Randy, I was referring that the inputs to 7.3.2 a, this company use are qualitative. I know that there is no requirement asking for "Quantitative" inputs, however, inputs in a quantitative form could be best for a design that meets customer needs.
Helmut and Stijloor comments above address this topic and it appears that while auditing 7.3.2 any form that best suits the organization should be fine and no NCs could be issued, as long as the company "says what they do, and do what they say"
It appears that some companies also don't know much about D&D, other than design by experience the correct methods are not used. Add hoc?
Helmut and Stijloor comments above address this topic and it appears that while auditing 7.3.2 any form that best suits the organization should be fine and no NCs could be issued, as long as the company "says what they do, and do what they say"
It appears that some companies also don't know much about D&D, other than design by experience the correct methods are not used. Add hoc?
"say what they do, and do what they say" was overrated and simplistic 10 years ago, and is completely outdated today. Systems must be effective, not just compliant with some procedure. Many of the NCs I write are because a process was not effective, not just basic compliance.
