Detectability score in a use-related FMEA

E

ET_Marley

#1
Hi

I am working on a use-realted hazard identification using FMEA to address the relavant aspect of IEC 62366

When doing an FMEA you can calulate an overall risk score either using just likelihood and severity or likelihood, severity and detectability.

My question is whether or not it is recommended to use detectability in an FMEA to comply with IEC 62366?

My feeling is that detectability should not be included in the risk score as it is either a mitigation strategy or a failure mode in itself (e.g. to fail to detect when a meter reading has gone above acceptable levels).

This view is backed up by the following articles on the internet:

  • Detection in FMEA - why it should not be included in a Pareto ranking; and,
  • The Use and Misuse of FMEA in Risk Analysis (M.W. Schmidt)
(sorry I can't post links as this is my first post)

However, most of the FMEA examples on the internet include detectability in the calculation.

Does anyone else have any views on this?

Many thanks in advance for any assistance.

Marley
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#2
Hello Marley and welcome to the Cove!

IEC 62366 requires that you follow ISO 14971.

ISO 14971 does not require the use of any risk analysis techniques (that's what FMEA is). Also, FMEA is not risk management, it's usually only part of risk analysis.

ISO 14971 does not use detectability because, as you said, it's really a risk control.

So not, you should not use detectability - and you should take care with FMEA.
 
E

ET_Marley

#3
Thanks for the very quick response Marcelo, it is appreciated.

At the current point I am using FMEA (after doing a task analysis) as a systematic way of identifying and understanding use related hazards at the concept stage so we can ensure we mitigate for them in the design. For this purpose it is very useful and I agree it is only part of the risk process.

The other approach I am considering is fault tree analysis but this is a much more complex activity but in many ways produces more informative results in relation to understanding causality at varying levels.
 
#4

Peter Selvey

Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
To provide a quick summary of all the reference material on detection:

Detection can be significant but not always, so it's best not to identify it as a separate factor or score. Rather, just incorporate it into the overall estimate for the probability of harm.
 
P

pgk_94566

#6
While he provided some worthwhile insights, Schmidt's article is critically out-of-date in that he avers "In applying FMEA to risk management, some manufacturers use the concept of detectability to generate an initial risk priority number (RPN). This troubling practice is not found in IEC 60812. It comes not from design FMEA techniques but from the use of FMEA to evaluate manufacturing processes."

This is pointedly at odds with IEC 60812:2006 which states "For a design FMEA detection considers how likely, when, and where a design deficiency will be identified (by review, by analysis, by simulation, by test, etc.).

For a process FMEA detection considers how likely and where in the process a deficiency can be identified and with which probability e.g. by operator, by statistical process control, by quality check procedure or by later steps in the process.
"

The detection dimension of an RPN continues to be a valuable consideration during design verification.
Non credere a tutto ci? che leggi

Hullo Marley,

You have identified Mike Schmidt's article

As you suggest it cautions against using detectability as a separate factor in a 14971 process. Even though that article is several years old now I think it is still very useful. I believe that Mike Schmidt chaired the committee that wrote 14971.

Also of interest is this thread:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
W Is the RPN (risk priority number) in the PFMEA really a RPN without the detectability ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
R Sample size selection to make sure 95% confidence detectability Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
O How to give a score/yield more correctly to my suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 12
A ISO 2859-1 - 9.3.3.2 Switching score - Sampling Plans and PPM AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 0
A PFMEA severity score different applications FMEA and Control Plans 11
S Supplier Evaluation - Is a supplier score card a requirement under ISO and QSR? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
C What is an Airbus Industrial Process Control Assessment (IPCA) Audit Passing Score General Auditing Discussions 1
C Visual Presentation of Supplier Score - .xls Spreadsheet Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 1
M Is there a calculation in Net Promoter Score (NPS) ? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
Q Ford's Q1 Score Prediction Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
T Response to ISO 17025 Proficiency Test z score ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
S Supplier Disruption Score and how to calculate it Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 4
J How do you score (rate) your suppliers? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 33
V Definition Z Score - What is Z-score? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
E Inter-Laboratory Proficiency Testing Result Analysis - z Score or Normalized Error General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
N Does Debt Consolidation Really Help Your Credit Score? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 7
H Supplier Monthly Performance Score Card - Please Review Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
R ASQ CQE Practice Exam - Do I need to score very well to pass? Professional Certifications and Degrees 17
H Score Calculator for WORLD CUP of 2010 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
U Calculate Z-Score for Non-Normal Data - I have two set of data Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 9
N Score One for the Team - I had to ball up and tell the bosses Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 7
A Score capability of measurement of gauge Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
DanteCaspian 5S Workplace Average for those that score 5 S Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 5
P QC Quality Circles - Assessement Score Card for Team Effectiveness Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 3
A Difference between Z score & COV? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
R Sampling Plans - ISO 2859-1: 1999 - How to calculate the switching score? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A How to calculate weights for customer satisfaction score? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
A Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Analyzing the Client Satisfaction Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
R Improving our ISO 9004 score with respect to Natural Resources ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A Autoline Detroit unveils its first Automotive Supplier Score Card World News 0
Stijloor Looking for a "Balanced Score Card" training program for small businesses. Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 5
ScottK Z-Score question: Is this Z related to the normal distribution Z values? Six Sigma 3
N Linking BSC (Balanced Score Card) with Six Sigma Six Sigma 18
W What condition is your company in, if you score 3.0? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 12
W How do you Objectively Score an Internal Audit? Internal Auditing 23
A Is there an established RPN number or score for a DFMEA? FMEA and Control Plans 1
C Automotive OEM Score Card Templates - Supplier performance measurement tool Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 18
A Balance score card ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
S Process and system auditing - numerical score methods General Auditing Discussions 3
D How to Calculate Z Score Values Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
J Balanced Score Card - Using this method for performance measurement Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
M IATF16949 Clause 9.1.2.1e - Customer notification related IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M ERP / QMS related software standards for Validation IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
J Significant change related to design and intended use EU Medical Device Regulations 3
O Release of Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) related to Rules 5th Edition and Sanctioned Interpretations related to IATF 16949:2016 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
T ISO 13485:2016 Clauses related to process matrix ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A IEC 62304 safety classification, External Controls and off-label use related risks IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5
D Equipment Register related question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A ANSI/AAMI versions of 60601-1-2 and related testing requirements Other Medical Device Related Standards 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom