benefits. World News 44
K New Delphi CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
Douglas E. Purdy Delphi CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) and LPA Requirements Customer and Company Specific Requirements 10
Douglas E. Purdy Delphi CSR (Customer Specific Requirements) and LPAs (Layered Process Audit) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Marc Delphi Workers Accept Pay Cuts World News 0
Marc Delphi to close, sell most plants under deal World News 0
J Bad news for Spain. Delphi anounced yesterday the closing of Delphi Cadiz Plant World News 17
J Delphi Level Scheduling Logistics powerpoint .ppt Course Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
Marc Delphi, GM and UAW reach broad buyout deal World News 1
T Does Delphi's requirement for layered process audits only apply to their products? Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 15
Marc Delphi, GM Reach Deals With UAW on Hourly Worker Buyouts World News 1
Marc As Delphi delays, losses grow, pensions shrink, move to US$10/hr hourly wages World News 7
C Delphi latest released on CSR dated Nov 22, 2005 and again Feb 1,2006 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
Wes Bucey Delphi pulls trigger - Bankruptcy! World News 32
Marc Delphi may file for bankruptcy World News 4
Marc Lawsuit says Delphi faked sales to improve financial reports World News 0
Wes Bucey Delphi - bankruptcy strongarm tactic? World News 9
C Delphi Customer Specific Requirement (CSR) - Delphi releases their updated version Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
Q TS 16949 Certification date requirement of suppliers by Bosch, Delphi & Siemens IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Q Visteon & Delphi Customer Specific Requirements Checklist Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4
R TS-16949 and SubContract Manufacturing - Both Tier 1 & 2 to GM, FORD, Delphi, Visteon IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Howard Atkins Public Links to Delphi Supplier Requirements on the Web Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
Howard Atkins PPAP forms - Delphi PPAP excel program - Partcertall - 6.06.xls Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 3
J PPAPALL from Howard @ Delphi APQP and PPAP 2
J How to keep MDD certificate valid when legal manufacturer has liquidity problem EU Medical Device Regulations 0
normhowe "The Problem with Quality Management: Process orientation, controllability and zero-defect processes as modern myths" Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 2
M Problem with nonlinear regression Using Minitab Software 12
M Problem Solving in Fiat Automobiles Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 0
R Problem solving activity - Three hours to fix the issue Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
T Formal Q Self Assessment - Problem with assigning Product and Process Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
NDesouza Go See, Think, Do (GSTD) Problem Solving Activity Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 8
Marc Medical device vulnerability highlights problem of third-party code in IoT devices Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
P How far an operator can reach into a machine before it becomes an ergonomic problem CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
V Ammeter calibration - Measuring head (on pic.) problem General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
G Problem Resolution Report Monitoring - Customer complaint or PRR as general motors use Customer Complaints 12
S Relationship between IEC 62304 problem resolution and ISO 13485 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 8
qualprod Add new action plans in CA, while waiting effectiveness - Same problem reappears ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
bryan willemot Documenting past problem history for fasteners for AS9100 Rev D AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
Marc Problem Opening Attachments Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 4
Marc Problem with 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) sub-forum link - 2 May 2019 Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 1
K Does anyone have a copy of a GM 5 Phase Problem solving form Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 1
D Training for AS13000 - Problem Solving Requirements for Suppliers Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 14
eule del ayre Manual Inventory System - Problem is discipline of the employees Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 7
G When preventative action is prohibited by cost in 8D problem solving Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom