Design of Services - Can a Heat Treating service exclude parts of 7.3?

D

dbzman

#1
This has been discussed before but I wanted to address it one more time.

ISO9001:2000 allows exclusions for section in 7.0.

Can a Heat Treating service that provides Heat Treating to a customer exclude the following:

(A). 7.3.1 - Design and Devlopment Planning
(B). 7.3.1.1 - Multidisiplinary approach
(C). 7.3.2 - Design and development inputs
(D). 7.3.2.1 - Product design inputs
(E). 7.3.3 - Design and development outputs
(F). 7.3.3.1 - Product design outputs
(G). 7.3.4 - Design and development review
(H). 7.3.4.1 - Monitoring
(I). 7.3.5 - Design and development verification
(J). 7.3.6 - Design and development validation
(K). 7.3.6.1 - Design and development validation supplemental
(L). 7.3.6.2 - Prototype programme
(M). 7.3.7 - Control of design and development changes

Our corporate headquaters determined since we provide a service and do not sell a product then we can exclude these.

I disagree. Since the standard mentions that "wherever the term 'product occurs, it can mean 'service'", then there reasoning does not hold up.

What do you think?

dazed and Confused......

:bonk:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A

Al Dyer

#2
Maybe lack of common sense on their part, does the process affect product quality???

If so______________________

Al...
 
D

dbzman

#3
Heat Treating Process

Yes, the heat treating process is very improtant to the customer. If we did not heat treat the customers parts to their spec then the parts would not be of any use to them.

The heat treating process that we do for them (we sell our service to them) makes their product functional.

The customer sends the parts to us, we heat treat them, and send them back. We may not always know what the final product will be (usually we do) but if we do not meet the spec then the parts are useless to them.

:thanx:
 
#4
dbzman said:
Our corporate headquaters determined since we provide a service and do not sell a product then we can exclude these.

I disagree. Since the standard mentions that "wherever the term 'product occurs, it can mean 'service'", then there reasoning does not hold up.

What do you think?
I agree with your interpretation. Just one question: Is this really ISO9001:2000 we're talking about? (B, D, F, H, K & L from your list)

/Claes
 
D

dbzman

#5
Correct

You are right. I took the numbers from Corporate who are TS. The facility that it will be applied to will only be ISO and the TS additions will not be addressed.

Sorry for the confusion.....

:bonk:
 
T

Tom W

#6
As a heat treat company that is TS2 certified I can tell you that we also had these concerns. We have spent many hours / days trying to get this answer. Through our audit we "learned" that most of those you listed (which we had tried to address) were not needed (according to our registrar). It obviously may not be correct. We addressed the following:

7.3.2.2 Manufacturing Process Design Input
7.3.2.3 Special Characteristics
7.3.3.2 Manufacturing Process Design Outputs
7.3.4 - Design and development review (as it applies to process design)
7.3.4.1 - Monitoring (again as it applies to the process design)
7.3.5 - Design and development verification (per NOTE 2)
7.3.6 - Design and development validation (per NOTE 2)
7.3.6.1 - Design and development validation supplemental
7.3.6.2 - Prototype programme
7.3.7 - Control of design and development changes

We ensured that we tailored these sections to process design and our responsibilities for that.

This is what we "streamlined" it down to. Right / wrong it is what we have and we got TS. One of the hard parts is the auditors do not even know what should apply and what should not apply. They all seem to have different opinions. We decided to determine what we could and should do to satisfy the customer and what would be value-added to our business.

We discuss this also in our APQP section:
7.3.1.1 - Multidisciplinary approach

Like I said, this is only what we did. However we are constantly looking at it and seeing if there is any benefit for us to revisit these requirements (7.3) and determine if we need further implementation.
 
I

Ingeniero1

#7
IMHO, if the customer specifies the material preparation, heat rise time, hold temperature and time, cooling period, furnace atmoshere, quenching media, and all other parameters involved with heat treating, then you probably can be excluded.

However, if the customer simply specifies that a part be heat-treated to 58/60 RC, for example, and perhaps a couple of other parameters, but you still have to 'design/develop' the process, then I don't believe you can be excluded.

Again, IMO, what you are selling (your product) is the heat-treating process, and in most cases it will be 'per your specifications' to achieve certain characteristics.

Alex
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#8
Ingeniero1 said:
IMHO, if the customer specifies the material preparation, heat rise time, hold temperature and time, cooling period, furnace atmoshere, quenching media, and all other parameters involved with heat treating, then you probably can be excluded.

However, if the customer simply specifies that a part be heat-treated to 58/60 RC, for example, and perhaps a couple of other parameters, but you still have to 'design/develop' the process, then I don't believe you can be excluded.

Again, IMO, what you are selling (your product) is the heat-treating process, and in most cases it will be 'per your specifications' to achieve certain characteristics.

Alex
I think my answer to Jaco in another thread http://elsmar.com/Forums/showpost.php?p=80824&postcount=8
also covers this operation and that you are NOT design responsible.
The key point being that the customer specifies the hardness he wants for the material, regardless whether he goes into specifics of autensite and martensite characteristics. Your operation seems to fall exactly into 7.2.1 (especially 7.2.1 b):
7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product
The organization shall determine

a) requirements specified by the customer, including the requirements for delivery and post-delivery activities,
b) requirements not stated by the customer but necessary for specified or intended use, where known,
c) statutory and regulatory requirements related to the product, and
d) any additional requirements determined by the organization.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A 8.6 Release of products and services, 8.3 Design and development - evidence required ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
A Design and development of products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 Design for an education services provider ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
P Design and Development Clause ISO 9001:2015 Exclusion for Medical Services Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
Y ISO 9001 Cl. 8.3 - Design and Development of Products and Services not applicable ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
T ISO 9001:2015 - 8.3 Design and Development of Products and Services (Repair Company) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
M Question about ISO 9001:2015 8.5.3 - Design and Development of Products and Services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
J Understanding ISO9001:2015 - 8.3: Design and Development of Products and Services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
G ISO 9001:2015 8.3 Design and development of products and services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
A 2 Aspects of Services Design - Design of the Service and Design of Service Delivery Service Industry Specific Topics 2
S Taguchi's "Robust Design" for Services Sector - Experience or Papers to Share? Six Sigma 3
somashekar Design and Development Support Services Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 3
S Advisory Services - Design and Development requirements per clause 7.3 of ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
D AS9100 Design - Machine shop offering Drafting Services? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
B Design & Development of Professional Services - Consultants to manufacturing industry ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
P Design & Development in Food and Beverage Services - Permissible exclusion or not? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
K Excluding Design & Development - Small business - Consultancy Services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
J Shared Services and TS16949 question - Automotive Design Center IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
DuncanGibbons Section 8.3 relevant for design organisations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
P DFMEA - Machinery Design Best Practices FMEA and Control Plans 0
R Is a FAIR required on parts that we design? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
U API Spec Q1 - 5.6.1.2 C (3) - Design software Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 3
N Example for design and development planning,input,output,review,verification,validation and transfer Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
C Stress / Challenge Conditions for Design Verification Testing to Reduce Sample Size 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 11
J Significant change related to design and intended use EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Traceability of requirements to design and risk Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
U NOC - What is considered a "design change" EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Q PPT used as Design Review ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Design Verification Sample Size vs Repeats Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 9
A Design and development procedure for API Spec Q2 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
D Design controls - Inputs, outputs, V&V, DHF, DMR ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
LostLouie Manufacturer divorced from Design process, is he justified in design process deficiencies? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
R DFA & DFM - Examples for Design for assembly and design for manufacturability Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D ISO 13485 - 7.3.6 Design and development verification - Do most folks create a separate SOP? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
K Joint approval between OEM and Manufacturer on Design Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
M API 4F/7K/8C Design Package Validation Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
A Design History File - Not ready to share the design drawings or Bill of Material US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
W Need for current design or process control FMEA and Control Plans 2
A What is the difference between Design Process, Process Design and Design Control? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
D Test summary report example for design validation wanted - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
S Documenting Design Verification Test Results (ISO 9001) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
DuncanGibbons Understanding the applicability of Design of Experiments to the IQ OQ PQ qualification approach Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
S Requirement to Conduct New Shelf-life Testing? (re-do testing for design change) EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A Sample Agreement available for Outsourcing Medical Device Design activity? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
DuncanGibbons How is the arrangement between Design and Production organisation envisaged? EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
L Design & Development of a SERVICE Service Industry Specific Topics 13
C Documentation for items used for Design Verification 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
P Design verification driven by new equipment. How is this different than process validation? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom