Destructive Testing GR&R (Gage R&R) - Track tester - JMP Program

B

Bookworm

#1
First and foremost, please bear with me since I am new to Gage R&R testing :eek:

I'm trying to run a GR&R test for a track tester. Basically the machine is programmed to push a device in a pre-fabricated track and record its force measurements over a programmed distance. Once a test is run once, the testing material will get deformed, so running the same material through the tester again would give different force measurements. :(
Since this is a destructive test, do I calculate values like the % Gage R&R in the same manor as I would a non-destructive test? Do I have to actually find a way to change my testing procedure to make it non-destructive? Any ideas?
Also, I'm using the JMP program which asks me to enter a tolerance value (USL-LSL), and I'm not really sure what value I should enter into here, but I know what I enter here has a dramatic effect on my % Gage R&R value.We have no set tolerances or standard devices to use as reference since this is a first round series of tests. Is it then up to the engineers best educated guess on this tolerance value?
:frust:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#2
The MSA manual 3rd edition has a section (Chapter IV - Section A & C) that deals with destructive testing.

You can also perform a nested gage R&R.

There are two basic approaches to obtaining the necessary repeat measurements. One is to collect the test specimens, and sub-divide them into smaller samples if possible. This would work for chemical testing and similar needs. The second approach is to use consecutive homogeneous parts from a single lot for the repeats, and parts from different lots for the "parts" themselves.

I am not familiar with JMP, but MSA software is normally looking for the tolerance range (USL minus LSL). Do you have a unilateral tolerance (i.e., a max or min spec)?

Unless your customer requires the P/T Ratio (uses tolerance), you may be better off using the %GRR, which is GRR as a percent of the process variation. This does not use the tolerance, and is better suited to evaluate the gage's suitability for process control.

Also, search this forum. There are a lot of threads dealing with GRR and destructive testing.
 
B

Bookworm

#3
[The second approach is to use consecutive homogeneous parts from a single lot for the repeats}

So then basically I could measure one design of a device from one lot and then measure the same design of a device from the same lot and compare those results to get my gauge value? And this process is called Nested gage R&R?

I mentioned that the device will permanantely deform after one run. Will I be able to see if there is uniformity in force measurements after deformation between devices if I ran each device two times and compared all force values from the first and second run to get a %GRR? Or should I compare them seperately? ie: find a %GRR for Run 1 of two devices from a single lot, and another seperate %GRR for Run 2 of those same devices


{and parts from different lots for the "parts" themselves}

Finally I wasnt sure what was meant by this statement. Would you mind clarifying? Thanks again!
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#4
Bookworm said:
[The second approach is to use consecutive homogeneous parts from a single lot for the repeats}

So then basically I could measure one design of a device from one lot and then measure the same design of a device from the same lot and compare those results to get my gauge value? And this process is called Nested gage R&R?
For the sake of discussion, lets use the "standard" 10 parts x 3 repeats x 3 operators MSA layout. In your situation, the 10 parts would be 10 different lots of the product. These should be the same design, but different lots. Different designs will inflate your process variation (PV) and give you erroneous results. The three repeats and three operators would be 9 consecutive parts. Operator 1 would test parts 1, 4 & 7. Operator 2 would test parts 2, 5 & 8, and Operator 3 the remainder. Analyze the results using the ANOVA method for a nested study. A crossed study is the normal method used when parts can be measured repeatedly. A nested study is used when the can only be measured once.

Bookworm said:
I mentioned that the device will permanantely deform after one run. Will I be able to see if there is uniformity in force measurements after deformation between devices if I ran each device two times and compared all force values from the first and second run to get a %GRR? Or should I compare them seperately? ie: find a %GRR for Run 1 of two devices from a single lot, and another seperate %GRR for Run 2 of those same devices
An MSA is not really the correct method to use for this. You could perform an MSA on the 1st time results, and a second MSA on the 2nd time results to see whether a pretest reduces test variation (your second option). To quantify the change between tests, you have a number of options, including but not limited to regression analysis. Your first option would inflate the process variation and give erroneous results.

Bookworm said:
{and parts from different lots for the "parts" themselves}

Finally I wasnt sure what was meant by this statement. Would you mind clarifying? Thanks again!
See the first section response.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
K How to perform Verification for a Gage that is used in Destructive Testing Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
D Part Variation, Unilateral Tolerance, Destructive Testing - Gage R&R Experts pls help Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
S How do I do Gage R&R in Destructive Testing? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
M Who are the go to companies for non-destructive hardness testing? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
M Comparing data from destructive testing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
T Interlaboratory comparison or proficiency testing in destructive testing of welded joints ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
A Non-destructive testing methods are special processes? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 18
S Script of R software to conduct Nested GRR for Destructive Testing Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
S About NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) and ISO 17020 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
V Sampling Plan for Destructive Testing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
S Magnetic Particle Inspection Non-Destructive Testing Procedure Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 9
M Manufacturing Process Validation Destructive Testing Sampling Plan Advice Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
J Critical Defect Destructive Testing Sampling Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
A Destructive Testing Failure Mode Sampling Plan Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
E Sequence of Operations - Non-Destructive Testing vs. Trim & Drill Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
C Prices for NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) Inspection for a Boeing 737-400 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
A Performance Qualification For Destructive Testing (Impact Testing) Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
I Destructive Testing Measurement System Analysis (MSA) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
C Batch Acceptance: Cpk requirements and Sample Size - Destructive Testing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
hogheavenfarm Cyclic Destructive Testing - Continuous vs. Segments Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 14
R Non Destructive Testing of plain Carbon steel castings using Eddy Current Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
E Sampling Plan for Destructive Testing - Personal Body Armor Plates Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
W MSA for Destructive Testing - Tensile tester - Welding Processes Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
R NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) - How I can get at least Level 1 certified? Professional Certifications and Degrees 4
L Powder used to make neodymium magnets - GR&R for destructive testing Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
D Destructive Testing with respect to PPAP submissions APQP and PPAP 4
D 76/211/EEC 2.3.3.1 Criteria for Non-Destructive Testing Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Destructive testing: How to determine starting level in Bruceton test? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
G Destructive Testing MSA - Weld Bond Pull - Both destructive and non destructive Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
N Is capability applicable for a destructive test? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 9
M Identifying Technologies for Non Destructive Examination of steel brazed joints Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
D Do I need part variation while doing Destructive Variable Gage R&R MSA study Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 19
C Sampling plan for destructive tests on small lots ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
S Destructive Gage RR - Using Crossed - want your thoughts Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 18
T Destructive Tensile Test Sampling Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
J Gauge R&R for Destructive Test Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
R Destructive Non Reproducibility MSA (Measurement System Analysis) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
S Destructive Attribute MSA for Simple Water Leak Check in Trailers Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
S Samples for a Destructive Test included in a Lot Size? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
E Destructive Pull Test Gage R&R advice needed Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
A Destructive Test Sample Size Reduction Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
A Destructive Attribute (Crossed) Gage R&R - Need Help! Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
O Destructive Attribute Gage R&R without LSL/USL Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
S Looking for A Non-Destructive Crimp Test method to replace Pull Test Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
M Destructive VTMV Subgroups - A Destructive Variable Test Method to Validate Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
B GR&R (Gage R&R) for Destructive Test - Question on how to? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
optomist1 MSA Gage R&R - Destructive Test with One Sided Specification and One Operator Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
C Gage R&R Destructive UTS Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
A Destructive Test Sample Size Determination Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
C "Destructive" Linearity Study Methodology Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom