B
BBill
Hi everybody,
This is my first post but I have been reading many of the threads that pertain to the ISO 17025 standard over the last few days. However, I haven’t been able to find an answer to my questions. So, here is the deal.
My boss has asked me to design a small test part to be used for testing operator proficiency at using CMMs. The idea is to include specific features into the test part which would expose operator’s basic lack of knowledge.
That way, just by looking at the measured data, one would be able to assess whether the measurement errors (if there were any) were the operator’s fault of due to an un-calibrated machine. So my question is; What kind of features could be incorporated into the part which would test the operator’s proficiency and would allow the person assessing the operator to identify what the operator did wrong just by looking at the raw data.
Any help or ideas will be greatly appreciated on this one!
Thanks in advance.
Bill
This is my first post but I have been reading many of the threads that pertain to the ISO 17025 standard over the last few days. However, I haven’t been able to find an answer to my questions. So, here is the deal.
My boss has asked me to design a small test part to be used for testing operator proficiency at using CMMs. The idea is to include specific features into the test part which would expose operator’s basic lack of knowledge.
That way, just by looking at the measured data, one would be able to assess whether the measurement errors (if there were any) were the operator’s fault of due to an un-calibrated machine. So my question is; What kind of features could be incorporated into the part which would test the operator’s proficiency and would allow the person assessing the operator to identify what the operator did wrong just by looking at the raw data.
Any help or ideas will be greatly appreciated on this one!
Thanks in advance.
Bill