Design Responsible?

M

mibusha

#1
This pattern shop does work for Ford.

Example 1) Ford calls and asks us to change the gating for a particular pattern that they use to produce crankshafts. They tell us where to move the gating, we just do what they request. We may or may not be asked to provide an updated drawing for them. If so we have our detailer make a hand drawing or an Autocad drawing from a sketch that we make of the changes.

Example 2) Ford asks us to make a new 3.8 L cylinder block core box. Again, they tell us what to do. They either send us the prints (oops, that’s a joke, we’re talking about Ford here, aren’t we?) or they reference a previous print and tell us to make it like that with so and so changes. They send their CAD data to our designer (subcontracted), he creates a tool cutter path and sends it to us for any CNC machining. We make it according to their specifications. Afterwards they may ask for a drawing and we have our detailer make a hand drawing or an Autocad drawing for them.

In both of these examples we do not make any design decisions. IMHO we still must have FMEAs, control plans and R&M planning (we’re TE) but we are not considered design responsible.

Seeking other opinions.

Michael
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
M

mibusha

#3
In the beginning...Ford supplied them and still have ownership. But they have been modified so much over the years there is little resemblence to the originals. We just change this and that, according to their whims (gating size, screen locations, etc.), and then add it to their drawing(s). They actually do not have any updated copies. If our facility burned down... !
 
B

Batman

#4
You did not design the 3.8L cylinder block box, so you do not own the design. Therefore you are not design responsible. The standard question is who designed the product. The other standard question is whose name is one the drawing - the drawing from which the cost estimate was made.

Generally speaking, companies that are design responsible want to create something that does not exist now, and study the market to see if and how successfully it will sell. Then they draw / design it and verify the design, then market it.

I think in this case you are just being a good supplier, by granting your customer's wishes.

I think though you may want to look at your document control?
 
M

mibusha

#5
A related question would be regarding the process of manufacturing the pattern. Though Ford supplies the data and drawings. They do not tell us how to actually process the job. Would we not be responsible for designing the manufacturing process? Or is this covered by FMEAs, Control Plans and R&M planning?
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
#6
Originally posted by mibusha:

Would we not be responsible for designing the manufacturing process? Or is this covered by FMEAs, Control Plans and R&M planning?
They are technically responsible for the design FMEA. You are responsible for the process FMEA, control plan, flow diagram and other manufacturing related documentation.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K Process FMEA responsible For "Make to Design Parts" (Inhouse or Suppliers ?) FMEA and Control Plans 3
K Does company who manufacture but does not design or carry out clinical trials is responsible for CE marking for single use medical devices? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
C Advice on becoming a AS9100 Auditor - Need to audit organizations that are Design Responsible AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 12
J Not Design Responsible - Can we exclude all or parts of AS9100 clause 8.3 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
M Design & Development - Only 1 Engineer - Who is responsible for Approval? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Q Definition Design Responsible - Good Definition in the context of AS 9100 Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 2
A Design History File Maintenance - Who is responsible for the Design History File 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
C Configuration Management requirements if this facility is not design responsible AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
A Is a Distributor responsible for Design History Files 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 10
J Scope of Registration ? Design Responsible ? Outsource Design??? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M IMDS Submissions for multiple parts requested, but not Design Responsible IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
C Design Responsible - Determining if Organization is Design Responsible Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
M Design Improvement, but not OEM or Design Responsible Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
D Quality Plan - Necessary for any Order? Mature Processes & Not Design Responsible Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
Z Suppliers: "Design Responsible", "Manufacturing" and "Service Suppliers" Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
T Design responsible? Tier 2 / 3 manufacturer of steel products - TS 16949 Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
S Seeking Internal Audit Plan - Design Responsible Manufacturing company Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
J More Design Questions - Parent Company Design Responsible Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
B TS 16949 for R&D Design Centre - What part are we responsible for? Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
T Not responsible for product design - Exactly which parts of 7.3 do not apply? Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
B My company makes product to order - Are we design responsible? Exclude 7.3? Design and Development of Products and Processes 17
R Design Responsible Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
B DESIGN RESPONSIBLE? Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
M Risk-based approach to Test Method Validation for Design Verification? US Medical Device Regulations 4
S Is design and development clause 8.3 applicable for laboratory ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
K Design: Verification Vs Validation And Validation Vs Transfer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 19
L To control the essential design outputs Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
C MD Design and development procedure ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
B Validation of design for valve api 6d 25 edition ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 0
B Hi , everyone i need a procedure for validation of design prototype api 6d (valve manufacturing) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
K Exclusion of 8.3 Design and Development for Design Companies ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
J Recognised/reputable courses for ISO 13485 Section 7.3 (Design & Development)? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J Design/Development. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
O Regarding design and development requirements for a medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 6
W Rights of Supplier in Design & Build WP Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
K ISO 13485 Design Requirement with respect to "component" manufacturers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
rob3027 ISO 13485 justification for design and development exclusion for medical packaging ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
K What constitutes design under 9001? Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
P Product Requirements Control during Design Changes Design and Development of Products and Processes 4
B Minitab factorial design regression equation center point term Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
J Design Input Verification 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
P Self Certified Class 1 MDR 2017/745 Design Change CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
N Design V&V courses Career and Occupation Discussions 11
B AS9100 Design Authority questions AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
K CE design Certificate EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M ISO 13485 consultants and auditors with design oriented focus ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
T Design Transfer & use of "prototype" components in production devices. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
Q What are Quality Requirements for Design? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 8
G Mfr. Process Validation BEFORE Design Transfer? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
B Use of Statistical Techniques in Design Verification Design and Development of Products and Processes 18

Similar threads

Top Bottom